Preview Extract
Chapter 4 Business Process and IT Outsourcing Solutions to End of Chapter Material Answers to What Would You Do Questions You are part of a team that is evaluating and selecting an outsourcing service provider for your firm. During the course of your initial conversation with a manager from one prospective vendor, she says that everyone signs her firm’s standard contract and that there is no need to share contract details at this time. How do you reply? Some students may mention that a team member should insist on seeing the contract before the organization chooses the vendor as its outsourcing service provider. The details of an outsourcing arrangement are documented in a formal contract. The contract describes how responsibilities are divided between the client and the outsourcing firm, what services are to be provided, what service levels must be met, and how problems between the two firms would be resolved. It is common for the length of an outsourcing contract to exceed five years, so the life of the contract could extend well beyond the reign of the executives who crafted it. In response to the manager's assertion that everyone signs her firm's standard contract and that there's no need to share contract details at this time, I would respectfully express the need for transparency and clarity in the outsourcing process. My reply might go something like this: "Thank you for providing insight into your firm's standard procedures. While I appreciate the efficiency of having a standard contract, it's important for us to fully understand the terms and conditions before moving forward. Each partnership is unique, and our firm's requirements may differ from others you've worked with. Therefore, we believe it's essential to review the contract details to ensure alignment with our needs and expectations. Transparency and open communication are crucial for establishing a successful partnership, and we value having a clear understanding of all contractual aspects. Could we please proceed with sharing the contract details so that we can evaluate them thoroughly?" This response acknowledges the manager's input while firmly asserting the need for transparency and customization in the outsourcing agreement. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and aligning with the specific requirements and expectations of our firm. In the course of discussions with a potential outsourcing service provider, a spokesperson reveals that her firm had a major security breach last year. However, she goes on to explain, the company had learned a lot from the incident and, as a result, had implemented many changes. She spends the next 10 minutes summarizing those changes. Later, when you and the rest of your evaluation team are alone, one team member states that allowing a major security breach should disqualify the vendor from further consideration. How do you respond? However, students may mention a study by the Ponemon Institute that found that 65 percent of companies who outsourced work to a vendor have had a data breach involving consumer data. An apt response would be to evaluate the effect of the changes made by the service provider after the security breach. This would help the organization know how it handled the data breach. It would also be helpful to evaluate the security of data among other prospective vendors and weigh the pros and cons of each. When a potential outsourcing service provider discloses a past security breach, it's crucial to carefully consider the context and the steps taken by the company to address the issue. Here's how I might respond to the team member's statement: "I understand your concern about the security breach mentioned by the spokesperson. However, it's important for us to assess the situation holistically. While a security breach is certainly a serious matter, it's equally important to consider how the vendor responded to the incident and what measures they've since implemented to prevent similar occurrences in the future. The fact that the spokesperson took the time to explain the changes made by their company indicates a commitment to addressing security vulnerabilities and improving their processes. Their transparency about the incident demonstrates a level of accountability that is often lacking in such situations. Additionally, the 10-minute summary of changes suggests that they've invested significant resources and effort into enhancing their security posture. Disqualifying the vendor solely based on the fact that they experienced a security breach in the past could potentially overlook valuable insights gained from that experience. It's possible that the vendor's response to the incident and the subsequent improvements they've made have actually strengthened their security measures and made them more vigilant and proactive. Before making a decision, I suggest we thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of the changes implemented by the vendor, inquire about any independent audits or certifications related to their security practices, and assess their overall risk management strategy. By taking a balanced approach and considering all relevant factors, we can make a more informed decision about whether to proceed with this vendor." You are the chief negotiator for your organization’s first outsourcing effort. Your team feels it has identified an excellent outsourcing service provider that meets all your selection criteria. Your organization insists on the right to conduct on-site inspections every six months; however, the service provider has stated that it is unreasonable and that other users are content with on-site inspections once a year. The service provider argues that more frequent inspections are time consuming and disruptive and that they actually weaken the level of security by exposing its operations to too many users. You are about to meet face-to-face with the service provider’s chief operating officer to resolve this issue. How do you proceed? Students may mention the importance of having a service-level agreement (SLA) between the organization and the service provider. A good SLA should define the customer’s right to audit the provider’s compliance and to conduct on-site inspections. Based on the agreement, the organization has the right to insist on-site inspection every six months to ensure that the service provider has taken precautions to meet the organization’s standards. If the service provider finds the inspection time-consuming and disruptive, the organization could evaluate the service provider’s effort with a limited number of users such that it does not hamper the security of the service. When approaching this negotiation with the service provider's chief operating officer, it's important to maintain a collaborative and open-minded stance while also advocating for your organization's needs. Here's a strategic approach: Understand Their Concerns: Begin the meeting by expressing appreciation for the service provider's perspective. Acknowledge their concerns about the frequency of on-site inspections being disruptive and potentially compromising security. Explain Your Organization's Position: Clearly articulate why your organization insists on semi-annual on-site inspections. Highlight any specific security, compliance, or quality assurance requirements that necessitate more frequent inspections. Provide examples or anecdotes that demonstrate the value these inspections bring to your organization's operations. Seek Common Ground: Explore whether there is room for compromise. Perhaps there are alternative methods of inspection or oversight that could satisfy both parties' needs without requiring on-site visits every six months. Propose options such as remote audits, quarterly progress reports, or rotating on-site inspections among different team members to minimize disruption. Emphasize Long-Term Relationship: Reinforce the importance of building a strong and trusting partnership between your organization and the service provider. Emphasize that finding a mutually agreeable solution to this issue will set a positive tone for future collaboration and foster a sense of trust and transparency. Offer Incentives: Consider offering incentives or concessions to sweeten the deal for the service provider. This could include extending the contract term, providing early payment incentives, or offering additional business opportunities in the future. Remain Firm, but Flexible: While advocating for your organization's needs, remain firm on the importance of semi-annual inspections if they are non-negotiable. However, be open to alternative solutions that address the underlying concerns of both parties. Document Agreements: Once a resolution is reached, ensure that the terms are clearly documented in the contract or agreement. This will help prevent misunderstandings or disputes in the future and provide a framework for ongoing collaboration. By approaching the negotiation with empathy, flexibility, and a focus on mutual benefit, you can increase the likelihood of reaching a satisfactory resolution with the service provider's chief operating officer. You have just been appointed the role of SLA manager for your firm’s recently approved $215 million outsourcing contract with IBM. Your manager suggests that you initiate contact with the IBM SLA manager for the contract and provides you with his phone number and email. How do you make the initial contact, and what do you say? Students may mention that governance of an outsourcing contract requires dedicated, trained vendor relationship professionals to manage the working relationship between the organization and outsourcing service provider. Good relationship managers should have excellent communication, problem-solving, and negotiation skills. They also need a thorough knowledge of the business processes and technologies involved. Students may suggest contacting IBM’s SLA manager via email or phone. Subject: Introduction and Initial Contact for SLA Management Dear [IBM SLA Manager's Name], I hope this message finds you well. My name is [Your Name], and I have recently been appointed as the Service Level Agreement (SLA) Manager for our firm's newly approved outsourcing contract with IBM. I am reaching out to establish a direct line of communication between us to ensure the smooth execution and management of our SLAs. As we embark on this partnership, I believe that open and transparent communication will be crucial for both parties to meet and exceed our service level commitments effectively. I am eager to collaborate closely with you and your team to establish clear metrics, monitor performance, and address any potential issues proactively. To kick off our collaboration, I would like to propose scheduling an introductory call at your earliest convenience. During this call, we can discuss the specifics of our SLAs, align on expectations, and explore how we can work together to deliver exceptional service to our stakeholders. Please let me know your availability for a call, and feel free to suggest any agenda items you believe are pertinent to our discussion. I am flexible and willing to accommodate your schedule. Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Best regards, [Your Name] [Your Position] [Your Contact Information] Answers to Discussion Questions What are some differences and key issues that distinguish public, private, and hybrid cloud computing? With public cloud computing, a service provider organization owns and manages the infrastructure (including computing, networking, and storage devices) with cloud user organizations (called tenants) accessing slices of shared hardware resources via the Internet. A private cloud environment is a single tenant cloud. Organizations that implement a private cloud often do so because they are concerned that their data will not be secure in a public cloud. A hybrid cloud is composed of both private and public clouds integrated through networking. Organizations typically use the public cloud to run applications with less sensitive security requirements and highly fluctuating capacity needs, but run more critical applications, such as those with significant compliance requirements, on the private portion of their hybrid cloud. Is it reasonable that an Indian business organization might elect to offshore outsource some of its business processes? Explain your answer fully. Some students may feel that it is reasonable for an Indian business organization to offshore outsource some of its business processes. Organizations decide to outsource to cut costs, improve the firm’s focus on core operations, upgrade the firm’s capabilities and services, and accelerate time to market. While the Indian business organization could gain many potential benefits from outsourcing, they should be aware of the five key areas of risks—lowering of employee morale, quality problems, exposure to legal liabilities, negative impact on business partner and customer relationships and satisfaction, and potential data and security breaches. Yes, it's entirely reasonable for an Indian business organization to elect to offshore outsource some of its business processes. Here's a comprehensive explanation: 1. Cost Savings: Offshore outsourcing, particularly to countries with lower labor costs like India, can significantly reduce operational expenses for a business organization. Labor costs in India are often lower compared to many Western countries, making it an attractive destination for outsourcing. 2. Access to Specialized Skills: India has a large pool of skilled professionals in various fields such as IT, engineering, finance, and customer service. By outsourcing certain business processes offshore, Indian organizations can tap into this talent pool and access specialized skills that may not be readily available domestically. 3. Focus on Core Competencies: Outsourcing non-core business processes allows Indian organizations to focus their resources and attention on core competencies. By delegating tasks such as payroll processing, IT support, or customer service to external service providers, companies can concentrate on strategic initiatives that drive growth and competitiveness. 4. Scalability and Flexibility: Offshore outsourcing provides Indian businesses with scalability and flexibility to adjust their operations according to changing market demands. They can easily scale up or down the outsourced processes based on business needs without having to invest in additional infrastructure or hire permanent employees. 5. Global Market Expansion: Outsourcing certain functions offshore can facilitate global market expansion for Indian businesses. By leveraging outsourcing partners in different countries, organizations can establish a presence in new markets more efficiently and cost-effectively. 6. Technological Advancements: India has made significant advancements in technology and infrastructure, making it easier for businesses to engage in offshore outsourcing. With reliable internet connectivity, communication tools, and data security measures, Indian organizations can seamlessly collaborate with offshore partners. 7. Risk Mitigation: Offshore outsourcing can also help Indian organizations mitigate risks associated with business operations. By diversifying their service providers and spreading operations across different geographical locations, companies can reduce the impact of potential disruptions such as natural disasters, political instability, or economic downturns. In summary, offshore outsourcing offers numerous benefits for Indian business organizations, including cost savings, access to specialized skills, focus on core competencies, scalability, global market expansion, technological advancements, and risk mitigation. Therefore, it is entirely reasonable for Indian companies to choose offshore outsourcing as a strategic business decision. In your career, are you involved in performing or managing a core business process? How might your involvement in a core business process affect your future career with your current employer? However, students may mention that a core business process is one that provides valuable customer benefits, is hard for competitors to imitate, and can be leveraged widely across many products and markets. An employee involved in a core business process possesses unique knowledge and skills that could be used by an organization to operate its processes effectively and to develop a wide range of products. Core processes typically have a direct impact on the organization’s customers, are major cost drivers, or are essential for providing services. As an AI language model, I'm not involved in performing or managing core business processes in the traditional sense. However, my role is to assist users like you by providing information, generating text, and offering insights across various domains and industries. For individuals who are involved in core business processes within their organizations, their level of involvement can significantly impact their future career with their current employer. Here's how: Visibility and Contribution: Being involved in core business processes often means that an individual's work directly impacts the organization's key objectives and outcomes. This level of visibility can enhance their reputation within the company and highlight their contributions to its success. Skill Development: Involvement in core business processes provides opportunities for skill development and mastery in areas critical to the organization's operations. This can include project management, strategic planning, process optimization, and leadership skills, among others. Career Advancement: Demonstrating proficiency in managing core business processes can open doors for career advancement opportunities within the organization. Employees who excel in these areas may be considered for promotions, leadership roles, or special projects that align with their expertise. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Core business processes often involve collaboration across different departments and teams within an organization. Those who are actively engaged in these processes have the chance to build strong relationships with colleagues across various functions, enhancing their network and fostering a collaborative work culture. Strategic Influence: Individuals involved in core business processes are often consulted for their insights and expertise when making strategic decisions. Their understanding of the organization's operations and objectives allows them to provide valuable input that can shape the company's direction and priorities. Job Security and Stability: Employees who play integral roles in core business processes are often seen as indispensable assets to the organization. This can provide a greater sense of job security and stability, especially during times of organizational change or economic uncertainty. Overall, involvement in core business processes can have a profound impact on an individual's career trajectory within their current employer, paving the way for growth, advancement, and continued success within the organization. Identify five key areas of risk associated with outsourcing. What additional risks are introduced with offshore outsourcing? Five key areas of risk include lowering of employee morale, quality problems, exposure to legal liabilities, negative impact on business partner and customer relationships and satisfaction, and potential data and security breaches. Firms that consider establishing offshore outsourcing agreements should be aware that major differences between outsourcing and offshore outsourcing must be taken into account. The most obvious issues are how to control and manage the work being performed when one’s outsourcing partner may not speak the same language and is guided by different cultural values and industry standards. This issue is only intensified by thousands of miles of separation across multiple time zones and the extreme difficulty of meeting face to face. Such separation creates a high potential for lost productivity due to communication problems and increased opportunity for misunderstandings. Other issues associated with offshore outsourcing include the following: Jurisdiction Data privacy Diminishing cost advantages Turnover Intellectual property rights Important technology issues A process for planning an effective outsourcing process was outlined in the chapter. Which steps in this process help to reduce the risks of an outsourcing failure? How do these steps reduce risk? However, students may mention that outsourcing is like any other business initiative; it takes planning, knowledge, and skill to execute well. Many of the organizations that successfully implement an outsourcing strategy carefully plan and execute their outsourcing efforts following a multistep process. Indeed, spending adequate quality time on this process is considered a critical success factor in outsourcing deals. The steps in this process are as follows: Establish a “smart” outsourcing strategy Evaluate and select appropriate activities and projects for outsourcing Evaluate and select appropriate service providers Evaluate service provider locations Benchmark existing service levels Define the service-level agreement Develop an outsourcing contract Establish an outsourcing governance process Measure and evaluate results Some students may mention that the “evaluate and select appropriate activities and projects for outsourcing” step would help reduce the risks of an outsourcing failure. Many outsourcing projects have failed to meet expectations, especially when work was relocated simply to cut labor costs or to clean up a poorly performing operation. Generally, shifting seriously flawed operations to a less expensive organization does not solve fundamental problems. Thus, an organization must carefully consider which processes and projects it should assign for outsourcing. Several steps in the process for planning an effective outsourcing process outlined in the chapter help to reduce the risks of an outsourcing failure: Assessing Internal Capabilities and Needs: By thoroughly evaluating internal capabilities and identifying the specific needs that outsourcing can address, organizations can ensure that they are outsourcing the right functions to the right providers. This reduces the risk of mismatched expectations and ensures that the chosen outsourcing strategy aligns with the organization's objectives. Performing Due Diligence on Service Providers: Conducting thorough due diligence on potential service providers helps organizations assess their capabilities, reputation, financial stability, and past performance. This step allows organizations to select trustworthy and competent partners, reducing the risk of engaging with unreliable or incompetent vendors. Defining Clear Objectives and Requirements: Clearly defining outsourcing objectives, requirements, and performance metrics helps set expectations for both the organization and the service provider. This clarity reduces the risk of misunderstandings or disagreements regarding deliverables, timelines, quality standards, and performance expectations. Developing a Robust Contract: Creating a comprehensive and well-defined contract that outlines all terms, conditions, responsibilities, and deliverables is essential for mitigating outsourcing risks. A robust contract helps clarify expectations, allocate risks, and provide legal recourse in case of disputes or failures to meet obligations. Establishing Effective Communication Channels: Establishing effective communication channels and mechanisms for ongoing collaboration and feedback between the organization and the service provider is crucial for managing outsourcing risks. Transparent and open communication facilitates early detection of issues, timely resolution of problems, and alignment of activities with organizational goals. Implementing Governance and Monitoring Mechanisms: Implementing governance structures and monitoring mechanisms to oversee the outsourcing relationship helps organizations track performance, ensure compliance with contractual agreements, and address any deviations or issues promptly. This proactive approach reduces the risk of outsourcing failures by enabling timely intervention and corrective actions. Developing Contingency Plans: Developing contingency plans and exit strategies in case of unforeseen events, such as vendor bankruptcy, service disruptions, or quality issues, helps organizations mitigate risks associated with outsourcing. Having alternative options and fallback mechanisms in place minimizes the impact of potential failures and ensures business continuity. Overall, these steps help reduce the risks of outsourcing failure by promoting clarity, transparency, accountability, effective communication, and proactive risk management throughout the outsourcing process. By following a systematic approach and addressing key factors that contribute to outsourcing success, organizations can minimize risks and maximize the benefits of outsourcing initiatives. Why is the termination clause in an outsourcing contract critical? What are some of the common causes for termination? Ending outsourcing agreements prematurely can generate expensive legal fees. Thus, every outsourcing agreement contains a termination clause that defines the conditions under which either party in the agreement may exit the outsourcing relationship. Common termination reasons include termination for convenience, termination for failure to meet service and performance levels, termination for material breach of contract, and termination for financial crises. Termination for convenience gives a party the right to unilaterally terminate the contract at any time—with or without giving a reason. The other party is generally entitled to a negotiated settlement for an equitable recovery of costs and losses incurred. A material breach of contract is a failure to perform that strikes so deeply at the heart of the contract that it renders the agreement irreparably broken and defeats the purpose of making the contract in the first place. If a material breach occurs, the other party can simply end the agreement and go to court to try to collect damages caused by the breach. What is meant by smart sourcing? Smart sourcing is based on analyzing the work to be done, including its associated current processes and the level of effectiveness and resources required, and then determining the best way to do that work in the future—whether with internal employees, onshore or offshore outsourcing firms, or some combination. Give an example of a business process that would be appropriate to consider for a firm’s first venture into business process outsourcing. Give an example of an inappropriate business process. Payroll is an example of a business that is easy to outsource and can generate operational savings while freeing up personnel. The payroll process itself is fairly simple with well-defined requirements. Examples of both appropriate and inappropriate business processes for a firm's first venture into business process outsourcing: 1. Appropriate Business Process: Payroll Processing: Payroll processing involves repetitive tasks such as calculating employee wages, deductions, and taxes, which can be standardized and easily outsourced. By outsourcing payroll processing to a specialized firm, the company can benefit from cost savings, improved accuracy, and compliance with regulations. Since payroll processing is a non-core function, outsourcing it allows the company to focus on its core competencies and strategic objectives. 2. Inappropriate Business Process: Strategic Decision-Making: Strategic decision-making involves critical thinking, analysis, and judgment, which are typically core competencies of the company's leadership team. Outsourcing strategic decision-making can lead to loss of control, confidentiality risks, and potential conflicts of interest. Since strategic decisions shape the direction and future of the company, they should remain internal to ensure alignment with organizational goals and values. Outsourcing such a critical function may undermine the company's competitive advantage and long-term success. Is there a difference between an outsourcing service provider and a partner? Explain fully. Some students may mention that when outsourcing a major business process or project, an organization should think in terms of hiring a partner, not just a provider. Ideally, the organization can choose an outsourcing firm with which it can build a strong strategic partnership based on a mutually sustained commitment to achieve specific business goals. The customer must use due diligence in carefully researching the potential partner’s capabilities and reputation. This research can be conducted through discussions with current and former customers of the firm, seeking input from industry trade groups and consultants, on-site visits to the vendor’s facilities, and a review of public records related to the firm. These records include Dun & Bradstreet credit reports, filings and reports from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and articles in trade magazines and the press. Yes, there is a significant difference between an outsourcing service provider and a partner, although they may sometimes overlap in practice. Let's break down each: 1. Outsourcing Service Provider: An outsourcing service provider is a third-party company hired by another organization to perform specific tasks, functions, or processes on behalf of the client. The relationship between the client and the outsourcing service provider is typically transactional and focused on delivering defined services or outputs according to agreed-upon terms and conditions. The outsourcing service provider is accountable for meeting service level agreements (SLAs) and delivering results within specified timeframes and quality standards. The client maintains control over the outsourced activities and may have limited involvement in the provider's operations beyond managing the outsourcing contract. 2. Partner: A partner, on the other hand, implies a deeper and more collaborative relationship characterized by shared goals, mutual trust, and a long-term commitment to achieving success together. In the context of outsourcing, a partner goes beyond the role of a service provider to actively contribute to the client's strategic objectives, business growth, and innovation initiatives. Partnerships are built on open communication, transparency, and a willingness to align interests for mutual benefit. Unlike a traditional outsourcing arrangement, a partnership involves a higher level of integration, collaboration, and co-investment between the client and the partner organization. Partners may have a stake in each other's success and work together to solve complex problems, drive continuous improvement, and explore new opportunities. In summary, while an outsourcing service provider fulfills specific contractual obligations for a fee, a partner engages in a more symbiotic relationship aimed at achieving shared objectives, fostering innovation, and creating long-term value for both parties. What are some hallmarks of a good user–outsourcing service provider relationship? One of the keys to a successful outsourcing relationship is for both the customer and the outsourcing service provider to assign an SLA manager; these managers must work together to develop and oversee the agreement. The SLA manager serves as the primary point of contact for any issues related to the delivery of the services covered in the SLA. The SLA manager establishes a good working relationship with the other organization’s SLA manager and maintains regular and ongoing communications. The SLA manager also performs an ongoing assessment of the process used to track and report service levels and participates in the conflict resolution process for resolving any issues in the outsourcing agreement. What is the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements 16 (SSAE 16)? Why is it important to an outsourcing service provider? Firms looking to outsource should also review certain audit documents for any potential provider to ensure that the provider has adequate internal controls in place. It is imperative that the service provider demonstrate that it can process all data accurately and completely and that it can maintain control over who has access to the customer’s data. One such audit document is based on the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements 16 (SSAE 16), a regulation created by the Auditing Standards Board (ASB) of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that defines how service companies must report on compliance controls. SSAE reports provide the auditors of user organizations with detailed information about controls at a service organization that affect the information provided to users. User auditors review the report to understand how the service organization interacts with the user’s financial reporting system, including how the information gets incorporated into the user’s financial statements. If a public company is using an outsourcing firm to perform financially significant duties for it, the public company is required to use a SSAE 16-qualified provider. Firms considering outsourcing need to spend considerable time and effort to thoroughly review the outsourcing firm’s SSAE 16 or ISAE 3402 audit and ensure that they understand the firm’s control goals and implementations. They must be comfortable that the internal controls implemented by their potential partner are adequate. Failure to share the results of an SSAE 16 or ISAE 3402 audit should be a warning signal in dealing with an outsourcing vendor. What are some factors that should be considered when evaluating service provider locations? Any outsourcing provider, no matter what its base of operations, can be affected by economic turmoil, natural disasters, and political disturbances. The potential for these risks is greater in some places than others. Ideally, an organization’s outsourcing partner can provide services from several geographical locations if necessary. The organization should investigate the capability for avoiding business interruption whether the outsourcing firm is “on shore” (in the same country as the organization) or offshore. Other factors when considering location include the availability and reliability of high-speed communications networks and power grids; the availability of sufficiently trained workers; and the effectiveness of the outsourcing firm’s national legal system in protecting intellectual property, including copyrights, trade secrets, and patents. Of course, the challenges of outsourcing become even more difficult when the work is being done in a country that has significant language, cultural, and time zone differences. Such considerations may force a firm to change its initial choice of outsourcing service partner. Action Needed You have worked for two years as the claims manager in a mid-sized financial services firm. You have been wondering about your future with the firm as you’ve heard rumors that it is about to close a five-year deal to outsource the servicing of its claims payment process to a respected firm in India. You have mixed feelings as you stare in amazement at the text message you have just received from your manager: “We need an experienced manager to relocate to India for six to nine months to make sure that we get off to a good start with a claims processing outsourcing project. I’d like to put in your name for this opportunity. I’m on my way into a meeting to discuss potential candidates. What do you think?” How would you respond? Some students may mention that while the message from the employee’s manager may have come as a shock, the offer of this position could be a great opportunity. The employee should tell the manager that he/she will consider the position, but need a chance to discuss it at more length before making a decision. This will keep the employee in the running for the position without committing to it. Prior to meeting with the manager to learn more about the position, the employee may want to mention this opportunity to his/her family or a few close friends to see their reaction. They may encourage the employee to explore the opportunity, or they may express severe reservations. In any case, the employee will have an idea of what accepting the position will mean to them. The employee should try to identify friends or co-workers who have worked or are still working in India and ask them about their experiences. This will give the employee an inkling of what he/she can expect in terms of living conditions. In meeting with the manager to discuss the position, the employee should listen carefully and ask questions such as “What are the responsibilities and expectations that come with the position?” and “What might taking this position mean to my future career when I return home?” Dear [Manager's Name], Thank you for considering me for this opportunity to be part of the claims processing outsourcing project in India. I appreciate your confidence in my abilities and the trust you've placed in me to take on such a crucial role. While I'm honored to be considered, I would like to take some time to thoroughly evaluate this opportunity and its implications for my career and personal life. Relocating to India for six to nine months is a significant commitment that requires careful consideration of various factors, including family obligations, professional growth, and personal preferences. I would like to request some time to discuss this opportunity further with you, preferably in person or via a scheduled meeting, where we can delve into the specifics of the role, the expectations, and the potential impact on both the project's success and my career trajectory within the company. Once I have had the opportunity to gather more information and reflect on the potential implications, I will provide you with a well-considered response. I hope you understand the importance of this decision and appreciate your support throughout this process. Thank you again for considering me for this exciting opportunity, and I look forward to our discussion. Sincerely, [Your Name] One of your classmates has just finished an on-campus job interview with a representative from a local bank. During the interview, the recruiter discussed the need for qualified people to serve on a team that manages the relationship with a major outsourcing vendor who handles all credit card payments. Your classmate just sent you a text message that says you should cancel your interview with this firm because the role discussed seemed meaningless. Would you cancel the interview? How would you reply to your classmate? The student should try to get some more data from his/her classmate about the role and what sort of skills and experiences the recruiter is looking for. Why does the classmate think that the role is meaningless? Did he/she think there were any unique opportunities with the role? For example, did he/she think that there is an opportunity to travel overseas and learn new languages and cultures? The student should not cancel the interview with GM, but instead he/she should go into the interview with an open mind. The student should listen carefully and ask questions about the role and expectations of someone filling the role. I wouldn't jump to canceling the interview based solely on your classmate's perspective. Instead, I would ask your classmate for more details about why they found the role meaningless. It's possible they misunderstood the job description or didn't grasp the significance of managing a relationship with a major outsourcing vendor. After gathering more information, I would consider the potential value of the role for your career goals and interests. Managing a relationship with a major outsourcing vendor for credit card payments could offer valuable experience in vendor management, financial services, and relationship-building skills, which are transferrable to various industries and roles. In responding to your classmate, you could say something like: "Thanks for letting me know about your interview experience. I appreciate your input. However, before making a decision, I'd like to learn more about why you found the role meaningless. It could be that there are aspects of the position that are not immediately apparent but could be valuable for career development. Let's discuss further before I make any decisions about canceling my interview." Web-Based Case Salesforce.com Outsourcing Policies Go online to investigate Salesforce’s policies on (1) shared resource risk management, (2) virtualization software, (3) service disruption, (4) disaster recovery, (5) data ownership, (6) record retention, and (7) customization. Are these policies posted, easily accessed, and transparent? What questions would you have to ask a Salesforce vendor to find this information? Students’ search results of Salesforce’s policies that can be posted, easily accessed, and transparent, and the questions that they will have to ask a Salesforce vendor will vary. To investigate Salesforce's policies on the mentioned areas, you would typically navigate their official website and consult their documentation or support resources. Here's how you can approach each of the topics: Shared Resource Risk Management: Look for information regarding how Salesforce manages shared resources and mitigates risks associated with it. This might involve their approach to security, data segregation, and compliance measures. Virtualization Software: Check if Salesforce has any guidelines or policies regarding the use of virtualization software in conjunction with their services. This could include compatibility, performance, and security considerations. Service Disruption: Explore Salesforce's policies or documentation regarding how they handle service disruptions or downtime. Look for details on their uptime guarantees, notification procedures during outages, and any compensation or remedies offered to customers. Disaster Recovery: Investigate how Salesforce ensures business continuity in the event of a disaster. This may involve redundant infrastructure, data backup strategies, failover mechanisms, and recovery time objectives. Data Ownership: Look for clarity on data ownership rights within the Salesforce ecosystem. This should outline who owns the data stored or processed using Salesforce services, and what rights customers have over their data. Record Retention: Check for information on Salesforce's policies regarding the retention of customer records and data. This may include data archival procedures, retention periods, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Customization: Explore Salesforce's policies regarding customization of their services or platforms. This could include limitations on customization, support for customizations, impact on service levels, and long-term maintenance considerations. To find this information from a Salesforce vendor, you could ask questions such as: Can you provide documentation or references regarding Salesforce's policies on shared resource risk management? How does Salesforce handle service disruptions, and what are their commitments regarding uptime and availability? What are the data ownership rights and responsibilities for customers using Salesforce services? Can you explain Salesforce's approach to disaster recovery and business continuity? How flexible is Salesforce in terms of customization, and what are the limitations or considerations for customizing their services? Are there any specific guidelines or requirements for using virtualization software with Salesforce? By asking these questions, you can gauge the transparency and accessibility of Salesforce's policies and ensure alignment with your organization's requirements and expectations. Identify another smaller SaaS provider. Can you find the company’s policies on its Web site? Have they experienced security breaches? Compare the risks of cloud sourcing to large, well-known vendors versus smaller, less well-known vendors. Students may identify different, smaller SaaS providers. Their search results on the company’s policies and security breaches will vary. One example is "Freshworks Inc." Freshworks provides a suite of business software solutions including customer support, CRM, and IT service management. To find the company's policies and information on security breaches, we can visit their website and look for sections like "Security," "Privacy Policy," or "Trust Center." Here's what I found: Security Policy: Freshworks provides detailed information about their security measures on their website. They offer data encryption, access controls, regular security audits, and compliance with industry standards like SOC 2 Type II and GDPR. Privacy Policy: Freshworks has a comprehensive privacy policy outlining how they collect, use, and protect personal data. They also provide information on users' rights regarding their data. Trust Center: Freshworks has a trust center where they provide real-time status updates on their services, including any incidents or outages. As for security breaches, it's important to stay updated with the latest news and reports. As of my last update, Freshworks hadn't experienced any major security breaches. However, it's always a good idea to check recent news and security reports for the most current information. Comparing the risks of cloud sourcing with smaller vendors like Freshworks versus larger, well-known vendors like Microsoft or Google: Large, well-known vendors: They often have robust security measures, dedicated security teams, and extensive resources to invest in security. They may also offer greater transparency and accountability due to their established reputation. However, they could be more tempting targets for cyber attacks due to their prominence and the vast amount of data they handle. Smaller, less well-known vendors: While smaller vendors may not have the same level of resources as larger companies, they can still prioritize security and compliance. However, they might face challenges in terms of scalability and may not have the same level of visibility into their security practices. There could also be concerns about the long-term viability of smaller vendors and their ability to maintain security standards over time. In summary, both large and small SaaS providers have their own set of risks and benefits when it comes to cloud sourcing. It's essential for businesses to conduct thorough due diligence, assess their specific security needs, and choose providers that align with their requirements and risk tolerance. Case Study Procter and Gamble—a Model of Innovative Outsourcing Discussion Questions How did P&G’s decision to centralize and standardize global business services in the 1990s enable it to effectively outsource business services starting in 2003? However, students may mention that during the 1990s, P&G experienced rapid global growth. Responding to the need to service internal corporate clients around the world, the company’s Global Business Service (GBS) established three Shared Service Centers in Costa Rica, the Philippines, and England. The centers standardized the way certain services were delivered to P&G business units. The transformation enabled P&G to eliminate redundant activities, streamline internal services, better support multiple business units, and improve the quality and speed of service. Standardization of services also allowed P&G to develop a major outsourcing program. After A.G. Lafley became CEO in 2000, he and other company executives decided that P&G needed to abandon the conventional in-house services model and partner with outsourced service providers who could drive down costs and help the company promote innovation. In 2003, P&G’s GBS took what seemed to be a major leap of faith, awarding $4.2 billion worth of outsourcing contracts to support its IT infrastructure, finance and accounting, human resources, and facilities management operations. P&G turned to IBM for employee services; Jones Lang LaSalle for facilities management; and HP for IT applications, infrastructure, and some accounts payable functions. These companies each took on a portion of P&G employees and responsibility for some of the Shared Service Centers. P&G's decision to centralize and standardize global business services in the 1990s laid the foundation for its successful outsourcing strategy initiated in 2003. Here's how: Centralization and Standardization: By centralizing and standardizing its global business services, P&G created a uniform structure across its operations worldwide. This enabled streamlined processes, greater efficiency, and consistency in service delivery. Such standardization allowed P&G to clearly define its service requirements, making it easier to communicate expectations to potential outsourcing partners. Process Optimization: Through centralization, P&G could identify redundancies, inefficiencies, and areas for improvement in its business processes. This optimization prepared the company for outsourcing by ensuring that its internal operations were already as efficient and effective as possible. It also facilitated the transition of these optimized processes to outsourcing partners, minimizing disruptions and maximizing the benefits of outsourcing. Clear Service Specifications: Standardizing global business services meant that P&G had clearly defined service specifications and performance metrics. This clarity was essential for outsourcing, as it enabled P&G to accurately convey its needs and expectations to potential service providers. Clear specifications also made it easier to evaluate potential outsourcing partners and negotiate service agreements. Risk Mitigation: Centralizing and standardizing global business services helped P&G mitigate the risks associated with outsourcing. By having a consistent framework and understanding of its own operations, P&G could better assess the risks and benefits of outsourcing particular services or processes. Additionally, standardization allowed P&G to maintain control over critical aspects of its operations, even when outsourcing certain functions. Strategic Focus: By outsourcing non-core business services, P&G could redirect its resources and focus on its core competencies, such as product innovation and marketing. Centralization and standardization freed up internal resources that could be allocated to strategic initiatives, enhancing P&G's competitive advantage and driving business growth. Overall, P&G's decision to centralize and standardize global business services provided the necessary groundwork for its successful outsourcing strategy. It enabled the company to effectively manage outsourcing relationships, optimize its processes, mitigate risks, and focus on its core competencies, ultimately contributing to P&G's continued success and innovation in the global marketplace. How has outsourcing benefited both P&G and its strategic outsourcing partners? However, students may mention that in 2003, P&G’s Global Business Service awarded $4.2 billion worth of outsourcing contracts to support its IT infrastructure, finance and accounting, human resources, and facilities management operations. P&G turned to IBM for employee services; Jones Lang LaSalle for facilities management; and HP for IT applications, infrastructure, and some accounts payable functions. These companies each took on a portion of P&G employees and responsibility for some of the Shared Service Centers. Over time, the number of P&G’s strategic outsourcing partners grew and each relationship was handled a little differently. In 2010, GBS decided to launch a smart outsourcing strategy called strategic alliance management to maximize the benefits gained by its outsourcing contracts. Gleaned from best practices refined over the previous years, this program (1) adopted a joint business planning process with outsourcing partners, (2) established appropriate measures to assess progress, and (3) developed an Alliance Management platform that brought together all the data, people, reports, and communications for each outsourcing partnership. Procter & Gamble (P&G) has leveraged outsourcing as a strategic tool to enhance its efficiency, focus on core competencies, and drive innovation. The benefits of outsourcing for P&G and its strategic partners are multifold: Cost Savings: Outsourcing allows P&G to access specialized services or skills at a lower cost than maintaining those capabilities in-house. By outsourcing non-core functions such as IT, customer service, or manufacturing, P&G can achieve significant cost savings through economies of scale and labor arbitrage. Focus on Core Competencies: Outsourcing enables P&G to concentrate on its core competencies, such as product development, marketing, and brand management. By delegating peripheral tasks to outsourcing partners, P&G can allocate more resources and attention to activities that directly contribute to its competitive advantage and value proposition. Access to Expertise: Strategic outsourcing partners often possess specialized expertise and technology that P&G may not have in-house. By collaborating with these partners, P&G gains access to best practices, innovative solutions, and advanced capabilities that enhance its operational efficiency and product quality. Scalability and Flexibility: Outsourcing provides P&G with the flexibility to scale its operations up or down in response to market fluctuations, seasonal demand, or business expansion. Outsourcing partners can quickly adjust resources and capacity to accommodate P&G's changing needs, thereby improving agility and responsiveness. Risk Mitigation: By outsourcing certain functions, P&G can mitigate risks associated with fluctuations in demand, technological obsolescence, or regulatory changes. Outsourcing partners may also assume some of the operational risks, such as supply chain disruptions or compliance issues, allowing P&G to focus on its core business objectives. Global Reach: Strategic outsourcing partnerships enable P&G to extend its global reach and tap into new markets more effectively. Outsourcing partners with a presence in diverse geographical regions can help P&G navigate local regulations, cultural nuances, and market dynamics, facilitating international expansion and growth. Innovation and Collaboration: Collaborating with outsourcing partners fosters a culture of innovation and knowledge exchange within P&G. By working closely with external vendors, P&G can gain fresh perspectives, access new technologies, and co-create innovative solutions that drive competitive advantage and market leadership. In summary, outsourcing has been instrumental in enhancing P&G's operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and innovation capabilities while enabling the company to focus on its core business priorities and strategic objectives. By forging strong partnerships with outsourcing vendors, P&G can leverage external expertise, resources, and scalability to maintain its competitive edge in the global marketplace. How does P&G’s strategic alliance management system help it avoid the pitfalls of outsourcing? What risks does the system not address? However, students may mention that a joint business planning process involves employees from both GBS and an outsourcing service provider who come together to set targets. Specifically, the team identifies base measures (e.g., performance or revenue) with targets and then creates a list of projects and initiatives to help meet those targets. The team brainstorms innovative goals and “wicked problems”—problems that are likely to impact business performance. To assess projects, GBS also adopted standard service-level agreement (SLA) measures that track performance both at the granular and aggregate levels. Aggregate level measures, for example, might include rating customer satisfaction. Finally, GBS designed and developed an Alliance Management platform, a shared online space where team members could access data, people, performance reports, service-level measures, training news, the joint business plan, an integrated alliance calendar, and any document specific to the relationship with a partner. GBS ensures accountability by assigning key roles for overseeing the management of each outsourcing relationship, including an executive sponsor, a relationship manager, a deal manager, a transition manager, and an alliance architect (to oversee the governance of the outsource agreement). This strategic alliance management process allows P&G to recognize and reward good performance through renewal decisions at the end of the relationship agreement and by offering contracts for new initiatives to the outsourcing partner. P&G's strategic alliance management system is designed to mitigate the risks associated with outsourcing while harnessing the benefits of collaboration with external partners. Here's how it helps avoid outsourcing pitfalls: Quality Control: By forming strategic alliances, P&G can maintain better control over the quality of products and services compared to traditional outsourcing. The company can collaborate closely with its partners to ensure that standards are met and maintained throughout the partnership. Risk Sharing: Strategic alliances enable P&G to share risks with its partners. Rather than bearing the entire burden of a project or operation, the company can distribute responsibilities and liabilities among multiple parties, reducing its exposure to unforeseen risks. Access to Expertise: P&G can leverage the specialized knowledge and capabilities of its alliance partners. This access to expertise allows the company to tap into external resources and skills that it may not possess internally, enhancing its competitiveness and innovation capabilities. Flexibility: Strategic alliances offer P&G greater flexibility compared to traditional outsourcing arrangements. The company can adapt more easily to changing market conditions, technological advancements, and consumer preferences by collaborating with a network of partners rather than being locked into rigid outsourcing contracts. Long-term Relationships: P&G's alliance management system emphasizes building long-term relationships with its partners. This focus on collaboration fosters trust, transparency, and mutual understanding, which are essential for successful partnerships and sustainable value creation. However, despite these benefits, P&G's strategic alliance management system may not fully address certain risks associated with outsourcing: Dependency Risk: While strategic alliances diversify risks compared to traditional outsourcing, there's still a potential risk of becoming overly dependent on key partners. If a partner fails to deliver as expected or terminates the alliance abruptly, P&G may face disruptions in its operations or supply chain. Intellectual Property Protection: Collaborating with external partners may expose P&G to risks related to intellectual property (IP) protection. Despite precautions, there's always a possibility of IP leakage or infringement, especially when sharing proprietary information and technologies with alliance partners. Cultural Misalignment: Differences in organizational culture, values, and objectives between P&G and its alliance partners could pose challenges to effective collaboration. Managing cultural diversity and ensuring alignment of goals and strategies require ongoing effort and communication. Performance Variability: While P&G aims to maintain quality standards through strategic alliances, performance variability among partners remains a potential risk. Variations in capabilities, resources, and commitment levels among different partners may impact the consistency and reliability of products and services. Exit Strategy: Exiting a strategic alliance can be complex and challenging, particularly if the partnership has been long-term or deeply integrated into P&G's operations. The lack of a clear exit strategy could result in disputes, financial losses, or reputational damage. In summary, while P&G's strategic alliance management system offers numerous advantages in mitigating the pitfalls of outsourcing, it's essential for the company to remain vigilant and proactive in addressing the remaining risks to ensure the success and sustainability of its partnerships. Procter and Gamble generated $83 billion in sales worldwide in 2013. What advantage does this give it in negotiating outsourcing contracts with its strategic partners? Can smaller companies achieve similar outsourcing success with a smart outsourcing strategy? Why or why not? However, students may mention that the strategic alliance management process allows P&G to recognize and reward good performance through renewal decisions at the end of the relationship agreement and by offering contracts for new initiatives to an outsourcing partner. Students may cite the example of P&G and Accenture to substantiate their answer. Accenture helped P&G develop the Decision Cockpit. As a result of the success of this and other joint projects, P&G looked to Accenture to help consolidate and enhance the company’s virtual solutions. The virtual solutions substantially reduced cost; however, P&G noticed that service delivery was highly fragmented as different outsource partners implemented the virtual solutions. So, P&G awarded Accenture a multiyear contract to manage all of P&G’s virtual solutions content delivery, freeing up P&G to focus on other areas of innovation. As a result of this long-term successful collaboration, the Outsourcing Center awarded P&G and Accenture the Outstanding Excellence Award in the Most Innovative category in 2013. Some students may be of the opinion that smaller companies can achieve similar outsourcing success with a smart outsourcing strategy, while others may hold the opposite opinion. Procter and Gamble's significant sales volume of $83 billion in 2013 affords it substantial leverage when negotiating outsourcing contracts with strategic partners. This level of revenue demonstrates P&G's market presence, stability, and purchasing power, which can be used as bargaining chips during negotiations. With such high sales figures, P&G can often demand favorable terms, including cost reductions, quality guarantees, and priority access to resources from its outsourcing partners. Moreover, P&G's scale allows it to spread the fixed costs of outsourcing across a large revenue base, potentially achieving economies of scale that smaller companies might struggle to match. Smaller companies can indeed achieve successful outsourcing strategies, but they may face different challenges and need to adopt a more targeted approach. While they may not have the same bargaining power as industry giants like P&G, smaller companies can still leverage their unique strengths to negotiate favorable terms. This might include focusing on niche markets where they have a competitive advantage, building strong relationships with a select group of outsourcing partners, and prioritizing flexibility and innovation in their outsourcing agreements. Additionally, smaller companies can benefit from outsourcing by gaining access to specialized skills, technology, and resources that they may not have in-house. By carefully selecting outsourcing partners and closely managing these relationships, smaller companies can mitigate risks and maximize the value derived from outsourcing. However, they may need to be more vigilant in monitoring performance, managing costs, and ensuring alignment with their strategic objectives compared to larger firms like P&G. Ultimately, while the scale of P&G provides unique advantages in outsourcing negotiations, smaller companies can still achieve outsourcing success through smart strategies tailored to their specific circumstances and goals. What lessons can large companies and governments take away from P&G’s success with outsourcing? Students may mention that there are many lessons that large companies and governments can take away from P&G’s success with outsourcing. Some of them are as listed below: Importance of standardization of services Adoption of a joint business planning process with outsourcing partners Adoption of a standard service-level agreement (SLA) measure that tracks performance both at the granular and aggregate levels Development of a shared online space where team members could access data, people, and performance reports Collaboration with one specific outsource partner, instead of many outsourcing partners, to implement one type of management solution Collaboration with outsourcing service providers offshore to reduce costs and have the benefit of a workforce with sufficient technological expertise and English-language skills Procter & Gamble's success with outsourcing offers valuable lessons for both large companies and governments: 1. Focus on Core Competencies: P&G's outsourcing strategy allowed it to focus on its core competencies, such as innovation, brand management, and marketing. Large companies should assess what functions are essential to their competitive advantage and consider outsourcing non-core activities to specialized vendors. 2. Cost Efficiency: Outsourcing can lead to cost savings through economies of scale and access to cheaper labor markets. Governments and companies can explore outsourcing opportunities to optimize resource allocation and reduce operational expenses. 3. Access to Expertise: By outsourcing certain tasks to specialized firms, companies can access external expertise and technologies that may not be available in-house. Governments can leverage outsourcing to tap into specialized skills and knowledge for complex projects or initiatives. 4. Flexibility and Scalability: Outsourcing provides flexibility and scalability, allowing companies to adjust resources based on demand fluctuations or changing business needs. Governments can adopt similar approaches to scale their operations efficiently and respond effectively to evolving challenges. 5. Risk Mitigation: Outsourcing can help spread risks by sharing them with external partners. By diversifying suppliers and service providers, companies and governments can mitigate risks associated with dependency on a single source or internal capabilities. 6. Global Expansion Opportunities: Outsourcing enables companies to expand globally by leveraging the capabilities and resources of vendors in different regions. Governments can facilitate international trade and partnerships to stimulate economic growth and foster innovation. 7. Effective Vendor Management: Successful outsourcing requires robust vendor management processes to ensure alignment with strategic objectives, quality standards, and regulatory compliance. Both companies and governments should invest in building strong partnerships and monitoring performance to maximize value from outsourcing arrangements. 8. Ethical Considerations: Companies and governments must consider ethical implications when outsourcing, including labor practices, environmental impact, and social responsibility. Transparency and accountability are crucial for maintaining trust with stakeholders and safeguarding reputation. By learning from P&G's outsourcing success, companies and governments can optimize their operations, enhance competitiveness, and achieve strategic objectives more effectively. However, it's essential to approach outsourcing strategically and consider its potential impacts on various stakeholders carefully. Solution Manual for Information Technology for Managers George W. Reynolds 9781305389830
