Preview Extract
CHAPTER 2 SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ESSAY QUESTIONS 1. Discuss the research method used in Demedicalization of Self-Injury and how it shaped the Adlers’ research. Answer: To discuss the research method used in the demedicalization of self-injury and how it shaped the Adlers' research, we need to understand both the concept of demedicalization and the specific methodologies employed by Patricia and Peter Adler in their study. 1. Understanding Demedicalization: Demedicalization refers to the process by which certain behaviors or conditions, once classified as medical problems, are redefined as non-medical issues. In the context of self-injury, this means shifting the perception of self-injurious behavior from a medical/psychiatric disorder to a behavior with social and psychological dimensions that can be understood outside of a purely medical framework. 2. Research Methodology: The Adlers utilized a qualitative research methodology, specifically employing ethnographic methods, to study the demedicalization of self-injury. This approach allowed them to delve deeply into the experiences and perspectives of individuals who engage in self-injury. Key aspects of their methodology included: • Participant Observation: The Adlers immersed themselves in environments where individuals who self-injure congregate, such as online forums and support groups. This allowed them to observe behaviors and interactions in a naturalistic setting. • In-depth Interviews: They conducted detailed interviews with individuals who self-injure, gathering personal narratives and insights into their experiences. These interviews helped to uncover the meanings and motivations behind self-injurious behavior from the participants' perspectives. • Document Analysis: The Adlers analyzed various documents, including online posts, diaries, and other personal writings related to self-injury. This provided additional context and depth to their understanding of the phenomenon. 3. How the Methodology Shaped the Research: The qualitative, ethnographic approach employed by the Adlers had several significant impacts on their research: • Rich, Detailed Data: The use of participant observation and in-depth interviews provided the Adlers with rich, nuanced data that captured the complexity of self-injury. This allowed them to present a more comprehensive and empathetic view of the behavior. • Empathy and Understanding: By engaging directly with individuals who self-injure, the Adlers were able to build trust and rapport, facilitating more open and honest communication. This empathetic approach helped them to uncover the social and psychological factors that contribute to self-injury, challenging the purely medical model. • Challenging Stigmatization: The Adlers' methodology allowed them to highlight the ways in which self-injury is often misunderstood and stigmatized. By presenting the voices and perspectives of those who self-injure, they contributed to a more nuanced and compassionate understanding of the behavior. • Theoretical Contributions: The data collected through their qualitative methods enabled the Adlers to develop theoretical insights into the process of demedicalization. They were able to explore how individuals resist medical labels and redefine their behaviors in non-medical terms, contributing to broader sociological discussions about the medicalization and demedicalization of deviant behavior. In conclusion, the research method used in the demedicalization of self-injury, characterized by qualitative, ethnographic techniques, played a crucial role in shaping the Adlers' research. It allowed them to gather rich, detailed data, build empathy and understanding, challenge stigmatization, and make significant theoretical contributions to the field of sociology. This approach not only deepened their insights into self-injury but also contributed to the broader discourse on the medicalization and demedicalization of behaviors. 2. Identify and briefly explain the five basic steps in the scientific method. Answer: The scientific method is a systematic, organized series of steps that ensures the objectivity and consistency of research. In sociology, this method is crucial for conducting research that yields reliable and valid results. The five basic steps in the scientific method are: 1. Defining the Problem: The first step is to clearly define the research problem or question. This involves identifying the issue to be studied and formulating a specific, focused question that guides the research. For instance, a sociologist might want to investigate the factors contributing to the increase in urban crime rates. 2. Reviewing the Literature: Once the problem is defined, the next step is to conduct a thorough review of existing literature on the topic. This involves examining previous studies, theories, and data to understand what is already known about the subject and identify gaps in the current knowledge. This step helps to refine the research question and develop a theoretical framework for the study. 3. Formulating a Hypothesis: Based on the literature review, the researcher formulates a hypothesis, which is a testable statement about the relationship between two or more variables. A hypothesis provides a clear direction for the research and helps to predict the expected outcomes. For example, a hypothesis might state that higher levels of education are associated with lower rates of crime. 4. Collecting and Analyzing Data: The fourth step involves designing a research plan to collect data that will test the hypothesis. This can include various methods such as surveys, experiments, observations, or secondary data analysis. Once the data is collected, it is analyzed using appropriate statistical or qualitative techniques to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or refuted. 5. Drawing Conclusions: The final step is to interpret the results of the data analysis and draw conclusions. This involves assessing whether the findings support the hypothesis and discussing the implications of the results for the original research question. The researcher also considers the limitations of the study and suggests areas for future research. The conclusions are then communicated through reports, articles, or presentations. By following these five steps, sociologists can conduct systematic and rigorous research that contributes to our understanding of social phenomena. 3. How is a sociological analysis of whether it pays to go to college different from a study conducted by a television station or magazine? Answer: A sociological analysis of whether it pays to go to college differs significantly from a study conducted by a television station or magazine in several key ways. These differences arise from the methodologies, objectives, and underlying perspectives of the analyses. 1. Methodology: Sociological Analysis: • Systematic and Rigorous: Sociological research employs systematic and rigorous methodologies. This typically includes defining a clear research question, conducting a thorough literature review, formulating hypotheses, and collecting and analyzing data using scientific methods. • Quantitative and Qualitative Data: Sociologists often use both quantitative data (such as statistics on employment rates, income levels, and student debt) and qualitative data (such as interviews and ethnographic studies) to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issue. • Peer Review: Sociological studies are often subjected to peer review, ensuring that the research methods and findings are scrutinized by other experts in the field for validity and reliability. Television Station or Magazine Study: • Simplified Methodology: Studies by television stations or magazines often use less rigorous methods. They might rely on surveys, polls, or interviews with a limited scope and sample size, aimed at quickly capturing public opinion or generating viewer/reader interest. • Anecdotal Evidence: These studies may emphasize anecdotal evidence and personal stories to make the topic more relatable and engaging for a general audience. • Limited Peer Review: These studies typically do not undergo the same level of peer review and academic scrutiny as sociological research. 2. Objectives: Sociological Analysis: • Understanding Social Patterns: The primary objective is to understand broader social patterns and structures. Sociologists examine how various factors such as socioeconomic status, race, gender, and public policy influence the costs and benefits of higher education. • Theory Development: Sociological research contributes to the development of theories that explain social phenomena and guide future research. Television Station or Magazine Study: • Audience Engagement: The main goal is to engage the audience and provide information that is interesting and relevant to their daily lives. This often means focusing on immediate and tangible outcomes, such as potential earnings or personal success stories. • Entertainment and Information: These studies aim to entertain as well as inform, which can sometimes lead to a more sensationalized or simplified presentation of the data. 3. Underlying Perspectives: Sociological Analysis: • Holistic Perspective: Sociologists approach the question from a holistic perspective, considering the interplay of various social, economic, and cultural factors. They are interested in both the individual and societal implications of higher education. • Critical Approach: Sociologists often adopt a critical approach, questioning the broader implications of education systems, such as issues of inequality, access, and the role of education in social mobility. Television Station or Magazine Study: • Consumer-Oriented Perspective: These studies tend to adopt a consumer-oriented perspective, focusing on practical advice and outcomes that are immediately relevant to the audience’s personal decision-making process. • Simplified Analysis: The analysis is often more simplified, aiming to provide clear and straightforward conclusions that can be easily communicated in a short segment or article. Conclusion: In summary, a sociological analysis of whether it pays to go to college is characterized by its rigorous methodology, broader objectives, and critical perspective. It seeks to provide a deep and comprehensive understanding of the issue within the context of social structures and patterns. In contrast, studies conducted by television stations or magazines are often designed to be more accessible and engaging for a general audience, with a focus on immediate, practical outcomes and personal stories. These differences highlight the distinct roles and contributions of academic and media-based approaches to understanding complex social issues. 4. Use functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism to define the issues related to whether or not it pays to go to college. Answer: To analyze whether or not it pays to go to college using the three main sociological perspectives—functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism—we can explore how each theoretical framework defines and interprets the issues related to higher education. Functionalism Perspective: Functionalism views society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote stability and social order. Each element of society, including education, has a function that contributes to the overall equilibrium of the system. Issues Related to College Education: 1. Social Integration and Cohesion: • Higher education institutions play a crucial role in integrating individuals into society by transmitting shared values, norms, and knowledge. • Colleges and universities help socialize students, preparing them for their roles in the workforce and as responsible citizens. 2. Skill Development and Economic Function: • From a functionalist perspective, college education equips individuals with the skills and knowledge needed for specialized occupations, thereby contributing to the economy. • The education system is seen as essential for creating a skilled labor force, which is necessary for economic growth and stability. 3. Meritocracy: • Functionalists argue that higher education promotes a meritocratic society where individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and achievements. • By providing opportunities for social mobility, education helps maintain social order and reduces inequality. Conflict Theory Perspective: Conflict theory, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, views society as composed of groups competing for limited resources. This perspective emphasizes the power struggles and inequalities inherent in social structures, including the education system. Issues Related to College Education: 1. Social Inequality: • Conflict theorists argue that higher education often reinforces existing social inequalities. Access to college education is frequently influenced by socioeconomic status, race, and other factors, leading to unequal opportunities. • Elite institutions may perpetuate privilege by favoring students from wealthy backgrounds, thereby maintaining the status quo. 2. Credentialism: • The emphasis on educational credentials can create a barrier to employment and social mobility for those who cannot afford higher education. • This credentialism can contribute to the stratification of society, where degrees become more important than actual skills or knowledge. 3. Economic Exploitation: • Higher education institutions may exploit students financially through high tuition fees, leading to substantial student debt. • Conflict theorists highlight how the education system can serve the interests of the ruling class by preparing a compliant workforce that sustains capitalist economies. Interactionism Perspective: Symbolic interactionism focuses on the daily interactions between individuals and the meanings they attach to these interactions. It examines how social processes and relationships influence behavior and identity. Issues Related to College Education: 1. Individual Experience: • Interactionists study how the college experience shapes individual identities and social interactions. • They explore how students' self-concepts are influenced by their academic performance, peer relationships, and interactions with faculty. 2. Symbolic Meanings: • The meaning of a college degree can vary widely among different social groups. For some, it represents a significant personal achievement, while for others, it may symbolize a necessary but burdensome step toward employment. • Interactionists analyze how these meanings affect students' motivation and perceptions of higher education's value. 3. Labeling and Stereotypes: • Interactionists examine how labels such as "college graduate" or "dropout" affect individuals' self-esteem and social standing. • They also investigate the impact of stereotypes related to intelligence, social class, and race on students' educational experiences and outcomes. Conclusion By applying functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism, we gain a multifaceted understanding of the issues related to whether it pays to go to college. Functionalism highlights the role of higher education in maintaining social stability and promoting economic development. Conflict theory emphasizes the inequalities and power dynamics within the education system. Interactionism focuses on the individual experiences and symbolic meanings associated with college education. Together, these perspectives provide a comprehensive analysis of the complex and multifaceted nature of higher education's value in society. 5. Distinguish among independent variables, dependent variables, causal logic, and correlations. Answer: Independent Variables Definition: An independent variable is the variable that is manipulated or varied to observe its effect on another variable. It is considered the cause. Example: In a study on education's impact on income, the level of education (e.g., high school, bachelor's degree) is the independent variable. Dependent Variables Definition: A dependent variable is the variable that is measured to assess the effect of the independent variable. It is considered the outcome. Example: In the same study, the income level (e.g., annual salary) is the dependent variable. Causal Logic Definition: Causal logic refers to the reasoning that identifies a cause-and-effect relationship between variables, showing that changes in the independent variable lead to changes in the dependent variable. Example: If higher education leads to higher income, causal logic establishes that increased education precedes and causes increased income. Correlations Definition: Correlation measures the relationship between two variables, indicating how they change together. It can be positive, negative, or zero but does not imply causation. Example: A positive correlation between hours studied and exam scores shows that students who study more tend to score higher, but it doesn't prove studying causes higher scores. Distinctions • Independent vs. Dependent Variables: Independent variables cause changes; dependent variables are affected by those changes. • Causal Logic vs. Correlation: Causal logic shows cause and effect; correlation shows a relationship without proving causation. 6. Explain why the surveys conducted by radio and television stations, in which viewers and listeners are encouraged to place “800” and “900” calls to give their views, do not use a representative sample. Answer: Surveys conducted by radio and television stations using "800" and "900" calls do not use a representative sample due to the following reasons: 1. Self-Selection Bias: Only motivated individuals with strong opinions choose to call, skewing the results. 2. Lack of Random Sampling: Participation is voluntary, not randomly selected, so it doesn't represent the general population. 3. Demographic Limitations: Callers may belong to specific demographic groups, not reflecting the broader audience. 4. Economic Barrier: "900" numbers often incur charges, deterring lower-income individuals from participating. 5. Response Bias: Extreme opinions are overrepresented as indifferent individuals are less likely to call in. These factors result in a biased sample that does not accurately reflect the views of the entire audience. 7. Explain the difference between validity and reliability. Answer: Validity and reliability are crucial concepts in sociological research, each addressing different aspects of measurement. Validity Definition: Validity refers to the accuracy of a measurement, or whether the research truly measures what it intends to measure. Example: If a survey aims to assess students' academic ability, it should include questions that accurately reflect their knowledge and skills, rather than unrelated factors. Reliability Definition: Reliability refers to the consistency of a measurement, or whether the same results can be obtained repeatedly under the same conditions. Example: If a test on students' academic ability is reliable, it should yield the same results when administered to the same group of students under similar circumstances. Key Difference • Validity is about accuracy (correctly measuring the intended concept). • Reliability is about consistency (producing stable and consistent results over time). Both are essential for ensuring the credibility and usefulness of research findings. 8. Why are control variables useful in testing hypotheses? Answer: Control variables are useful in testing hypotheses because they help researchers isolate and understand the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. By holding these variables constant, researchers can determine whether changes in the independent variable truly cause changes in the dependent variable, without interference from other factors. Control variables enhance the validity and reliability of the study by reducing confounding variables and improving the accuracy of the results. 9. Explain how sociological research methods would be useful in conducting a poll in Baghdad. Answer: Sociological research methods would be useful in conducting a poll in Baghdad by providing a systematic approach to gathering and analyzing data. Techniques such as surveys, interviews, and observations could be used to collect information on a range of social issues, including political opinions, social attitudes, and cultural practices. By employing sociological methods, researchers can ensure the reliability and validity of the poll results, helping to accurately capture the views and experiences of the people in Baghdad. 10. Identify and briefly describe the four different types of research designs for collecting data presented in the text. Answer: The four types of research designs for collecting data in sociology are: 1. Cross-sectional Design: This involves collecting data at a single point in time from a sample that represents a larger population. It provides a snapshot of the population's characteristics and can identify patterns or relationships. 2. Longitudinal Design: This design involves collecting data from the same sample repeatedly over a period of time. It allows researchers to study changes and trends over time, providing a deeper understanding of how variables are related. 3. Trend Study: Trend studies involve repeated cross-sectional surveys of different samples from the same population. They are useful for studying changes in attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes over time within a population. 4. Panel Study: Panel studies involve collecting data from the same group of individuals (the panel) over time. This allows researchers to track individual changes and examine cause-and-effect relationships more effectively. 11. Why is the framing of survey questions an important issue? Answer: The framing of survey questions is important because it can influence respondents' answers. The way a question is phrased can lead respondents to interpret it in different ways or bias their responses. Thus, careful framing is essential to ensure the accuracy and reliability of survey results. 12. What are the advantages of interviews and questionnaires as forms of survey research? Answer: Interviews and questionnaires offer several advantages as forms of survey research: 1. Depth of Information: Interviews allow for in-depth exploration of topics, providing rich, detailed responses. Questionnaires can collect a large amount of data from a large number of people. 2. Flexibility: Interviews can adapt to respondents' answers, allowing for follow-up questions to clarify responses. Questionnaires offer flexibility in timing and can be completed at the respondent's convenience. 3. Insight into Behavior: Interviews can reveal underlying motives and behaviors. Questionnaires can gather information on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. 4. Standardization: Questionnaires allow for standardized questions, ensuring consistency in data collection and analysis. Interviews can be standardized to a certain extent through structured formats. 5. Cost-Effectiveness: Questionnaires are often more cost-effective for large-scale surveys, while interviews can be costly due to the need for trained interviewers. Overall, interviews and questionnaires complement each other, offering researchers diverse methods to collect data and analyze social phenomena. 13. What are the strengths and difficulties of the observation method of research? Answer: The observation method of research offers strengths such as: 1. Naturalistic Setting: Observations can be conducted in real-life settings, providing a more authentic understanding of behavior. 2. Behavioral Insight: Observations can reveal nuances of behavior that may not be captured through other methods like surveys or interviews. 3. Non-Verbal Communication: Observations allow for the study of non-verbal cues and interactions, providing additional insights into social dynamics. However, the observation method also presents difficulties such as: 1. Observer Bias: Researchers' preconceived notions or interpretations can influence observations, leading to biased results. 2. Limited Generalizability: Findings from observations in specific settings may not be easily generalized to larger populations or different contexts. 3. Ethical Concerns: Observational research may raise ethical concerns regarding privacy and consent, especially in public or sensitive settings. 14. Which type of sociological research is considered to be better, qualitative or quantitative? Answer: There is no definitive answer to whether qualitative or quantitative research is better in sociology. Both approaches have strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them often depends on the research question, objectives, and context of the study. Qualitative research is valuable for exploring complex social phenomena, understanding meanings, and capturing the richness of human experiences. It often involves in-depth interviews, observations, and analysis of texts or artifacts. However, it can be time-consuming, subjective, and challenging to generalize findings. Quantitative research uses numerical data and statistical analysis to identify patterns, test hypotheses, and make predictions. It provides precise measurements, allows for statistical comparisons, and is often more easily replicable. However, it may oversimplify complex social issues and overlook important contextual factors. In practice, many sociologists use a combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods, known as mixed-methods research, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of social phenomena. The choice of method should be guided by the research question and the need to address it effectively. 15. What conclusions can be drawn from William F. Whyte’s participant observation research in a low-income neighborhood? Answer: William F. Whyte's participant observation research in a low-income neighborhood, as documented in his book "Street Corner Society," offers several conclusions: 1. Complex Social Structures: Whyte highlighted the complex social structures within the neighborhood, including the formation of social networks, hierarchies, and informal rules. 2. Role of Informal Economy: He showed the significant role of the informal economy, such as street vendors and informal employment, in the lives of residents. 3. Impact of Social Class: The research highlighted the impact of social class on behavior, relationships, and opportunities within the neighborhood. 4. Community Dynamics: Whyte's work emphasized the importance of community dynamics, including social ties, norms, and values, in shaping individual behavior and perceptions. 5. Implications for Policy: His research underscored the need for policymakers to consider the social context and community dynamics when designing interventions or policies for low-income neighborhoods. Overall, Whyte's participant observation research provided valuable insights into the social life of a low-income neighborhood, highlighting the complexity and richness of community dynamics in such environments. 16. Explain the origin of the Hawthorne effect and its significance for researchers. Answer: The Hawthorne effect originated from a series of studies conducted at the Hawthorne Works plant of Western Electric in the 1920s and 1930s. The studies aimed to investigate the relationship between workplace conditions and productivity. Researchers found that productivity increased not as a result of changes in working conditions, but due to the mere fact that workers were being studied and felt more valued and motivated as a result. The significance of the Hawthorne effect for researchers is that it highlights the impact of observation on behavior. It suggests that people may modify their behavior or performance simply because they are aware of being studied, rather than in response to the specific changes being tested. This has implications for research design and interpretation, emphasizing the need to consider and control for the potential influence of observation in studies involving human subjects. 17. In what types of situations do researchers find secondary analysis useful? Answer: Researchers find secondary analysis useful in various situations, including: 1. Cost-Effectiveness: Secondary analysis allows researchers to access existing data sets without the cost and time involved in collecting new data. 2. Longitudinal Studies: Researchers can use secondary data from longitudinal studies to examine trends and changes over time. 3. Comparative Studies: Secondary analysis enables researchers to compare different data sets, such as across countries or regions, to identify similarities and differences. 4. Validation: Researchers can use secondary data to validate findings from primary research or to test new hypotheses. 5. Access to Large Samples: Secondary data often provides access to large samples, which can enhance the statistical power of studies and allow for subgroup analyses. 18. What are the principles put forth by the American Sociological Association in its Code of Ethics? Answer: The American Sociological Association (ASA) Code of Ethics outlines several key principles for ethical conduct in sociological research, including: 1. Professional Competence: Sociologists should strive to maintain the highest level of competence in their work. 2. Integrity: Sociologists should be honest and transparent in their research practices, including the reporting of findings. 3. Professional and Scientific Responsibility: Sociologists have a responsibility to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and to respect the rights and dignity of individuals. 4. Respect for People's Rights, Dignity, and Diversity: Sociologists should respect the rights, dignity, and diversity of individuals and groups, including protecting their privacy and confidentiality. 5. Social Responsibility: Sociologists should use their knowledge and skills to promote social justice and the well-being of society. These principles guide sociologists in conducting research that is ethical, responsible, and respectful of the rights and welfare of others. 19. How does the research by Rik Scarce show the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of sources in observation research? Answer: Rik Scarce's research, particularly in his book "Eco terror: The Violent Agenda to Save Nature," demonstrates the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of sources in observation research. Scarce used participant observation to study environmental activists, some of whom were engaged in illegal activities. By promising confidentiality to his sources, Scarce was able to gain access to sensitive information and gain a deeper understanding of the activists' motivations and actions. This underscores the importance of confidentiality in building trust with research participants and obtaining valuable insights that might otherwise be inaccessible. 20. Describe the ideal of value neutrality as developed by Max Weber. Answer: Max Weber's concept of value neutrality, or "Wertfreiheit," emphasizes that sociologists should conduct research without allowing their personal biases, values, or political beliefs to influence their findings. Weber argued that social scientists must strive to separate their subjective values from their scientific analysis to ensure objective and unbiased results. This ideal requires researchers to be self-aware and reflective, recognizing their own potential biases and actively working to minimize their impact on their work. By adhering to value neutrality, sociologists can produce more credible and reliable research that contributes to the objective understanding of social phenomena. 21. Summarize the views of Joyce Ladner and Shulamit Reinharz with respect to value neutrality. Answer: Joyce Ladner and Shulamit Reinharz challenge the notion of value neutrality in sociological research. Joyce Ladner argues that value neutrality is unrealistic and that sociologists should acknowledge their biases and use their research to address social injustices. She believes that researchers have a responsibility to advocate for marginalized groups and promote social change. Shulamit Reinharz also criticizes value neutrality, particularly from a feminist perspective. She contends that traditional approaches to sociological research have often ignored or misrepresented women's experiences. Reinharz advocates for research that is explicitly committed to social justice and that incorporates the perspectives and voices of those who are often excluded from mainstream sociological studies. Both Ladner and Reinharz emphasize that sociological research should be aware of its values and actively work towards social equity. 22. What are the ethical concerns of receiving funding from corporate sources? Answer: Receiving funding from corporate sources in sociological research raises several ethical concerns. First, there is the potential for bias, as corporations may influence research outcomes to favor their interests, undermining the objectivity and integrity of the study. Second, there is a risk of conflicts of interest, where the researcher’s dependence on corporate funding might compromise their ability to conduct independent and critical analysis. Third, there is the issue of transparency, where the public may question the credibility of the research if the funding sources and their potential influence are not disclosed. Lastly, ethical concerns also include the potential for limiting the scope of research topics, as corporate funders might only support studies that align with their goals, thereby restricting academic freedom and the pursuit of knowledge in broader, potentially more critical areas. 23. What has been the impact of technology on sociological research? Answer: Technology has significantly impacted sociological research in several ways. First, it has enhanced data collection methods through online surveys, social media analysis, and big data analytics, allowing researchers to gather vast amounts of data quickly and efficiently. Second, technology has improved data analysis capabilities with advanced software and computational tools that enable complex statistical analyses and simulations. Third, it has facilitated better communication and collaboration among researchers worldwide through digital platforms and virtual meetings. Lastly, technology has increased access to information and resources, with online databases and digital libraries providing a wealth of academic literature and data for sociological inquiry. Overall, technology has made sociological research more comprehensive, efficient, and collaborative. 24. Why is it important for sociologists to do studies of human sexuality? Answer: It is important for sociologists to study human sexuality because it is a fundamental aspect of human life that influences and is influenced by various social, cultural, and institutional factors. Studying human sexuality helps sociologists understand diverse sexual behaviors, identities, and orientations, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of human social behavior. It also sheds light on issues such as gender roles, sexual health, and the impact of societal norms and policies on individuals' sexual lives. Furthermore, research in this area can inform public policy, education, and health services, promoting social justice and improving the well-being of individuals and communities. By examining human sexuality, sociologists can address and challenge stigma and discrimination, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society. CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS 1. Discuss how social research may affect the quality of human life. Include an explanation of how dispelling social myths could be considered by some critics as a threat to social order. Answer: Social research can significantly affect the quality of human life by providing evidence-based insights that inform public policy, enhance social programs, and promote social justice. By uncovering the root causes of social issues, such as poverty, discrimination, and health disparities, sociologists can recommend solutions that lead to improved living conditions and greater social equality. However, dispelling social myths through research can be seen as a threat to social order by some critics. This is because challenging widely held beliefs and norms can disrupt established power structures and social cohesion, leading to resistance or backlash from those who benefit from maintaining the status quo. Nonetheless, confronting these myths is essential for fostering a more informed, equitable, and progressive society. 2. Consider various ways in which you might try to disguise your identity in performing a participant observation study of street gangs, and whether or not it would be ethical to do so. Discuss the value of obtaining qualitative data compared to obtaining quantitative data. Answer: Disguising one's identity in a participant observation study of street gangs can involve adopting a false name, altering one's appearance, and immersing oneself in the gang's culture to gain trust and access. While this can yield valuable insights, it raises ethical concerns about deception and the potential harm to both the researcher and the participants. Informed consent and maintaining trust are crucial ethical principles that may be compromised by such deception. Obtaining qualitative data in this context provides rich, detailed insights into the lived experiences, social dynamics, and cultural norms of gang members. This type of data can reveal the complexities and nuances of gang life that quantitative data might overlook. On the other hand, quantitative data, such as statistics on gang activity and demographics, can offer broader, generalizable findings that can inform policy and intervention programs. Both types of data are valuable, but qualitative data is particularly important for understanding the deeper, context-specific aspects of street gangs, while quantitative data helps to identify larger trends and patterns. 3. Provide examples of any societal dangers that might occur when the results of poor research are publicized. Can you recall any recent instances of this? Answer: When poor research is publicized, it can lead to societal dangers such as misinformation, public panic, and misguided policies. For example, flawed studies on vaccine safety have contributed to vaccine hesitancy, leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases like measles. Similarly, research with biased or inaccurate findings on crime rates can exacerbate racial stereotypes and unjust policies. A recent instance is the controversy over hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. Early, poorly conducted studies suggested it was effective, leading to widespread use despite a lack of robust evidence. This not only diverted resources from more effective treatments but also caused potential harm to patients and public mistrust in scientific research. This underscores the importance of rigorous, reliable research and the careful dissemination of findings to avoid detrimental societal impacts. 4. Discuss how social research could provide assistance in fighting the war on terrorism. What type of research design would one employ to research terrorism? Answer: Social research can play a crucial role in fighting the war on terrorism by providing insights into the root causes, motivations, and social dynamics of terrorism. It can help identify factors that contribute to radicalization, such as social inequality, political grievances, and cultural conflicts, and inform policies aimed at prevention and intervention. To research terrorism, one might employ a mixed-methods research design, combining both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Qualitative methods, such as in-depth interviews and ethnographic studies, can provide a deeper understanding of individual and group motivations, recruitment strategies, and the social contexts that foster terrorism. Quantitative methods, such as surveys and statistical analysis, can identify patterns and trends in terrorist activities, demographics of terrorists, and the effectiveness of counter-terrorism measures. Using a mixed-methods approach allows for a comprehensive analysis, integrating detailed, context-specific insights with broad, generalizable data, ultimately informing more effective strategies to combat terrorism. 5. Describe how social research could aid in the passage of laws and potentially prevent the enactment of poor laws. Answer: Social research can aid in the passage of laws and prevent the enactment of poor laws by providing evidence-based insights into social issues and the potential impacts of legislation. By systematically studying the needs, behaviors, and outcomes within a society, researchers can inform lawmakers about the most effective and equitable solutions to social problems. For instance, research on poverty and inequality can highlight the root causes of these issues, suggesting targeted policies that address underlying factors rather than just symptoms. Similarly, studies on criminal justice can reveal the effects of various legal approaches on crime rates, recidivism, and community well-being, guiding the creation of fair and effective laws. Social research can also identify unintended consequences of proposed laws, helping to refine or abandon policies that may cause harm. For example, research on drug policies has shown that punitive measures often exacerbate problems rather than solve them, leading to a shift towards more rehabilitative and preventative approaches. Overall, by grounding legislation in robust, empirical evidence, social research helps ensure that laws are effective, just, and beneficial to society, while minimizing the risk of enacting poorly conceived laws. TOPICS AND SOURCES FOR STUDENT RESEARCH AND ASSIGNMENTS 1. Social Theory: See Robert K. Merton, “The Bearing of Empirical Research upon the Development of Social Theory,” American Sociological Review 12 (October 1969): 505–515. 2. Content Analysis—Comic Superheroes: See Thomas Young, “Are Comic Book Superheroes Sexist?” Sociology and Social Research 75 (July 1991): 218. 3. Content Analysis—Newspapers: See Ben M. Crouch and Kelly R. Damphouse, “Newspapers and the Antisatanism Movement: A Content Analysis,” Sociological Spectrum 12 (January-March 1992): 1-20. 4. Feminist Methodology: See Marjorie L. DeVault, “Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology.” In John Hagan (ed.). Annual Review of Sociology 1996. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1996, pp. 29–50. 5. Institute for Social Research: Focus Newsletter and Insight are two publications issued at regular intervals that are available from the Institute for Social Research. To be placed on the mailing list, write to the Institute at 1180 Observation Drive, 3412 Social Science Building, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. VIDEO RESOURCE SECTION Doing Sociological Research (Films for the Humanities and Sciences; 2007; 37 minutes). This film uses the topic of education to explore the research process. Margaret Mead: An Observer Observed (Filmakers Library, 2002, 85m). This film offers a broad examination of the life and work of Margaret Mead. It deals with the entire span of her long research career, including her initial ethnographic work in Samoa and New Guinea. Portraits in Human Sexuality: The Business of Sex (Films for the Humanities and Sciences; 2006; 34 minutes). This documentary considers the lives of sex workers in three industries – adult stores; phone sex; and strip clubs. Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Horizon Film and Video, 1995, 30m). An introduction to research methods that covers gathering data, types of experimental designs, and use of control groups. Scientific Method and Values (1993, 34m). This film examines the development of scientific methods, looking at the contributions of Newton, Darwin, and Curie. Sociological Inquiry (Insight Media, 2002, 30m). This video gives a basic overview of various types of sociological research methods, applying them to the study of groups. Sociological Thinking and Research (Dallas Community College, 1991, 31m). The program describes how to structure a research study by defining the problem to be studied, reviewing the relevant literature, formulating a hypothesis, and selecting a research design. Sociologist William Kornblum explains his methods for studying the effects of planned renewal on the neighborhood around Times Square. The importance of going beyond common sense in developing sociological theory is emphasized. Statistics (1988, 20m). This film discusses average, mean, median, and mode. It also questions the statement that statistics can be misleading. Statistics: For All Practical Purposes (Insight Media, 1988, 5 x 30m). This series of five short videos introduces students to the statistical techniques used by sociologists. It deals with the entire research process, from data collection to analysis. Writing for the Social Sciences (Insight Media, 1991, 30m). This video prepares students for the process of writing social science papers. It includes interviews with authors in the social sciences. ADDITIONAL READINGS American Sociological Association. 1997. Style Guide, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASA. This concise handbook (39 pages) provides guidance in writing clearly, as well as citation format, including referencing electronic sources such as the Internet. Best, Joel. 2001. Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists. Berkeley: University of California Press. A sociologist demonstrates the value of careful interpretation of data, but also shows how statistics can be used to mislead people about social issues. Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The 40 articles in this anthology cover newer techniques used in conducting observation and biographical research, as well as ethical issues facing researchers. Erickson, Julia A. 1999. Kiss and Tell: Surveying Sex in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. This text evaluates the methodology of the hundreds of surveys of human sexuality conducted by sociologists and other social scientists. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point. Boston: Little, Brown. A journalist examines how certain benchmarks or milestones are portrayed in news-breaking stories, such as drops in crime, the impact of smoking, and the influence of children’s television programming. Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein, eds. 2001. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Drawing on a variety of disciplines, the editors examine all facets of appropriate interview techniques. Huff, Darrell. 1954. How to Lie with Statistics. New York: Norton. “Figures don’t lie, but liars do figure” is an adage that points to the way that statistics can be abused. In this classic book, Huff offers guidance to the reader in how to better understand numbers, graphs, and tables. Paulos, John Allen. 1988. Innumeracy. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. This brief book considers how important basic mathematics is in everyday life. van den Hoonaard, Will C., ed. 2002. Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. This is multi-disciplinary assessment of the special ethical considerations in qualitative research. Contributors to the volume draw on their own research encounters with ethical issues. JOURNALS Among the journals that focus on methods of sociological and other social scientific research are the following: IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research (founded in 1979), Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (1971), Qualitative Sociology (1977), Social Science Research (1972), and Sociological Methods and Research (1972). Many sociological journals are now available on the Internet, but one specific journal on research is available only online. You can locate Sociological Research Online at www.socresonline.org.uk. Solution Manual for Sociology Richard T. Schaefer 9780078026669
