Preview (9 of 29 pages)

Preview Extract

This Document Contains Chapters 15 to 16 Chapter 15: Mental Disorder and the Law Test Questions Part I. Multiple Choice Questions Circle the response that best answers the following questions. 1) The legal doctrine of __________ allows the mentally ill to be confined on the basis of predicted danger to themselves or others. A) de jure B) parens patriae C) parentis confirm D) insaniae danger Answer: B 2) Legally, the state can involuntarily commit a mentally ill person because mental illness and __________ are so closely linked. A) authority B) benevolence C) confinement D) dangerousness Answer: D 3) Involuntary civil commitment is justified on any one of the following groups, except __________. A) need for treatment B) danger to others C) danger to self D) need for rehabilitation Answer: D 4) Only one state, __________, specifically defines a “dangerous” person. A) Ohio B) Oklahoma C) Utah D) Texas Answer: B 5) If an individual is unable to secure his/her own food and is unable to feed him/herself, s/he can be classified as __________. A) in need of treatment B) a danger to others C) a danger to him/herself D) in need of protection Answer: C 6) Which of the following statements is accurate regarding legally defining danger to others? A) What is most important is the degree of harm, rather than the activity itself. B) Danger to others is always defined as actual behavior, not the threat of such behavior. C) The mentally ill cannot be held responsible for harm to others if their disorder is severe enough. D) The activity must be life-threatening to be adequately classified as dangerous to others. Answer: A 7) In criminal cases, danger to others must occur within __________. A) one year B) the month C) the foreseeable future D) less than ten days Answer: C 8) Most courts view dangerousness as the combination of the magnitude of the harm and __________. A) the time frame for harm B) the predictors of hard C) the person who is harmed D) the likelihood of harm Answer: D 9) Shooting a police officer, breaking and entering, and exhibitionism are examples of what courts have found to be __________ of dangerousness in civil commitment cases. A) preponderance-of-the-evidence B) hybrid procedure C) clear and convincing evidence D) reasonable doubt Answer: C 10) Psychologists are often used as expert witnesses in cases of commitment. However, __________. A) few psychologists are willing to participate B) no accurate tests have been developed to predict dangerousness C) clinical symptoms are different than civil symptoms D) past dangerous behavior does not predict future dangerous behavior Answer: B 11) Early studies of discharged mental patients found that they were __________. A) not any more dangerous than the general population B) equally as dangerous as the general population C) more dangerous than the general population D) sometimes more dangerous than the general population Answer: A 12) Which of the following conclusions is accurate about the dangerousness of mentally disordered people? A) Mentally disordered people are significantly more dangerous than the general population. B) Mentally disordered people are slightly more dangerous than the general population in regard to certain crimes. C) Mentally disordered people are significantly less dangerous than the general population. D) Mentally disordered people are equally as dangerous as the general population. Answer: B 13) Ex-mental patients are arrested __________ than the general population. A) more B) less C) more, but only for males D) less, but only for females Answer: A 14) The __________ holds that it is better to judge a well person sick than a sick person well. A) medical decision rule B) over prediction norm C) uncertainty diagnosis D) dangerous rule Answer: A 15) The most important factor in a psychiatrist’s decision to commit an individual is __________. A) the time frame of the offense B) the alleged offense C) the likelihood of a false positive D) the individual’s defense Answer: B 16) In Cocozza and Steadman research, they found that the recommendations of psychiatrists were accepted in __________ percent of cases. A) 22 B) 45 C) 61 D) 87 Answer: D 17) Early commitment laws were __________. A) nonexistent B) too complex to understand C) varied by state D) the same as today Answer: A 18) Which of the following statements represents the insanity defense? A) “I committed the crime, but someone else made me do it.” B) “I committed the crime, but am not responsible for my actions.” C) “I did not commit the crime.” D) “I am not able to commit crimes because I do not understand the law.” Answer: B 19) The first case that used the insanity defense in the United States was in __________. A) 1701 B) 1799 C) 1843 D) 1908 Answer: C 20) In 1954, the M’Nagthen rule was superseded by the __________ rule, which offered a broader test of mental disorder. A) impulse B) Bobbitt C) matter-of-fact D) Durham Answer: D 21) The Insanity Defense Reform Act requires that the __________. A) defendant must prove s/he was insane at the time of the crime B) defendant must prove that s/he is currently insane C) plaintiff must prove that the defendant was insane at the time of the crime D) plaintiff must prove that the defendant is currently insane Answer: A 22) The 1966 Rouse v. Cameron case confirmed that __________. A) mental patients have the right to be confined if necessary B) hospitals need only provide custody C) mental patients may demand therapy D) hospitals must be therapeutic and not only custodial Answer: D 23) Social control of the mentally disordered is dependent upon __________ judgments of the deviant behavior. A) subjective B) objective C) systematic D) inexact Answer: A 24) Ex Parte Harcourt stated that there must be more than __________ possibility that the person will be a danger if allowed to remain at large. A) a big B) some C) a mere D) any Answer: C 25) Why is a reliance of psychiatrists’ clinical judgment inadequate for civil commitment? A) Psychiatrists are paid for their testimonies B) Psychiatrists are by nature untrustworthy C) Judgments are based on opinions and not facts D) Judgments are too objective Answer: C Part II. Essay Questions Answer the following questions in your own words. 1) How is dangerousness defined? Answer: Dangerousness, especially in the context of mental health and legal considerations, is typically defined as the likelihood or risk that an individual poses a threat of harm to themselves or others. This definition can vary depending on the specific legal or clinical context, but generally, dangerousness may be assessed and interpreted through several key factors: 1. Risk of Harm to Self: This includes the likelihood that an individual may engage in behaviors that pose a risk of self-harm or suicide. It can involve assessing suicidal ideation, intent, and past history of self-harm. 2. Risk of Harm to Others: This refers to the likelihood that an individual may engage in behaviors that threaten the safety or well-being of others. It involves assessing potential for violence, aggression, or harm directed towards others based on past behavior, threats made, or observed indicators. 3. Severity and Imminence: Evaluations of dangerousness consider both the severity of potential harm and the immediacy or imminence of the risk. Factors such as the presence of weapons, access to means of harm, and escalation of threatening behaviors are taken into account. 4. Clinical Assessment: Mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers, conduct clinical assessments to evaluate dangerousness. They may use structured interviews, standardized risk assessment tools, and clinical judgment to assess factors such as impulsivity, agitation, psychosis, and insight into one's condition. 5. Legal Standards: In legal contexts, dangerousness may be assessed according to specific legal standards or criteria established by statutes or case law. These standards often influence decisions regarding involuntary commitment, civil commitment proceedings, or imposition of legal sanctions based on mental health issues. 6. Contextual Factors: Assessments of dangerousness consider contextual factors such as the individual's social environment, support systems, history of substance abuse, compliance with treatment, and ability to manage stressors or triggers. Overall, the determination of dangerousness involves a complex evaluation of multiple factors, requiring careful consideration of clinical, legal, and ethical dimensions to ensure appropriate intervention and protection of individuals and others in the community. 2) Describe the history of the insanity defense. Answer: The insanity defense is a legal concept that allows individuals charged with crimes to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions due to a mental illness or defect. The history of the insanity defense spans centuries and has evolved significantly over time: 1. Early Developments (Ancient and Medieval Times): • Early legal systems, such as those in ancient Greece and Rome, did not recognize the concept of insanity as a defense. Instead, individuals deemed unfit to stand trial due to mental incapacity might have been spared punishment but were often subjected to other forms of social control or confinement. • In medieval Europe, religious and moral explanations often framed deviations from normative behavior as manifestations of sin or possession rather than mental illness. 2. M'Naghten Case (1843): • One of the most influential cases in the development of the insanity defense occurred in England in 1843. Daniel M'Naghten was acquitted of murder after his defense successfully argued that he was insane at the time of the crime. • The M'Naghten Rule, established as a result of this case, became a foundational standard for the insanity defense. It states that a defendant can be found not guilty by reason of insanity if, at the time of the crime, they were laboring under such a defect of reason from a disease of the mind that they did not know the nature and quality of the act they were doing, or if they did know it, they did not know that what they were doing was wrong. 3. American Adoption and Evolution: • The M'Naghten Rule greatly influenced the development of the insanity defense in the United States. Early American courts largely adopted similar standards, with variations across states. • Over time, other standards emerged, such as the Durham Rule (1954), which focused on whether the crime was a product of the defendant's mental illness, and the Model Penal Code (1962), which provided a broader test including whether the defendant lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of their conduct or conform their conduct to the requirements of law. 4. Criticism and Reform: • The insanity defense has faced criticism for its subjectivity, potential for misuse, and perceived leniency toward defendants. • High-profile cases, such as John Hinckley Jr.'s attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan in 1981, led to public and legal debates about the adequacy and fairness of insanity defense standards. • Some jurisdictions have enacted reforms to restrict the use of the insanity defense or to clarify standards for adjudicating mental health issues in criminal cases. 5. Current Standards and Variations: • Today, the insanity defense remains a complex and varied concept across different jurisdictions. States in the U.S. may use different standards or variations of the insanity defense, ranging from strict adherence to the M'Naghten Rule to broader tests based on cognitive and volitional impairment. • Some jurisdictions have shifted toward focusing on the defendant's ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law at the time of the offense. In conclusion, the insanity defense has evolved significantly from its historical origins to encompass varying standards and interpretations across legal systems. Its application continues to be shaped by ongoing legal, ethical, and societal debates regarding mental illness, criminal responsibility, and justice. 3) What is the legal doctrine of parens patriae? Answer: The legal doctrine of parens patriae is a Latin term that translates to "parent of the country" in English. It refers to the inherent power and authority of the state to intervene on behalf of individuals who are unable to care for themselves, particularly vulnerable populations such as minors, individuals with disabilities, and those with mental illnesses. The doctrine originates from English common law and has been adopted into various legal systems, including the United States. Key aspects of the doctrine of parens patriae include: 1. Protection of Individuals: The doctrine allows the state to step in and provide care, protection, and supervision for individuals who are unable to care for themselves adequately. This may include individuals who are minors, incapacitated due to mental illness, or otherwise unable to make decisions for their own welfare. 2. Intervention in Legal Matters: Under parens patriae, the state may intervene in legal proceedings to protect the rights and interests of individuals who are considered legally incompetent or incapable of representing themselves. This could involve guardianship proceedings, involuntary commitment for mental health treatment, or decisions regarding custody and care. 3. Historical Context: Historically, parens patriae was primarily applied to protect the interests of minors and individuals with disabilities. Over time, its application has expanded to include individuals with mental illnesses who may require involuntary treatment or protective supervision to prevent harm to themselves or others. 4. Balance of State Authority and Individual Rights: The exercise of parens patriae authority is subject to legal and constitutional safeguards to balance state intervention with protection of individual rights. Courts and legislatures establish criteria and procedural safeguards to ensure that interventions are justified, necessary, and least restrictive. 5. Modern Application: In modern legal contexts, parens patriae is invoked in various areas of law, including family law, mental health law, juvenile justice, and social services. It reflects the state's role in promoting the welfare and well-being of vulnerable individuals who may lack the capacity to make informed decisions or protect their own interests. Overall, the doctrine of parens patriae underscores the state's responsibility to act as a protector and advocate for individuals who are unable to advocate for themselves due to age, disability, or mental incapacity. It is a fundamental principle in the administration of justice and social welfare, ensuring that vulnerable populations receive necessary care and support under the authority of the state. 4) Why is dangerousness difficult to predict? Answer: Dangerousness, particularly in the context of predicting whether someone may pose a risk of harm to themselves or others due to mental illness or other factors, is difficult to predict for several reasons: 1. Complexity of Human Behavior: Human behavior is influenced by a myriad of factors, including psychological, social, environmental, and situational variables. Predicting how these factors interact and manifest in specific behaviors related to violence or self-harm is inherently complex. 2. Individual Differences: Each person is unique, and factors contributing to dangerousness can vary widely among individuals. What may lead one person to act violently under certain circumstances may not apply to another person facing similar conditions. 3. Dynamic Nature of Mental Health: Mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression, can fluctuate over time. Predicting dangerousness requires consideration of how symptoms, treatment adherence, and stressors may impact behavior at different points in time. 4. Limited Predictive Tools: While there are risk assessment tools and clinical guidelines to aid in evaluating dangerousness, these tools have limitations. They rely on historical data, self-reporting, and clinical judgment, which may not always accurately predict future behavior. 5. Rare Events: Violent acts, especially those resulting in serious harm or death, are relatively rare in the general population. This rarity makes it challenging to develop precise statistical models or algorithms that reliably predict dangerous behavior. 6. Ethical and Legal Constraints: There are ethical and legal implications in making predictions about dangerousness. Balancing the duty to protect public safety with respecting individual rights and autonomy requires careful consideration and adherence to legal standards. 7. Contextual Factors: Dangerousness can be influenced by situational factors, such as access to weapons, substance use, exposure to violence, and changes in social support networks. These factors can significantly alter the likelihood of harmful behavior but may not be consistently accounted for in predictive models. 8. Stigma and Bias: The stigma associated with mental illness and assumptions about dangerousness can affect how individuals are perceived and treated. This can impact risk assessments and decision-making processes, leading to biases that may not accurately reflect actual risk. In summary, predicting dangerousness is a challenging task that involves navigating complex psychological, social, and environmental factors while considering the limitations of available tools and ethical considerations. While efforts continue to improve risk assessment and intervention strategies, predicting individual behavior remains an imperfect science that requires ongoing research, clinical expertise, and thoughtful application in practice. 5) Describe a patient’s right to treatment. Answer: A patient's right to treatment encompasses several fundamental principles and legal protections that ensure individuals receive appropriate and timely medical care, including mental health treatment. While specific rights may vary by jurisdiction and healthcare setting, the following principles generally define a patient's right to treatment: 1. Access to Care: Patients have the right to access necessary medical and mental health services based on their clinical needs. This includes timely access to evaluations, diagnostic assessments, therapeutic interventions, and medications as appropriate. 2. Informed Consent: Patients have the right to receive information about their diagnosis, treatment options, potential risks and benefits of proposed interventions, and alternatives. Informed consent allows patients to make voluntary and educated decisions about their care. 3. Quality of Care: Patients have the right to receive care that meets established standards of quality and is provided with competence and diligence by qualified healthcare professionals. This includes adherence to evidence-based practices and guidelines. 4. Privacy and Confidentiality: Patients have the right to privacy regarding their medical and mental health information. Healthcare providers are obligated to maintain confidentiality and secure patient records, disclosing information only with the patient's consent or as required by law. 5. Dignity and Respect: Patients have the right to be treated with dignity, respect, and sensitivity to cultural, religious, and personal beliefs. Healthcare settings should promote a supportive and non-discriminatory environment. 6. Continuity of Care: Patients have the right to continuity of care, which includes ongoing treatment, follow-up appointments, and coordination of services across different healthcare providers and settings. This ensures seamless transitions and comprehensive management of health needs. 7. Complaint and Grievance Procedures: Patients have the right to voice concerns, file complaints, and seek resolution of grievances related to their care without fear of retaliation. Healthcare facilities should have established procedures for addressing patient complaints and feedback. 8. Legal Protections: Patients have legal protections that may include the right to refuse treatment, except in certain circumstances where treatment is mandated for their safety or the safety of others (e.g., involuntary commitment for psychiatric care). 9. Advance Directives and Decision-Making: Patients have the right to participate in decisions about their care, including the right to create advance directives specifying their preferences for treatment in the event they are unable to communicate their wishes. 10. Financial Considerations: Patients have the right to receive information about the costs of their care, including insurance coverage, out-of-pocket expenses, and available financial assistance or payment options. Overall, a patient's right to treatment is grounded in principles of autonomy, dignity, and access to healthcare services that promote their physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Upholding these rights requires collaboration between patients, healthcare providers, and healthcare systems to ensure compassionate and patient-centered care delivery. Chapter 16: Mental Disorder and Public Policy in Selected Countries Test Questions Part I. Multiple Choice Questions Circle the response that best answers the following questions. 1) The Mental Health Act of 1959 formally recommended an “open door” policy for mental patients in which country? A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: D 2) In __________, mental patients are to be treated in the least restrictive setting possible (community settings or at home, if possible). A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: D 3) The Social Care and Health Act of 2012 supported the “no health without mental health” policy in __________. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: D 4) __________ has abolished mental hospitals and instead placed the mentally disordered in general hospitals. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: C 5) In Great Britain, __________ treats about 95 percent of all mental patients. A) a general practitioner B) a psychologist C) a psychiatrist D) a nurse Answer: A 6) __________ is the most common mental health affliction in the United Kingdom. A) Schizophrenia B) Depression C) Panic disorders D) Substance abuse Answer: B 7) __________ was the first developed country to base its mental health care on community mental health facilities. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: C 8) __________’s history with mental illness includes an extensive eugenics program. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: B 9) The national health insurance program in __________ covers nearly all of the population’s mental health services. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: B 10) Germany’s mental health services suffer from __________. A) a poorly developed medical school system B) a disagreement about how to define mental illness C) lack of government support D) a lack of well-staffed psychiatric units Answer: D 11) Research suggests that there are higher rates of mental disorder in which of the following areas of Germany? A) the former east Germany B) western Germany C) the Munich area D) southern Germany Answer: A 12) Only a small proportion of the population of __________ has health insurance coverage of mental disorders. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: A 13) The treatment of mental disorders takes place largely in hospitals and in large cities in __________. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: A 14) Of the following countries, __________ likely has the lowest mental health burden. A) China B) Germany C) Italy D) United Kingdom Answer: A 15) Research is limited regarding mental disorder in part because of the __________. A) small numbers of practitioners B) high rates of mental disorder C) mentally ill facing social stigma D) poor funding for research Answer: C 16) China reports the highest rates of __________ in the world. A) depression B) suicide C) schizophrenia D) bipolar disorder Answer: B 17) Between 1970 and 1990, the percent of involuntary admissions to mental hospitals in Japan had __________ and the number of beds in mental hospitals had __________. A) increased; increased B) increased; decreased C) decreased; increased D) decreased; decreased Answer: C 18) In __________, more than 90 percent of the mentally ill have not sought professional help. A) Italy B) Japan C) The United States D) China Answer: D 19) While the number of beds and patients in mental hospitals declined in __________, they increased in __________. A) Great Britain; Japan B) Italy; the United States C) Japan; Italy D) the United States; Great Britain Answer: C 20) All of the following are factors accounting for the reliance on psychiatric hospitals in Japan, except __________. A) health insurance coverage B) the improved drug treatment plans C) the aging population D) the increasing national income Answer: B 21) Which of the following mental disorder is likely to dramatically increase in Japan in the near future? A) Substance abuse disorders B) Panic disorders C) Alzheimer’s disease D) Depressive disorders Answer: C 22) Japan supports a __________ system of psychiatric care. A) treatment B) custodial C) managed D) nations Answer: B 23) The majority of mental patients in Japan are hospitalized __________. A) involuntarily B) criminally C) voluntarily D) civilly Answer: B 24) In Japan, primary care for mentally ill persons falls to __________. A) the family B) nursing homes C) private care facilities D) public care facilities Answer: A 25) __________ refers to an emotional need to feel united with other people. A) Patraes B) Amae C) Sanei D) Doi Answer: B Part II. Essay Questions Answer the following questions in your own words. 1) Describe how the treatment of and policy for mental disorder differs between the United States and any one of the countries outlined. Answer: The treatment of and policies for mental disorders can vary significantly between the United States and other countries. Let's compare the United States with Canada in terms of their approaches: United States: 1. Healthcare System: In the US, healthcare is predominantly privatized, with a mix of private insurance and public programs like Medicare and Medicaid. Mental health coverage varies widely depending on insurance plans. 2. Policy and Legislation: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 requires insurers to provide equal coverage for mental health and substance use disorders as for medical and surgical care. However, enforcement and access to services can be uneven. 3. Treatment Focus: Treatment often includes a combination of psychotherapy and medication, depending on the severity of the disorder. There's a strong emphasis on evidence-based practices, though access can be limited in rural or underserved areas. Canada: 1. Healthcare System: Canada has a publicly funded healthcare system (Medicare) that provides universal coverage for medically necessary services, including mental health care. However, there can be variations in coverage between provinces. 2. Policy and Legislation: Canada has the Canada Health Act, which outlines the conditions and criteria that provinces must meet to receive federal funding for healthcare. Mental health is considered an essential part of healthcare, and efforts are made to integrate mental health services with primary care. 3. Treatment Focus: Similar to the US, treatment involves psychotherapy, medication, or a combination of both. There's also a growing emphasis on community-based care and early intervention programs. Key Differences: • Funding and Access: While both countries recognize the importance of mental health, Canada's single-payer system generally provides more consistent and broader access to mental health services compared to the US, where access can be influenced by insurance coverage and out-of-pocket costs. • Integration with Healthcare: Canada tends to integrate mental health services more closely with primary care, potentially leading to more coordinated and accessible care for patients. • Policy Emphasis: The US has a strong focus on parity in insurance coverage for mental health, whereas Canada emphasizes universal access through its publicly funded system. In summary, while both the US and Canada prioritize mental health treatment, their differing healthcare systems and policy approaches lead to variations in access, coverage, and integration of services. 2) Which country’s approach do you like best? Explain your answer. Answer: I can analyze and discuss the merits of different approaches to mental health care based on principles of effectiveness, equity, and accessibility. United States Approach: • Strengths: • Innovation and Research: The US healthcare system fosters innovation in mental health treatments and therapies. Research institutions and private sector investments drive advancements in psychiatric medications, psychotherapies, and neuroscientific interventions. • Focus on Evidence-Based Practices: There is a strong emphasis on evidence-based treatments, which helps ensure that interventions are supported by rigorous research and clinical trials. • Mental Health Parity: Legislation like the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act aims to ensure that mental health services are covered to the same extent as physical health services by insurers. Challenges: • Fragmented Healthcare System: The privatized nature of healthcare in the US can lead to disparities in access and quality of mental health care based on insurance coverage and financial resources. • Affordability: Out-of-pocket costs for mental health services, even with insurance coverage, can be prohibitive for many individuals. • Stigma and Access Barriers: Stigma surrounding mental illness and disparities in access to care (especially in rural or underserved areas) remain significant challenges. Canada Approach: • Strengths: • Universal Healthcare: Canada's publicly funded healthcare system provides universal access to medically necessary services, including mental health care. This reduces financial barriers and ensures more equitable access across the population. • Integration with Primary Care: Mental health services are often integrated with primary care settings, promoting better coordination and continuity of care. • Focus on Prevention and Early Intervention: There is a growing emphasis on community-based programs and early intervention, which can help prevent mental health issues from escalating. Challenges: • Resource Allocation: While Canada provides universal coverage, resource constraints and varying provincial policies can lead to disparities in access and wait times for specialized mental health services. • Service Delivery in Rural Areas: Access to mental health services can be challenging in remote or rural areas, where healthcare infrastructure may be limited. Considerations: • Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. The US system encourages innovation and offers a variety of treatment options, but struggles with accessibility and affordability. Canada's universal healthcare system ensures more equitable access and integration with primary care but faces challenges in resource allocation and service delivery. • Ultimately, the "best" approach would ideally combine the strengths of both systems: fostering innovation and evidence-based practices while ensuring universal access, integration with primary care, and addressing disparities in access and quality of care. Policymakers in both countries continue to explore ways to improve mental health care delivery, aiming for more effective, equitable, and accessible services for all individuals. 3) Based on your reading of this chapter, what suggestion would you have for policy makers in the United States? Answer: Based on the comparison and analysis of mental health care approaches between the United States and Canada, as well as the challenges faced by the US system, here are some suggestions for policymakers in the United States to consider: 1. Expand Access to Mental Health Services: • Address Insurance Disparities: Continue to enforce and strengthen the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act to ensure that mental health services are covered to the same extent as physical health services by all insurers. • Promote Universal Coverage: Explore options to expand access to mental health care for uninsured and underinsured populations, possibly through subsidies, Medicaid expansion, or public options. • Telehealth Expansion: Permanently expand telehealth options for mental health services to improve access, especially in rural or underserved areas. 2. Integration and Coordination of Care: • Strengthen Integration with Primary Care: Encourage and incentivize integration of mental health services into primary care settings to improve coordination and early intervention. • Community-Based Care: Invest in community mental health centers and programs that provide comprehensive care, including prevention, early intervention, and ongoing support. 3. Investment in Mental Health Workforce: • Address Shortages: Take steps to address shortages in mental health professionals, particularly psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers, through incentives for training, loan forgiveness programs, and telehealth initiatives. • Expand Scope of Practice: Consider expanding the scope of practice for licensed counselors and therapists to improve access to care. 4. Focus on Prevention and Education: • Promote Mental Health Literacy: Implement education programs in schools and communities to promote mental health literacy, reduce stigma, and encourage early recognition of mental health issues. • Early Intervention Programs: Invest in evidence-based early intervention programs for youth and adolescents, as early intervention can significantly improve long-term outcomes. 5. Research and Innovation: • Support Research Initiatives: Increase funding for research on mental health treatments, interventions, and outcomes to foster innovation and evidence-based practices. • Technology and Data Integration: Promote the use of technology and data analytics to improve mental health care delivery, outcomes measurement, and population health management. 6. Address Social Determinants of Health: • Address Root Causes: Recognize and address social determinants of mental health, such as poverty, housing instability, and discrimination, through coordinated efforts with other sectors like housing, employment, and education. 7. Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: • Monitor and Evaluate: Establish mechanisms to monitor the effectiveness of mental health policies and programs, with a focus on continuous improvement and adaptation based on outcomes data and stakeholder feedback. By implementing these suggestions, policymakers in the United States can work towards creating a more effective, equitable, and accessible mental health care system that meets the diverse needs of individuals across the country. These steps aim to reduce barriers to care, improve outcomes, and promote overall mental well-being in the population. 4) Design a policy for mental health treatment in the United States. Answer: Policy Proposal: Enhancing Mental Health Care Access and Integration Act Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to improve access to mental health treatment, enhance integration of mental health services with primary care, and promote comprehensive, evidence-based care for individuals across the United States. Key Components: 1. Expansion of Mental Health Parity and Coverage: • Enhanced Enforcement: Strengthen enforcement mechanisms of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) to ensure that insurers provide equitable coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatments. • Universal Coverage Initiative: Introduce a federal initiative to expand access to mental health care for uninsured and underinsured populations, potentially through subsidies, Medicaid expansion, or a public option. 2. Integration and Coordination of Care: • Incentives for Integration: Provide financial incentives for healthcare systems and providers to integrate mental health services into primary care settings. • Telehealth Expansion: Permanently expand telehealth options for mental health services, including reimbursement parity with in-person visits, to improve access in rural and underserved areas. 3. Workforce Development and Support: • Address Workforce Shortages: Establish grants and loan forgiveness programs to incentivize mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and counselors, to work in underserved communities. • Scope of Practice Expansion: Evaluate and potentially expand the scope of practice for licensed counselors and therapists to allow them to provide more comprehensive mental health services. 4. Prevention and Early Intervention Programs: • School-Based Initiatives: Implement mental health education and awareness programs in schools to promote early recognition of mental health issues and reduce stigma. • Community-Based Services: Invest in community mental health centers and early intervention programs that provide accessible and culturally competent care. 5. Research and Innovation Support: • Research Funding: Increase federal funding for research on mental health treatments, interventions, and outcomes, with a focus on innovative approaches and disparities in care. • Technology Integration: Promote the use of technology, data analytics, and digital health tools to improve mental health care delivery, monitoring of outcomes, and population health management. 6. Social Determinants of Health: • Interagency Collaboration: Establish collaborative efforts with other sectors such as housing, employment, and criminal justice to address social determinants of mental health and improve overall community well-being. 7. Evaluation and Accountability: • Outcome-Based Measures: Implement measures to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of mental health policies and programs, with a commitment to transparency and continuous improvement based on outcomes data and stakeholder feedback. Implementation Strategy: • Legislative Action: Introduce the Enhancing Mental Health Care Access and Integration Act in Congress, collaborating with bipartisan support and stakeholder input to ensure comprehensive coverage and support. • Partnership with States and Localities: Work with states and local communities to tailor implementation strategies based on regional needs and resources. • Public Engagement: Engage with advocacy groups, healthcare providers, mental health professionals, and affected individuals to ensure the policy meets diverse needs and promotes equitable access to mental health care. Impact Goals: • Improved Access: Reduce disparities in access to mental health care services across demographic and geographic lines. • Enhanced Integration: Increase integration of mental health services into primary care settings to improve coordination and continuity of care. • Better Outcomes: Foster improved mental health outcomes through early intervention, evidence-based practices, and holistic approaches to care. By implementing this comprehensive policy framework, the United States can make significant strides towards creating a more equitable, accessible, and effective mental health care system that meets the needs of all individuals and communities. 5) Compare and contrast any two countries’ approaches to the treatment of and policy for mental disorder. Answer: Let's compare and contrast the approaches to the treatment of and policy for mental disorders in the United States and the United Kingdom: United States: Treatment Approach: 1. Healthcare System: The US has a predominantly privatized healthcare system with a mix of private insurance and public programs like Medicare and Medicaid. Mental health coverage varies widely depending on insurance plans. 2. Policy and Legislation: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 mandates equal coverage for mental health and substance use disorders as for medical and surgical care. However, implementation and access can vary. 3. Treatment Focus: Treatment often includes a combination of psychotherapy and medication, with a strong emphasis on evidence-based practices. Access to services can be limited, particularly in rural or underserved areas, despite efforts to integrate mental health into primary care. United Kingdom (specifically England): Treatment Approach: 1. Healthcare System: The UK has a publicly funded National Health Service (NHS), providing universal healthcare coverage, including mental health services. This system is funded through general taxation and provides free care at the point of use. 2. Policy and Legislation: The NHS Long Term Plan emphasizes mental health as a priority, aiming to expand access and integrate mental health services with primary care. The Mental Health Act governs compulsory treatment and detention criteria. 3. Treatment Focus: Treatment includes a range of services from primary care psychological therapies (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) to specialized community and inpatient services. There is a strong emphasis on community-based care, early intervention, and recovery-oriented approaches. Comparison: 1. Healthcare System: • US: Privatized system with varied access based on insurance coverage and affordability. • UK: Publicly funded NHS provides universal access, reducing financial barriers to mental health care. 2. Policy and Legislation: • US: Mental Health Parity Act aims for equal coverage but faces challenges in enforcement and access. • UK: NHS Long Term Plan and Mental Health Act provide comprehensive guidelines for care provision and rights of individuals with mental illness. 3. Treatment Focus: • US: Emphasis on evidence-based treatments, but disparities in access persist. • UK: Strong focus on community-based care, early intervention, and integrating mental health into primary care, promoting holistic support. Contrast: 1. Access and Affordability: • The US system's reliance on private insurance can lead to disparities in access and affordability, whereas the NHS in the UK provides more equitable access through its universal coverage. 2. Integration and Continuity of Care: • The UK's NHS facilitates better integration of mental health services with primary care, promoting holistic and coordinated care pathways compared to the more fragmented approach in the US. 3. Policy Emphasis: • The US focuses on achieving parity in insurance coverage but struggles with implementation, whereas the UK prioritizes comprehensive service delivery and community-based support as part of its national health strategy. In summary, while both the US and the UK prioritize mental health care, their approaches differ significantly due to their healthcare systems, funding mechanisms, policy frameworks, and emphasis on integration and accessibility. The UK's NHS model provides a more centralized and integrated approach, aiming for universal access and continuity of care, whereas the US system's diversity in insurance coverage results in varied access and challenges in achieving parity in mental health care provision. Test Bank for Sociology of Mental Disorder William C. Cockerham 9780205960927

Document Details

Related Documents

Close

Send listing report

highlight_off

You already reported this listing

The report is private and won't be shared with the owner

rotate_right
Close
rotate_right
Close

Send Message

image
Close

My favorites

image
Close

Application Form

image
Notifications visibility rotate_right Clear all Close close
image
image
arrow_left
arrow_right