Chapter 3: Building Relationships Part I: Multiple Choice Questions Learning Objective 3.1: How many people are single? 1. Based on the opening vignette, we could assume that Jono and Meghan: A. are two of the 4 million people who have never married. B. are one of the nearly 7 million cohabiting households. C. are examples of involuntary stable singles. D. are divorced rather than unmarried. E. are a same-sex married couple. Answer: B Rationale: The opening vignette introduces a cohabiting couple, and there are nearly 7 million cohabiting households. 2. About ______________ people in the U.S. never marry, and this number has ______________ over the past several decades. A. 1 million; increased B. 22 million, decreased C. 10 million, decreased D. 35 million; increased E. 4 million; remained stable Answer: E Rationale: About 4 million people never marry and this figure has remained stable. 3. What is confusing about the term “single”? A. It ignores the biological causes of singleness. B. It means the same thing as “never-married.” C. It includes cohabiting couples who don’t see themselves as single. D. The Census Bureau no longer uses the term single. E. The Census Bureau only records the number of single women, but no single men. Answer: C Rationale: Cohabiting couples are single, but they don’t fit the social meaning of the term. Learning Objective 3.2: What does it mean to be “single?” 4. A Catholic priest who is not allowed to marry is an example of a(n): A. propinquity single. B. voluntary stable single. C. involuntary temporary single. D. involuntary stable single. E. pool of eligibles single. Answer: B Rationale: Voluntary stable singles want to be single, and want to be so for life. 5. Clara, at age 47, decided to adopt a child on her own because she tired of waiting around for “Mr. Right” to come along. She decided to move on with her life. Clara is an example of a(n): A. propinquity single. B. voluntary stable single. C. involuntary temporary single. D. involuntary stable single. E. pool of eligibles single. Answer: D Rationale: Involuntary stable singles “give up” and resign themselves to a single life, moving forward with their personal goals. 6. In a study of 1,000 college students, the researchers found that college students: A. most often claimed that single people were kind, caring, giving, happy, and loving. B. were equally positive toward married people and single people. C. assigned more negative traits to singles than to married people. D. believed that married people are most likely to be lonely and unhappy. E. believed that White singles were happy and loving, but Black singles were lonely and unhappy. Answer: C Rationale: In the first round of comments, singles were rated positively, but in the second round, the students offered more negative comments. Learning Objective 3.3: Why is friendship important in our lives? 7. Which of the following is FALSE regarding friendship? A. The health benefits of friendships are greater for men than for women. B. Friendships help you live longer. C. Friendships are associated with lower blood pressure, heart rates, and cholesterol levels. D. Friendships may help with the benefits of chemotherapy for cancer. E. Friendships enhance our self-esteem. Answer: A Rationale: Women have stronger, more supportive friendship networks and may fare better. Learning Objective 3.4: How do friendships differ by sex, race, ethnicity, or social class? 8. With respect to sex differences in friendship, the research shows that: A. female adolescents reported knowing their friends longer than did males. B. males and females have about the same number of friends, but men’s friendships appear less personal or intimate than women’s. C. females consider friendship more important than do males. D. males tend to disclose more personal information with their friends than do females. E. female friends spend a greater amount of time on activities as compared to males. Answer: B Rationale: Answer options A, C, D, and E are transposed; only B is correct. 9. Alex and Tony are two working-class high school friends who live in the same neighbourhood. Which of the following is likely to characterize their friendship, as compared to middle-class friendships? A. Their friendship has lasted longer. B. Their friendship is weaker. C. There are no significant differences in friendship across social classes. D. They are more likely to continue their friendship over the phone or through messages. E. They are less intimate. Answer: A Rationale: Friendships among the working class tend to last longer, be stronger, more intimate, and more in-person. Learning Objective 3.5: Can men and women ever really be “just friends?” 10. A friendship between a man and a woman that is strictly platonic is called a: A. propinquity. B. homogamous friendship. C. calling. D. cross-sex friendship. E. mixed-gender friendship. Answer: D Rationale: This is the definition provided in the text. The other answer categories have different meanings. 11. Eiko met her roommate’s brother Haruo, and they became good friends. Their relationship is strictly platonic. This is an example of a: A. propinquity. B. homogamous friendship. C. cross-sex friendship. D. mixed-gender friendship. E. spurious relationship. Answer: C Rationale: Friendships between males and females are called cross-sex friendships. 12: Cross-sex friendships: A. have been common throughout history. B. are always easy to maintain. C. never work out well. D. are less common than in your parents’ generation. E. can provide valuable insights into how the other sex thinks, feels, and behaves. Answer: E Rationale: Cross-sex friendships have been rare throughout history, are not always easy, can work out well, and are more common than in the past. Learning Objective 3.6: How have the purpose and structure of dating changed over time? 13. Dating serves many functions. Which is not one of them? A. provides fun and recreation B. offers companionship C. allows intimacy D. removes social status E. assists in mate selection Answer: D Rationale: Dating confers social status; it doesn’t remove it. 14. In colonial America, a young man may have come over to a young woman’s house for a visit under the watchful eye of her family. This pattern was referred to as: A. calling. B. the principle of least interest. C. dating scripts. D. selection effect. E. a spurious relationship. Answer: A Rationale: This is the definition provided in the text. The other answer categories have different meanings. 15. The emergence of dating began in the 19th and early 20th century, and was related to several social changes. Which is NOT one of them? A. Urbanization provided jobs, disposable income, and places to socialize. B. Women got the vote, which increased their political power. C. Automobiles provided transportation and a place for intimacy. D. A new period of time between childhood and adulthood was recognized— adolescence. E. The focus shifted from the family to the peer group. Answer: B Rationale: Women’s getting the vote (at age 21) is irrelevant to dating. All others are mentioned in the text. 16. One of the biggest changes in dating today relative to the past is: A. Dating is associated less with mate selection, is more informal, and is often done in groups. B. The principle of least interest is in effect. C. Propinquity is no longer an issue. D. Calling is more common than dating. E. The most common way that people now meet is online. Answer: A Rationale: Dating today is often called hanging out, or getting together. It is more informal than in the past. Learning Objective 3.7: How have macro-level factors shaped our micro-level choices with respect to dating? 17. Many macro-level factors have shaped our micro-level choices or dating patterns today. Which is NOT one of these macro-level factors? A. homogamy B. social class C. increased coeducational opportunities for women in school and sports D. increased equality between men and women E. the increase in technology Answer: A Rationale: Homogamy refers to a relationship with people similar to us. It is not a macro- level factor shaping micro-level choices. 18. Dating scripts: A. refer to the group from which we are likely to choose our mates. B. are the same for men and women today. C. are a set of expectations about dating. D. exist for women but not for men. E. are rarely followed by Whites, as compared to minority groups. Answer: C Rationale: Dating scripts are a set of expectations around dating, and scripts are somewhat different for men and women. 19. Patrick and Meg have been together for three years, and last month got engaged. Patrick gave Meg a beautiful diamond engagement ring. Meg did not give Patrick one. This reflects: A. that Meg is a cheapskate. B. propinquity. C. a selection effect. D. a spurious relationship. E. gendered dating scripts. Answer: E Rationale: Dating scripts remain gendered. 20. How do our social class, race, ethnicity, sex, and sexual orientation influence our micro-level choices with respect to dating? A. Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans have gendered scripts, but Whites and Asian Americans do not. B. The middle class in particular controls dating opportunities to maintain their distinctive place in society. C. Hispanic parents throw their sons and daughters a quinceañera to show that they have become adults and can now date. D. LGBTs have a more difficult time meeting others because of social stigma. E. Social class, race, ethnicity, sex, and sexual orientation do not really influence our micro-level choices with respect to dating. Answer: D Rationale: All answers are false except that LGBTs have a more difficult time meeting others because of stigma. Learning Objective 3.8: What are some contemporary trends in dating? 21. The percentage of 12th graders who say that they “never date” changed from ______________ percent to ______________ percent between 1991 and 2008. A. 5; 10 B. 10; 5 C. 18; 8 D. 22; 11 E. 12; 28 Answer: E Rationale: The direction of the trend and the specific numbers are correct. 22. Romantic relationships tend to be ______________ ; in other words, we spend most of our time with people who look like us, act like us, and think like us. A. selective B. homogamous C. at the macro-level D. spurious E. cohabiting Answer: B Rationale: This is the definition provided in the text. The other answer categories have different meanings. 23. The reason that relationships are usually homogamous is that people tend to become involved with others who live in their neighbourhoods or go to the same schools or work nearby. This concept of geographical closeness is referred to as: A. geographic state. B. open boundaries. C. geographic script. D. propinquity. E. territorial effect. Answer: D Rationale: Propinquity is correct; all other terms are made up. 24. Dee is a college-educated, upper-middle class, 45-year-old Black woman who would like a homogamous relationship with a man. Yet because of social and cultural factors, her ______________ is somewhat limited. A. pool of eligibles B. eligible bachelor set C. spurious dating pool D. open boundaries E. geographic script Answer: A Rationale: Pool of eligibles is correct; all other terms are made up. 25. With respect to online dating: A. this is now the way that most people meet. B. among those who have tried it, most did not like it. C. about half of adults know at least one person who has dated someone they met online. D. people who participate in online dating services tend to be female, White, urban, young, and to have higher levels of income and education. E. people who participate in online dating strongly believe it is the easiest and most efficient method of dating. Answer: C Rationale: Only C is a correct statement; the others are false. Learning Objective 3.9: How common is cohabitation? 26. How common is cohabitation? A. About 5 percent of all couples are cohabiting, which is more than triple that in 2000. B. About 10 percent of all couples are cohabiting, which is almost double that in 2000. C. No one really knows how common cohabitation is because it is impossible to gather reliable statistics. D. More people are cohabiting than are married. E. About 25 percent of all couples are cohabiting, which is about the same as in 2000. Answer: B Rationale: Nearly 7 million households are maintained by cohabiting couples, which is about 10 percent of all couples and double the number in 2000. 27. Compared to people who are married, cohabitors: A. have more education and are significantly more likely to have graduated from college. B. earn more money on average. C. are about the same age. D. are much less likely to have children residing with them. E. are nearly twice as likely to be interracial, particularly with one Black and one White partner. Answer: E Rationale: Only E is true, the others are false. Learning Objective 3.10: How have attitudes regarding cohabitation changed over time? 28. Which statement best describes the attitudes toward cohabitation? A. Attitudes toward cohabitation have become more accepting among men but not women over the last few decades. B. Most high school seniors think cohabitation is a good idea, whereas 30 years ago most did not. C. Most adults think cohabitation is an acceptable option. D. Most adults see cohabitation as a good thing for society. E. Blacks are most likely to think cohabitation is a good thing for society. Answer: B Rationale: Senior males and females are now likely to see cohabitation as a good idea, although most adults still do not feel that way. 29. Demographer Judith Seltzer notes several important demographic trends that indicate that the meaning of cohabitation is changing. Which is one of these? A. Cohabiting unions are more likely to be a prelude to marriage now than they were in past decades. B. Cohabiting couples are more likely to be parents than they were in the past. C. Single women who become pregnant are more likely to cohabit today than to marry the child’s father. D. The number of people who cohabit has declined since 2005. E. Women are more likely to enjoy cohabitation than are men. Answer: B Rationale: One or both may have a child from a previous union or the couple may have a child together. Learning Objective 3.11: How does cohabitation affect marriage? 30. People who cohabit are more likely to divorce. Some people suggest that this is because the type of person who cohabits may be the same type of person who would willingly end an unhappy marriage. This is called a: A. selection effect. B. random event. C. cohabitation effect. D. spurious relationship. E. negative outcome performance. Answer: A Rationale: Selection effect is correct; all other terms are made up. 31. Nick wants to know if the relationship between cohabitation and divorce is only spurious, or does cohabitation really cause divorce? A. the relationship is only spurious B. cohabitation really causes divorce C. neither is likely true D. both are likely true but the selection effect is probably stronger e ) there is no empirical way to know the answer to this question Answer: D Rationale: It is likely that both are operating to some degree, but selection effects seem to receive the most support. Learning Objective 3.12: What are the effects of cohabitation on children? 32. About ______________ percent of cohabiting couples have children living with them. A. 5 B. 10 C. 20 D. 40 E. 55 Answer: D Rationale: About 4 in 10 cohabiting couples have children under the age of 18 residing in the home, born to one or both partners. 33. What are the effects of cohabitation on children? A. The effects of cohabitation on children are virtually always negative. B. The effects of cohabitation on children are virtually always positive. C. Children who live with their mother and her unmarried partner have poorer school performance and exhibit more behavioral problems than do children who live solely with a single mother, with a mother and stepfather, or with two biological parents. D. Children who live with their mother and her unmarried partner face higher risk for poverty, food insecurity, and housing insecurity, compared to children living with a single mother. E. Cohabiting families, as compared to married families, spend a greater amount of money on their children’s education. Answer: C Rationale: Whether cohabitation is good or bad for children largely depends on what alternatives exist, but generally children receive most support and do best when they are reared in households with two married biological parents. Learning Objective 3.13: What are some differences and similarities between homosexual and heterosexual couples? 34. In 1996 the U.S. Congress passed a federal law, the ______________ , which had two main goals: (1) to define marriage as a “legal union of one man and one woman as husband and wife”; and (2) to allow each state to deny constitutional marital rights between persons of the same sex that have been recognized in another state. A. Constitutional Marriage Provision B. Domestic Partner Law C. Defending Marriage Partnership Act (DMPA) D. Heterosexual Marriage Mandate (HMM) E. Defense of Marriage Act Answer: E Rationale: Answer E is correct; the other answers are wrong. 35. Your next door neighbours are two gay men who have been cohabiting for several years. Given your understanding of the research on gay couples, which of the following statements is probably FALSE? A. Gay couples are significantly different from lesbian couples with respect to relationship quality, social support, and the likelihood of dissolution. B. Your gay neighbours are similar to about half of other gay men who are also in committed relationships. C. They are more comfortable with closeness compared to their married counterparts and more open with their partner. D. They are similar to other heterosexual couples in most ways, and any differences are likely very small. E. They receive less support from family and friends than do heterosexual couples. Answer: A Rationale: Gay and lesbian couples are not significantly different with respect to the listed characteristics. Part II: True – False Questions 1. In the opening vignette, Jono and Meghan are a newly married couple. Answer: False 2. There is little difference between “single” and “never married” among young people, but that is not the case for older people. Answer: True 3. Max is an unmarried adult delaying marriage while pursuing education and establishing a career, known as a voluntary temporary single. Answer: True 4. Voluntary stable singles are singles actively searching for a mate but unable to find a suitable one. Answer: False 5. Involuntary temporary singles are unmarried adults desiring a single (unmarried) lifestyle. Answer: False 6. Men and women have about the same number of friends, but men’s friendships appear less personal or intimate than women’s. Answer: True 7. Members of the middle class tend to have friendships that are longer- lasting than are those of the working class. Answer: False 8. A friendship between a man and a woman that is strictly platonic is known as a cross- sex friendship. Answer: True 9. Leslie and Joseph are great friends and are strictly platonic. This is an example of a cross-sex friendship. Answer: True 10. “Dating” is the mechanism used around the world for finding a mate. Answer: False 11. In colonial America, a date was referred to as “calling,” and sometimes lasted for several days. Answer: True 12. Industrialization and urbanization brought young people together and made dating possible. Answer: True 13. The period of life that occurs between childhood and adulthood is adolescence. Answer: True 14. The principle of least interest refers to the concept that females are more romantic than males. Answer: False 15. One of the biggest changes in dating over the past generation is that it is becoming more distinct from mate selection. Answer: True 16. Attitudes about relationships have become less traditional and more egalitarian, therefore dating scripts are no longer gendered. Answer: False 17. Maria’s parents are planning her quinceañera, which is a coming-out party for young Hispanic women to indicate that they are now eligible to date. Answer: True 18. Today’s twelfth-grade students are more likely to date than they were in 1991. Answer: False 19. Jack and Emma are about the same age, have the same racial and ethnic background, are both from middle-class families, and are both about to graduate from college. We would say that their relationship is homogamous. Answer: True 20. Ernesto and Gloria, two high school seniors who are in love, live only a few blocks away from one another. This geographical closeness is also known as propinquity. Answer: True 21. About 5 percent of marriages are between people of a different race or ethnicity. Answer: False 22. The group from which we are likely to choose our mates is known as a pool of eligibles. Answer: True 23. An arrangement in which two people live together without being married is known as a calling. Answer: False 24. Today, nearly 1 million U.S. households are maintained by heterosexual cohabiting couples. Answer: False 25. Men, Blacks, people with some college, and those who are not religious are more likely to have cohabited. Answer: True 26. Today most adults believe that cohabitation is a good thing for society. Answer: False 27. People who cohabit with their partner before marriage are less likely to divorce. Answer: False 28. Selection effect is when a relationship between two variables is actually caused by a third variable. Answer: False 29. The research is clear: cohabitation is always bad for children. Answer: False 30. If we compare same-sex cohabiting to heterosexual relationships, we find that they are more alike than different. Answer: True Part III: Short Answer/Fill in the Blank Questions: 1. Meghan and Jono, in the opening vignette, are an example of what type of single? Answer: voluntary temporary single 2. List the four types of singles, according to the typology developed by Stein. Answer: (1) voluntary temporary singles; (2) voluntary stable singles; (3) involuntary temporary singles; (4) involuntary stable singles. 3. List three specific examples from the text that illustrate the importance of friendship for health and well-being. Answer: Friendships support us, help us build communities, enhance our self- esteem, teach us about ourselves and others, and can help us live longer. Friendships have been shown to lower blood pressure, heart rates, and cholesterol levels, and lead to lower levels of a particular protein linked to more aggressive cancers and that inhibits the effectiveness of chemotherapy. 4. List three features of men’s friendships, compared to women’s. Answer: Men have the same number but less intimate friendships; less verbal disclosure and spend more time engaging in activities; expect less closeness, intimacy, and commitment; males know their friends for a longer period. 5. List three social class differences in friendship. Answer: Members of the working and lower classes tend to have friendships that are longer- lasting than are those of the middle class; the longevity of lower-class friendships allowed more opportunity to become intimate and share much about themselves; they also are less tied to technology. 6. What is the term used to describe platonic friendships between men and women? Answer: cross-sex friendships 7. List the five functions of dating. Answer: provides fun and recreation; offers companionship; allows intimacy; confers social status; assists in mate selection 8. Why did women have such little power in colonial American “calling”? Answer: Women had to sit and wait to be called upon, and hope for the best. Since there were so few opportunities for women outside of marriage and motherhood, they knew that they desperately needed to marry. 9. A set of expectations about how to behave on a date is called a ______________ . Answer: dating script 10. Josefina attended a coming-out party for her Hispanic friend who just turned 15. It was an elaborate celebration of her womanhood, which is called a/an ______________ . Answer: quinceañera 11. What are the dating patterns of twelfth-graders today compared with 1991? Answer: Twelfth-grade students are less likely to date than they were in 1991; 12 percent and 28 percent, respectively. 12. Since we spend most of our time with people who look like us, act like us, and think like us, our relationships tend to be ______________ . Answer: homogamous 13. List the two reasons that most relationships are homogamous? Answer: (1) propinquity and (2) parents may exert pressure on children to marry “their own kind.” 14. Cohabitation is defined as: Answer: Living with a romantic and sexual partner without being married. 15. List three characteristics of cohabitors, compared to those who have not cohabited. Answer: male, Black, some college, not very religious, White protestant 16. How do adults in general feel about cohabitation: is it a good thing for society, a bad thing, or does it not make much difference? Answer: Adults are equally split over whether cohabitation is a bad thing or makes no difference for society. Only 10 percent believe it is a good thing. 17. What do we mean by a selection effect with respect to cohabitation and divorce? Answer: The type of person who cohabits may be the same type of person who would willingly end an unhappy marriage. 18. What do we mean when we say that the relationship between cohabitation and divorce is spurious? Answer: Both cohabitation and divorce are really caused by a third factor. 19. List two reasons why children in two-parent biological families on average experience better academic, psychological, and social outcomes. Answer: Children in two-parent families tend to have greater family incomes, experience fewer transitions in their lives, and have more involvement with their fathers. 20. List the two main goals of the Defense of Marriage Act. Answer: (1) To define marriage as a “legal union of one man and one woman as husband and wife.” (2) To allow each state to deny constitutional marital rights between persons of the same sex that have been recognized in another state. 21. Dr, Kurdek’s research compares same-sex and heterosexual relationships. How alike or different are they? Answer: mostly alike Part IV: Essay Questions: 1. There are many different types of singles. List the typology by Stein, and provide an example of each type. Answer: In her typology of singles, Bella DePaulo identifies several categories that capture the diversity of single individuals: 1. Temporary Singles: • Example: A recent college graduate who is single while focusing on establishing their career and adjusting to post-grad life. 2. Contented Singles: • Example: An individual who has chosen to remain single and finds fulfilment in their independence, hobbies, and social networks. 3. Seeking Singles: • Example: Someone actively looking for a romantic partner, using dating apps, attending social events, and engaging in matchmaking activities. 4. Distracted Singles: • Example: A person who is temporarily single due to focusing intensely on personal goals, hobbies, or career advancement. 5. Preoccupied Singles: • Example: An individual who desires a romantic relationship but finds themselves preoccupied with other life responsibilities or personal issues. 6. Wary Singles: • Example: Someone who is cautious about entering into a romantic relationship due to past negative experiences or fears of commitment. 7. Resigned Singles: • Example: An individual who has reluctantly accepted their single status, perhaps after multiple unsuccessful relationships or life circumstances. 8. Temporary Doubting Singles: • Example: A person who is experiencing temporary doubts about their current relationship status, unsure whether they want to remain single or pursue a relationship. 2. Why is friendship so important in our lives? What does the research reveal? Answer: Friendship plays a crucial role in our lives for several reasons, supported by extensive research in psychology and sociology: 1. Emotional Support: Friends provide companionship and emotional support during times of joy and hardship. Having close friends to share experiences with can reduce feelings of loneliness and increase overall well-being. 2. Social Connection: Friendships contribute to our sense of belonging and social identity. They provide opportunities for social interaction, group activities, and shared experiences that enrich our lives. 3. Health Benefits: Research indicates that strong social connections, including friendships, are associated with better physical and mental health outcomes. Friends can provide encouragement for healthy behaviours, offer stress relief, and buffer against negative health effects of stress. 4. Psychological Development: Friendships play a significant role in personal growth and development. They offer opportunities for self-disclosure, feedback, and learning from others' perspectives, fostering emotional maturity and empathy. 5. Quality of Life: Having close friendships enhances overall quality of life by increasing happiness, satisfaction with life, and resilience in the face of challenges. 3. Explain sex differences in friendship. What might account for these differences? Answer: Sex differences in friendship refer to observed variations in how men and women typically form and maintain friendships, influenced by social norms, communication styles, and psychological factors: 1. Friendship Styles: • Men: Men often engage in activity-based friendships focused on shared interests or activities. Their friendships tend to be less intimate and cantered around group dynamics or common hobbies. • Women: Women tend to prioritize emotionally supportive and intimate friendships characterized by sharing personal experiences, feelings, and thoughts. Their friendships often involve deeper emotional bonds and conversations. 2. Communication Patterns: • Men: Men typically communicate in a more direct and instrumental manner, focusing on problem-solving and shared activities rather than emotional expression. • Women: Women often engage in more indirect and expressive communication, emphasizing empathy, validation, and emotional connection in their friendships. 3. Socialization and Norms: • Social Expectations: Cultural and societal norms influence how men and women are socialized to form friendships. Men may face pressure to prioritize self-sufficiency and independence, while women are encouraged to cultivate close interpersonal relationships. • Gender Roles: Traditional gender roles can shape friendship patterns, with men encouraged to demonstrate toughness and stoicism, which may affect their willingness to engage in emotionally intimate friendships. 4. Evolutionary Perspectives: • Evolutionary theories suggest that sex differences in friendship styles may reflect ancestral roles in hunter-gatherer societies, where men focused on group cohesion and task-oriented activities, while women nurtured social bonds within smaller, intimate groups. 5. Contextual Factors: • Friendship dynamics can vary based on cultural background, individual personality traits, and life experiences. Contextual factors such as workplace environments, educational settings, and family dynamics also influence friendship formation and maintenance. Understanding these sex differences in friendship can help promote healthier social interactions and support systems for both men and women, acknowledging the diverse ways individuals form meaningful connections throughout their lives. 4. Write an essay about cross-sex friendships. Can men and women be “just friends?” Answer: Cross-sex friendships, defined as platonic relationships between individuals of opposite sexes, have been a topic of interest and debate in social psychology and popular culture. The question of whether men and women can be "just friends" without romantic or sexual attraction complicating the relationship has garnered various perspectives and research findings. Historical and Cultural Context: Historically, societal norms and expectations have often viewed cross-sex friendships through a lens of suspicion or romantic potential. Traditional gender roles and stereotypes have suggested that men and women naturally gravitate towards romantic involvement rather than purely platonic friendships. However, contemporary views and research challenge these assumptions. Research and Perspectives: 1. Psychological Research: Psychological studies indicate that cross-sex friendships are indeed possible and can thrive without romantic or sexual undertones. Factors such as mutual respect, shared interests, and emotional support contribute to the development and maintenance of these friendships. 2. Communication and Boundaries: Effective communication and clear boundaries are crucial in maintaining platonic cross-sex friendships. Open discussions about expectations, feelings, and potential romantic interests can help clarify the nature of the relationship and mitigate misunderstandings. 3. Individual Differences: Personal characteristics, such as attachment styles, relationship history, and cultural background, influence individuals' ability to engage in cross-sex friendships. Some people may find it easier to maintain platonic relationships regardless of gender, while others may struggle with blurred boundaries or romantic feelings. 4. Social Context: Cultural shifts towards gender equality and diverse relationship dynamics have contributed to more acceptance and normalization of cross-sex friendships. In modern societies, people are increasingly recognizing the value of platonic friendships based on mutual respect and emotional support. Challenges and Considerations: While platonic cross-sex friendships are feasible and beneficial, challenges can arise, particularly if one party develops romantic feelings or if external pressures (e.g., societal expectations, jealousy from partners) complicate the relationship. Navigating these challenges requires clear communication, respect for boundaries, and mutual understanding. Conclusion: In conclusion, men and women can indeed be "just friends" in meaningful and fulfilling platonic relationships. Psychological research and evolving social norms support the idea that cross-sex friendships can thrive based on mutual respect, shared interests, and effective communication. While challenges may arise, the key lies in establishing clear boundaries and understanding each other's perspectives and intentions. Ultimately, the potential for platonic cross-sex friendships underscores the diversity and complexity of human relationships beyond romantic or sexual dynamics. 5. Describe contemporary dating patterns, and explain how these may be different from the past. Answer: Contemporary dating patterns reflect evolving societal norms, technological advancements, and changing attitudes towards relationships compared to the past. Historical Context: In the past, dating often followed traditional scripts and rituals governed by social norms and expectations. Courtship rituals, parental involvement, and a focus on marriage as the primary goal characterized dating patterns in earlier eras. Contemporary Dating Patterns: 1. Casual Dating and Hookup Culture: In contemporary times, casual dating and hookup culture have become more prevalent, especially among younger generations. Dating apps and online platforms facilitate meeting new people and exploring casual relationships without immediate commitment. 2. Delaying Marriage: Compared to previous generations, there is a trend towards delaying marriage and focusing on personal and career development. Individuals are marrying later in life, prioritizing educational and professional goals before settling down. 3. Diverse Relationship Models: Contemporary dating embraces diverse relationship models beyond traditional heterosexual monogamy. LGBTQ+ individuals have more visibility and acceptance, leading to a greater diversity of relationship dynamics and structures. 4. Technology and Dating Apps: The advent of dating apps and social media has transformed how people meet and interact. Online dating platforms offer a wide pool of potential partners, matching algorithms, and instant communication, reshaping the dating landscape. 5. Informal and Non-Traditional Relationships: Non-exclusive relationships, open marriages, and polyamory are increasingly accepted and practiced, challenging conventional notions of dating and commitment. Factors Influencing Change: • Gender Roles and Equality: Evolving gender roles and increased gender equality have shifted power dynamics and expectations within relationships. • Technological Advancements: Dating apps and social media provide new avenues for meeting people and navigating relationships. • Changing Social Norms: Attitudes towards sex, marriage, and relationships have become more liberal and inclusive, allowing for greater diversity in dating patterns. Conclusion: Contemporary dating patterns reflect a shift towards flexibility, diversity, and personal autonomy compared to traditional dating practices. The influence of technology, changing social norms, and evolving attitudes towards relationships has broadened the spectrum of dating experiences and possibilities in modern society. 6. List the micro-level and macro-level factors associated with dating. Answer: Dating behaviours are influenced by various micro-level (individual) and macro-level (societal) factors: Micro-level Factors: 1. Personal Preferences: Individual preferences, such as attraction to specific traits or personality characteristics, guide dating choices. 2. Personal History: Relationship history, experiences, and attachment styles shape individuals' approach to dating and relationships. 3. Values and Beliefs: Personal values, cultural background, and religious beliefs influence expectations and behaviours in dating. Macro-level Factors: 1. Social Norms and Expectations: Cultural norms and societal expectations regarding gender roles, marriage, and dating influence individuals' dating behaviours. 2. Technological Influence: Advances in technology, such as dating apps and social media, provide new ways to meet potential partners and influence dating behaviours. 3. Economic Factors: Socioeconomic status and financial considerations can impact dating opportunities and choices. 4. Legal and Institutional Factors: Laws and policies related to marriage, divorce, and family structure shape dating practices and relationship dynamics. 7. Compare and contrast the frequency of cohabitation with the attitudes toward it. Answer: Cohabitation, defined as living together in a romantic relationship without being married, has become increasingly common in many societies. However, attitudes towards cohabitation vary widely across cultures and demographic groups. Frequency of Cohabitation: 1. Increasing Rates: Cohabitation has become more prevalent in recent decades, particularly among younger adults. Many couples choose to cohabit as a precursor to marriage or as an alternative to marriage. 2. Demographic Trends: Cohabitation rates vary by age, education level, and socioeconomic status. Younger adults and individuals with higher education levels are more likely to cohabit before or instead of marriage. Attitudes Toward Cohabitation: 1. Changing Attitudes: Overall, attitudes towards cohabitation have become more accepting and favourable compared to the past. Many view cohabitation as a practical step in a committed relationship or a way to test compatibility before marriage. 2. Generational Differences: Older generations may hold more conservative views towards cohabitation, viewing it as unconventional or morally questionable. Younger generations tend to have more liberal attitudes and see cohabitation as a natural progression in relationships. Comparison: • Frequency vs. Attitudes: While cohabitation rates have risen, especially among younger adults, attitudes have also shifted towards greater acceptance and normalization of cohabiting relationships. Contrast: • Variability in Attitudes: Despite increasing frequency, attitudes towards cohabitation can vary significantly across cultural, religious, and regional contexts. Some societies maintain conservative views that emphasize marriage as the ideal relationship structure. Conclusion: Cohabitation is a complex social phenomenon influenced by both demographic trends and cultural attitudes. While its frequency has increased in modern times, attitudes towards cohabitation continue to evolve, reflecting broader shifts in societal values and norms regarding relationships and family dynamics. 8. Describe the relationship between cohabitation and marriage. What may explain the relationship? Answer: Cohabitation and marriage are interconnected relationship stages that have evolved in response to changing social norms, economic factors, and individual preferences. Relationship Dynamics: 1. Prevalence as a Precursor to Marriage: Many couples view cohabitation as a transitional stage before marriage, allowing them to test compatibility, shared living arrangements, and financial partnership. 2. Alternative to Marriage: In some cases, couples choose to cohabit as an alternative to formal marriage due to personal beliefs, legal considerations, or financial reasons. Factors Explaining the Relationship: 1. Changing Social Norms: Evolving attitudes towards relationships and family structures have reduced the stigma associated with cohabitation, making it a viable option for couples before or instead of marriage. 2. Economic Considerations: Financial factors, such as the cost of weddings, housing affordability, and career stability, influence couples' decisions to cohabit rather than marry. 3. Legal and Social Benefits: Legal frameworks and social benefits associated with marriage, such as tax incentives, healthcare coverage, and inheritance rights, may incentivize couples to formalize their relationship through marriage. 4. Individual Preferences: Personal beliefs about commitment, autonomy, and relationship goals shape whether couples choose cohabitation, marriage, or both as relationship milestones. 5. Cultural and Religious Influences: Cultural traditions and religious beliefs impact attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage, with some societies emphasizing marriage as a sacred union and others embracing diverse relationship structures. Conclusion: The relationship between cohabitation and marriage reflects societal shifts towards greater flexibility in relationship choices and structures. Couples navigate these stages based on personal, economic, and cultural factors, highlighting the diverse paths individuals take in forming and maintaining committed partnerships. 9. Write an essay describing the effects of cohabitation on children, and the possible reasons for these effects. Answer: Cohabitation, defined as unmarried couples living together in a romantic relationship, has become increasingly common in many societies. The effects of cohabitation on children have been a topic of interest and research, exploring how this living arrangement impacts child development and well-being. Effects of Cohabitation on Children: 1. Family Instability: Cohabiting relationships are generally less stable than marriages, leading to higher rates of relationship dissolution. Children in cohabiting families may experience more transitions and changes in household composition, which can disrupt their sense of stability and security. 2. Parental Relationship Quality: Research suggests that relationship quality between cohabiting parents can influence child outcomes. Higher levels of conflict or instability in the parental relationship may contribute to stress and emotional difficulties for children. 3. Educational Attainment: Children in cohabiting families may have lower educational attainment compared to children in married families. Factors such as economic instability and lower parental education levels in cohabiting households can impact children's academic performance and opportunities. 4. Emotional and Behavioral Issues: Some studies indicate that children in cohabiting families may be at a higher risk for emotional and behavioral problems, including anxiety, depression, and externalizing behaviours. These issues may stem from family conflict, inconsistent parenting practices, or lack of parental commitment. 5. Health and Well-being: Cohabiting families may face challenges in accessing healthcare and social services compared to married families, potentially impacting children's physical health and overall well-being. Possible Reasons for These Effects: 1. Economic Factors: Cohabiting families often have lower household incomes and fewer financial resources compared to married families. Economic instability can contribute to stress and strain within the family, affecting parental relationships and children's development. 2. Parental Relationship Dynamics: Cohabiting relationships may differ from marriages in terms of commitment, communication, and conflict resolution strategies. Relationship instability or lack of formal commitment may affect parenting practices and family dynamics. 3. Social and Legal Context: Societal attitudes towards cohabitation, legal protections, and social support systems can influence family functioning and children's outcomes. Lack of legal recognition and societal stigma may impact parental and child well-being. 4. Parental Characteristics: Individual characteristics of cohabiting parents, such as education levels, age at childbirth, and relationship history, can influence parenting behaviours, household dynamics, and children's outcomes. 5. Cultural and Normative Influences: Cultural beliefs about marriage, family structure, and parental roles shape attitudes towards cohabitation and may impact family functioning and child development outcomes. Conclusion: While cohabitation offers couples flexibility and companionship, it presents unique challenges for children's development compared to stable married relationships. Understanding the effects of cohabitation on children requires consideration of economic, social, parental, and cultural factors that shape family dynamics and child well-being. Further research is needed to explore how different contexts and interventions can support positive outcomes for children in cohabiting families. 10. Compare and contrast same-sex and heterosexual relationships. What are the differences and similarities? Answer: Same-sex and heterosexual relationships share similarities in terms of emotional connection and relationship dynamics, but they also exhibit differences influenced by social norms, legal recognition, and unique challenges faced by each type of relationship. Differences: 1. Legal Recognition: Same-sex relationships have historically faced legal barriers to recognition and rights compared to heterosexual marriages. Legalization of same-sex marriage in many countries has granted equal legal rights, but challenges may still exist in some regions. 2. Social Acceptance: Same-sex relationships may face stigma and discrimination based on sexual orientation. Heterosexual relationships generally benefit from societal norms and expectations that support their legitimacy and visibility. 3. Parenting and Family Formation: Same-sex couples may face additional challenges in family formation, including legal barriers to adoption or assisted reproductive technologies. Heterosexual couples typically face fewer legal obstacles in forming families through biological or adoptive means. 4. Community and Support Networks: Same-sex relationships often involve navigating LGBTQ+ communities and support networks that provide understanding and resources. Heterosexual relationships may draw support from broader social networks and family structures. 5. Gender Dynamics: Heterosexual relationships typically conform to traditional gender roles, while same-sex relationships may challenge or redefine gender norms and expectations within the relationship. Similarities: 1. Emotional Intimacy: Both same-sex and heterosexual relationships involve emotional connection, mutual support, and companionship as fundamental aspects of partnership. 2. Communication and Conflict Resolution: Effective communication and conflict resolution are essential for both types of relationships to thrive and maintain harmony. 3. Commitment and Stability: Commitment to the relationship and relationship stability are valued in both same-sex and heterosexual partnerships, contributing to relationship satisfaction and longevity. 4. Relationship Satisfaction: Factors such as trust, respect, shared values, and common interests contribute to relationship satisfaction in both same-sex and heterosexual relationships. 5. Relationship Challenges: Both types of relationships face challenges related to communication, parenting, finances, and external stressors that impact relationship dynamics and longevity. Conclusion: Same-sex and heterosexual relationships exhibit both similarities and differences influenced by legal recognition, social acceptance, parenting challenges, and gender dynamics. Understanding these dynamics contributes to fostering inclusive policies, supportive environments, and respectful relationships for all couples, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. Continued societal progress towards equality and acceptance can enhance the well-being and stability of both types of relationships. Test Bank for Exploring Marriages and Families Karen T. Seccombe 9780205915194, 9780134708201, 9780133807776
Download
Close
Close
