This Document Contains Chapters 13 to 15 Chapter Thirteen Test Questions What Did We Eat? SAMPLE QUESTIONS Multiple Choice 1) "Zooarchaeology" is defined as the study of __________. A. plant remains found in the archaeological record B. animal remains found in the archaeological record C. human coprolites D. pollen remains found in the archaeological record Answer: B 2) A "life assemblage" is defined as __________. A. the number of organic remains in a fossil deposit B. the community of live animals in their natural proportions C. the number of animals that die of natural causes D. the part of a fossil assemblage that is actually excavated Answer: B 3) Taphonomy may be defined as the study of __________. A. animal bones from archaeological sites B. human coprolites C. the processes that operate on an organism after it dies D. organic remains from archaeological sites Answer: C 4) Archaeological faunal remains usually consist of __________. A. whole skeletons B. bone fragments C. partial skeletons D. whole animals Answer: B 5) The goal of zooarchaeology is to reconstruct __________. A. animal ecology B. plant macrofossils C. stone tools D. past environments and human behavior Answer: B 6) The number of identified specimens (NISP) is __________. A. the count of the number of individuals necessary to account for all the identifiable bones B. the count of the number of bones or bone fragments from each species in a bone sample C. the count of the number of species in an assemblage D. the count of the number of bones from domesticated animals Answer: B 7) The minimum number of individuals (MNI) is __________. A. the count of the number of individuals necessary to account for all the identifiable bones B. the count of the number of bones or bone fragments from each species in a bone sample C. the count of the number of bones in an assemblage D. the count of bones from domesticated animals Answer: A 8) Through the study of faunal assemblages at Klasies River cave and Nelson's Bay cave, Richard Klein was able to demonstrate __________. A. changes in the way people exploited other animals over time B. the effects of climate change on animals C. the effects of climate change on people D. how Magdalenian tools developed in response to the Ice Age Answer: A 9) Most long-term shifts in animal species abundance during the Ice Age were due to __________. A. human subsistence practices B. climatic shifts C. predator-prey relationships D. large mammals Answer: B 10) Which of the following may explain why some prey species are favored by hunters and some are ignored? A. taboos and seasonal activities B. non-seasonal occupation C. ritual hunting activities D. overall taste Answer: A 11) Seasonal occupation of archaeological sites may be inferred from __________. A. growth patterns in animal bones and animal tooth eruptions B. animal tooth wear patterns C. deer antlers fuzz removal D. mud layers that compose the site Answer: A 12) Domestication of wild animals seems to occur when __________. A. they become sociable B. a growing human population needs a more regular food supply C. they become useful to people D. they become unfit for survival in the wild Answer: B 13) At the Garnsey site, John Speth was able to determine that the hunters __________. A. took equal numbers of male and female bison throughout the year B. had a strong preference for juvenile female bison C. had a strong preference for male bison during the spring hunting season D. did not kill bison, but only scavenged them Answer: C 14) The Olsen-Chubbock kill site yielded evidence of __________. A. an attritional age profile B. a slaughtered bison herd C. domesticated animals D. surplus male horses Answer: B 15) Wild vegetable foods were a staple of the ancient world from the earliest times __________. A. up to the moment when people first began to cultivate the soil some 12,000 years ago B. up to the moment when people began to hunt animals for food C. up until the processing of mollusks replaced plant foods D. up until the planting and cultivation of crops, fruits, nuts, and berries Answer: A 16) Seeds, fruits, grasses, and leaves do not survive long unless they are __________. A. carbonized, or preserved under very wet or extremely arid conditions B. complete and unfragmented C. modern-day crops D. kept in tightly sealed jars Answer: A 17) Flotation is a technique used to recover __________. A. pottery B. large mammal bones C. plant remains D. stone tools Answer: C 18) Knowledge about the ecology of both animals and plants is essential for the __________. A. scheduling of resource exploitation B. domestication of both plants and animals C. cultivation of both plants and animals D. storage of food resources Answer: A 19) The Tehuacan Valley provides a record of the domestication of __________. A. rice B. cows C. sheep D. maize Answer: D 20) The decline in pickleweed in the Hogup Cave sequence has been attributed to __________. A. changing food preferences B. a difference in preservation conditions in the cave C. a rise in nearby Great Salt Lake D. a loss of technology to process pickleweed Answer: C 21) Palynology may be described as the analysis of __________ from archaeological sites. A. stone tools B. pottery C. pollen D. animal bones Answer: C 22) In many hunter-gatherer societies, gathering generally provides __________. A. a substantial portion of the diet B. a very minor dietary component C. the entire portion of the diet D. no portion of the diet Answer: A 23) Archaeological evidence from Abu Hureyra documents __________. A. the origins of hunting B. the origins of food production C. the extinction of many species of Pleistocene mammals D. the domestication of corn Answer: B 24) Hildegard Howard investigated seasonality at the Emeryville mound using __________. A. bird bones B. mammal age profiles C. plant phytoliths D. pollen remains Answer: A 25) One the whole, bird bones have been __________. A. neglected in archaeology B. completely ignored in archaeology C. over-studied in archaeology D. missing from the archaeological record Answer: A 26) In general, mollusks have served as __________. A. a source of raw material for tools, but not as food B. food for women and children, but not men C. a staple food D. a dietary supplement Answer: D 27) Many of the species of fish depicted on Mimbres pottery came from __________. A. the local area B. the Gulf of California, over 450 miles away C. the Gulf of Mexico, over 450 miles away D. the Zambezi Valley Answer: B 28) Isotopic analyses of prehistoric bone and hair __________. A. can help to establish the diet of an organism B. can help determine how plants were domesticated C. have been proven ineffective in diet reconstruction D. have yet to be tried Answer: A 29) One method for reconstructing prehistoric diets is __________. A. stone tool analysis B. coprolite analysis C. metallurgy D. sediment study Answer: B 30) Isotopic analysis of human skeletal material has been used by archeologists to establish __________. A. relative proportions of C-3 to C-4 plants in the diet B. age at death C. the effects of diseases such as rickets D. the sex of an individual Answer: A 31) Coprolites are very useful in the study of ancient __________. A. settlement patterns B. trading networks C. smelting technology D. diet Answer: D 32) Pearsall and Piperno have argued for the presence of early maize in coastal Ecuador based on __________. A. written records B. depictions on pottery vessels C. phytoliths D. maize cobs Answer: C 33) Pollen diagrams from Easter Island suggest that __________. A. wine palms became more common over time B. wine palms were never common on the island C. the island was deforested through burning and cutting of wine palms D. wine palms were never important in the subsistence practices of the island's inhabitants Answer: c 34) Fish remains from the Talepop site in southern California indicate that the Chumash Indians __________. A. fished only in estuaries B. fished only in lakes C. practiced both surf fishing and canoe fishing in estuaries D. fished only in the deep sea Answer: C 35) Mollusk remains from La Batiquitos Lagoon in San Diego show that __________. A. the lagoon silted up over time B. there was no change in mollusks over time C. mollusk preferences changed over time due to different cultural groups moving into the area D. mollusks were rarely eaten Answer: A Short Answer 36) List four sources of data for prehistoric subsistence. Explain each one. Answer: 1. Faunal Remains: Analysis of animal bones and remains found at archaeological sites provides insights into the diet, hunting practices, and domestication of animals by prehistoric societies. 2. Botanical Remains: Examination of plant remains, seeds, and pollen preserved in archaeological contexts reveals information about cultivated crops, wild plants gathered for food, and environmental conditions. 3. Isotopic Analysis: Studying stable isotopes (e.g., carbon, nitrogen) in human and animal bones provides dietary information, indicating the types of foods consumed and ecological relationships. 4. Microwear Analysis: Microscopic examination of tool edges to identify wear patterns, residues, and use-wear traces helps reconstruct activities such as hunting, processing food, or crafting tools in prehistoric societies. 37) Briefly discuss one technique that archaeologists use to determine seasonality. Cite a specific example. Answer: • Technique: Oxygen isotope analysis of mammalian tooth enamel. • Explanation: By analyzing the ratio of oxygen isotopes (e.g., δ18O) preserved in tooth enamel, archaeologists can infer seasonal variations in water sources consumed by animals. This provides clues about the time of year animals were hunted or gathered, helping to determine seasonal patterns of subsistence activities. • Example: In the study of early human sites like Grotta del Romito in Italy, oxygen isotope analysis of fossilized herbivore teeth indicated fluctuations in water availability and seasonal movements of prey species, aiding in the reconstruction of hunting strategies and subsistence practices. 38) Describe one method of flotation recovery. Answer: • Method: Water flotation. • Description: Archaeologists use water flotation to recover small botanical remains and artifacts such as seeds, charcoal fragments, and tiny bones from sediment samples collected at archaeological sites. The process involves agitating sediment in water to separate lighter organic materials (floatation) from heavier sediments (residue), which are then collected through fine mesh sieves. The recovered materials are examined under a microscope to identify plant species, determine diet, and reconstruct environmental conditions and human activities. 39) Describe one instance in which palynology has been a valuable tool for reconstruction of the past. Answer: • Instance: The study of ancient agricultural practices in Mesopotamia. • Explanation: Palynological analysis of sediment cores from archaeological sites like Tell Leilan in northern Mesopotamia revealed shifts in pollen assemblages corresponding to changes in land use and agricultural practices over millennia. By identifying pollen types associated with cultivated crops such as wheat, barley, and legumes, palynologists reconstructed the development of irrigation systems, crop rotations, and land management strategies in early urban centers. This provided crucial insights into the environmental impact of ancient civilizations, patterns of agricultural intensification, and socio-economic changes during the Bronze Age in Mesopotamia. 40) Define "taphonomy." Answer: • Taphonomy: Taphonomy is the study of the processes that affect organic remains after death and their preservation in the archaeological record. It encompasses the study of how organisms become fossilized or preserved as archaeological remains, including factors such as decay, burial, and post-depositional alterations. 41) Differentiate between diet and nutrition. Answer: • Diet: Diet refers to the types and quantities of food consumed by an individual or a group. It focuses on the selection and ingestion of foods, including preferences for certain plant or animal species, cooking methods, and cultural practices related to food consumption. • Nutrition: Nutrition refers to the physiological effects of the diet on an organism's health and well-being. It considers the absorption, metabolism, and utilization of nutrients from food sources, influencing growth, development, and overall health outcomes. Essay 42) Discuss three factors affecting the numbers of species in a faunal assemblage. Which would be the hardest to demonstrate prehistorically? Answer: Faunal assemblages in archaeology reflect complex interactions between human activities, environmental conditions, and ecological factors. Three key factors influencing the composition of faunal assemblages include: 1. Habitat Diversity: • Definition: The variety of habitats available in the local environment, including forests, grasslands, wetlands, and coastal areas. • Impact: Greater habitat diversity supports a wider range of animal species with diverse ecological niches and dietary preferences. • Prehistoric Difficulty: Demonstrating habitat diversity prehistorically relies on indirect evidence such as sediment analyses, pollen records, and faunal remains themselves, making it challenging to reconstruct specific habitat configurations without direct observational data. 2. Human Hunting Practices: • Definition: The methods, intensities, and seasonal variations in human exploitation of animal resources for subsistence. • Impact: Intensive hunting of specific prey species can lead to local extinctions or declines in population sizes, altering faunal assemblages over time. • Prehistoric Difficulty: Determining past hunting practices requires robust faunal analyses, isotopic studies, and archaeological contexts to differentiate between natural mortality and anthropogenic impacts on faunal populations. 3. Climate Change: • Definition: Long-term shifts in temperature, precipitation patterns, and environmental stability influencing animal distributions and population dynamics. • Impact: Climate fluctuations can lead to habitat fragmentation, migrations, and adaptive responses by animal species, affecting their representation in faunal assemblages. • Prehistoric Difficulty: Reconstructing past climates relies on proxy data from ice cores, sediment records, and stable isotopic analyses, which may not always provide direct correlations to faunal compositions without comprehensive multi-proxy studies. Which would be the hardest to demonstrate prehistorically? • Habitat diversity would likely be the hardest to demonstrate prehistorically. Unlike human hunting practices and climate change, which leave indirect traces in archaeological and environmental records, proving the exact configuration and diversity of habitats in ancient landscapes requires a combination of ecological modeling, sediment analysis, and interpretation of faunal remains in context. 43) How do sex, age, and slaughter patterns relate to one another in the study of archaeological faunal assemblages? Answer: Sex, age, and slaughter patterns are critical factors studied in archaeological faunal assemblages to understand human subsistence strategies, social organization, and cultural practices: • Sex: Analysis of skeletal traits and size dimorphism in faunal remains helps determine the sex composition of hunted or domesticated animals. Sexual preferences in hunting or selective breeding for specific traits may indicate cultural preferences or economic priorities. • Age: Estimating the age-at-death of faunal specimens through dental wear, bone fusion, and growth marks provides insights into hunting strategies, seasonal exploitation, and management of breeding populations. Different age classes reflect varying contributions to human diets and economic activities. • Slaughter Patterns: Examination of cut marks, bone fractures, and processing techniques on faunal remains reveals patterns of butchery, meat consumption, and utilization of animal resources. Variations in carcass treatment may indicate ritual practices, social divisions, or specialized economic roles within prehistoric societies. Relationships: • Sex and Age: Understanding the sex and age structure of faunal assemblages helps reconstruct demographic profiles of hunted or domesticated animals, indicating selective hunting practices, breeding strategies, and economic decisions related to meat, hides, or secondary products. • Age and Slaughter Patterns: Correlating age profiles with butchery marks and processing techniques elucidates seasonal hunting patterns, dietary preferences, and resource management strategies. Attritional age profiles suggest long-term exploitation, while catastrophic profiles may indicate mass hunting events or ritual practices. • Sex and Slaughter Patterns: Differential treatment of male and female animals in butchery practices may reflect gendered roles in hunting or symbolic associations with fertility and social status. Sex ratios in faunal assemblages provide insights into gender-based labor divisions and cultural perceptions of animal use. In summary, integrating sex, age, and slaughter patterns enhances interpretations of human-animal interactions, subsistence strategies, and socio-cultural behaviors in archaeological contexts, revealing nuanced insights into past lifeways and environmental adaptations. 44) Discuss the difference between a catastrophic age profile and an attritional age profile. How are they used to investigate human behavior? Answer: Archaeological faunal assemblages provide valuable insights into past human behaviors through the analysis of age profiles, distinguishing between catastrophic and attritional mortality patterns: • Catastrophic Age Profile: • Definition: A catastrophic age profile shows an unusual concentration of young or old individuals compared to what would be expected under normal mortality conditions. • Characteristics: It typically indicates sudden, mass mortality events such as hunting drives, natural disasters, or ritual slaughters. • Investigative Use: Archaeologists use catastrophic age profiles to infer communal hunting strategies, ritual practices (e.g., sacrifices), or responses to environmental catastrophes impacting prey populations. For example, an assemblage with a high proportion of juvenile animals might suggest seasonal hunting drives targeting young, vulnerable prey species. • Attritional Age Profile: • Definition: An attritional age profile represents a more balanced distribution across age categories, resembling natural mortality patterns observed in wild populations. • Characteristics: It reflects gradual, ongoing accumulation of faunal remains over time due to natural deaths, hunting by small groups, or sustained use of resources. • Investigative Use: Archaeologists interpret attritional age profiles to reconstruct subsistence strategies, demographic patterns, and hunting practices of past societies. For instance, an assemblage dominated by prime-aged adults could indicate targeted hunting of mature animals for meat or other resources essential for survival. How They Investigate Human Behavior: • Behavioral Inferences: Analysis of age profiles helps archaeologists infer hunting strategies, resource management practices, and social behaviors within past human communities. • Environmental Adaptations: Patterns in age profiles provide evidence of adaptive responses to environmental changes, seasonal resource availability, or ecological pressures influencing prey populations. • Cultural Practices: Variations in age profiles may indicate cultural preferences for specific animals or age classes, reflecting symbolic meanings, social statuses, or ritual practices associated with faunal exploitation. In summary, catastrophic and attritional age profiles offer complementary perspectives on past human interactions with animal resources, facilitating interpretations of subsistence strategies, environmental impacts, and cultural dynamics shaping archaeological faunal assemblages. 45) Discuss the importance of the Tehuacan Valley in subsistence studies. Include in your answer information on location, occupation, and seasonality. Answer: The Tehuacan Valley, located in south-central Mexico, holds significant importance in subsistence studies due to its rich archaeological record spanning several millennia: • Location: Situated between the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Sierra Madre del Sur, the Tehuacan Valley is characterized by diverse ecological zones, including semi-arid deserts, foothills, and temperate forests. • Occupation: The valley has been continuously inhabited by human populations for over 10,000 years, with evidence of multiple cultural phases and technological developments preserved in archaeological sites such as Coxcatlan Cave and Guila Naquitz Cave. • Seasonality: Archaeological research in the Tehuacan Valley has provided insights into seasonal subsistence patterns, highlighting the exploitation of diverse plant and animal resources adapted to local environmental conditions. Studies indicate intensive harvesting of agave, cactus fruits, and wild cereals during dry seasons, supplemented by hunting of deer, rabbits, and birds year-round. The Tehuacan Valley's archaeological findings contribute to understanding early human adaptations to varied habitats, shifts in subsistence strategies, and the development of agricultural practices during the transition from foraging to farming. 46) How has the development of agriculture affected human populations? How has it affected hunting and gathering practices? Describe the change from primarily hunter-gatherer societies to primarily agricultural ones. Answer: The development of agriculture has profoundly influenced human populations and altered hunting and gathering practices in several ways: • Impact on Human Populations: • Population Growth: Agriculture enabled sedentary lifestyles, surplus food production, and demographic expansions by supporting larger, more stable communities. • Social Complexity: Agricultural surpluses facilitated the rise of complex societies, specialization of labor, and centralized political structures. • Health and Nutrition: Transition to agriculture led to dietary shifts, nutritional deficiencies, and increased susceptibility to diseases due to population density and close proximity to domesticated animals. • Effect on Hunting and Gathering Practices: • Decline in Importance: As agriculture became a primary food source, reliance on hunting and gathering diminished but remained significant for protein acquisition, trade, and cultural practices. • Environmental Impact: Agricultural practices altered landscapes, deforestation, and wildlife habitats, impacting biodiversity and availability of wild resources. • Technological Advances: Agricultural societies developed tools, irrigation systems, and storage facilities, enhancing food production efficiency and economic specialization. • Transition from Hunter-Gatherer to Agricultural Societies: • Early Agriculture: Transition began around 10,000 years ago in multiple regions worldwide, characterized by experimentation with plant domestication, soil cultivation, and animal husbandry. • Cultural Adaptations: Shifts from nomadic lifestyles to settled farming communities fostered cultural innovations, social stratification, and religious beliefs tied to agricultural cycles. • Long-term Implications: Agricultural revolutions laid foundations for urbanization, trade networks, and technological advancements (e.g., pottery, metallurgy) shaping the development of civilizations. In summary, agriculture revolutionized human societies by increasing food security, promoting demographic growth, and fostering cultural transformations while influencing ecological landscapes and subsistence strategies over millennia. 47) Discuss how artifacts and fish bones help archaeologists reconstruct prehistoric fishing practices. Answer: Artifacts and fish bones provide valuable insights into prehistoric fishing practices through archaeological analysis: • Artifacts: • Fishing Gear: Tools such as fish hooks, harpoons, net weights, and fishing spears recovered from archaeological sites indicate technological advancements and fishing methods used by ancient societies. • Processing Tools: Artifacts like cutting implements, scrapers, and bone needles used for processing fish suggest specialized skills in fish preparation and preservation techniques. • Fish Bones: • Species Identification: Analysis of fish bone assemblages identifies species exploited by prehistoric populations, revealing preferences for freshwater versus marine fish, seasonal variations, and ecological adaptations. • Butchery Marks: Examination of bone surface modifications, cut marks, and fragmentation patterns provides evidence of fishing practices, fish processing methods, and utilization of different parts of fish for food, tools, or ornaments. • Reconstruction of Practices: • Site Context: Contextual analysis of artifacts and fish remains within settlement patterns, coastal sites, or inland waterways helps reconstruct fishing strategies, subsistence economies, and cultural significance of fish resources. • Chronological Changes: Comparative studies across time periods and regions elucidate technological innovations, dietary shifts, and socio-economic changes associated with fishing activities from early hunter-gatherer to complex maritime societies. By integrating artifact studies and faunal analyses, archaeologists gain comprehensive insights into prehistoric fishing practices, ecological interactions, and adaptations to aquatic environments, contributing to broader understandings of human-animal relationships and cultural developments in ancient societies. 48) Discuss how shellfish from La Jolla culture middens at La Batiquitos Lagoon in San Diego allowed archaeologists to reconstruct the prehistoric ecology of the lagoon. Answer: The study of shellfish remains from La Jolla culture middens at La Batiquitos Lagoon in San Diego provides valuable insights into the prehistoric ecology and human interactions with coastal environments: • Shellfish Species Identification: Analysis of shellfish assemblages, including oysters, clams, and mussels, identifies species exploited by prehistoric inhabitants. Shell size variations indicate changes in local environments, species availability, and human harvesting practices. • Seasonality and Resource Exploitation: Examination of shell growth patterns and size distributions reflects seasonal patterns of shellfish collection, dietary preferences, and ecological adaptations. Shifts in shellfish species composition over time suggest fluctuations in marine environments, climate impacts, and human subsistence strategies. • Environmental Reconstructions: Integration of shellfish data with sediment cores, faunal analyses, and geoarchaeological studies reconstructs paleoenvironmental changes, sea level fluctuations, and coastal ecosystem dynamics. Stable isotope analysis of shell carbonate provides insights into past marine environments, food webs, and nutrient sources supporting human populations. • Cultural Significance: Contextual studies of artifacts, hearths, and settlement patterns around middens elucidate social behaviors, ritual practices, and economic interactions tied to coastal resources. Artifacts like shell tools, beads, and ornaments highlight cultural innovations and trade networks linked to marine environments. The study of shellfish from La Jolla culture middens at La Batiquitos Lagoon exemplifies how archaeological analyses integrate ecological data, cultural practices, and environmental changes to reconstruct past human adaptations and maritime histories along coastal landscapes. 49) Is it possible to recover subsistence data from rock art? Support your position with examples. Answer: Recovering subsistence data from rock art is challenging but possible through interdisciplinary approaches and contextual studies: • Depiction of Fauna: Rock art often portrays local fauna, hunting scenes, or fish traps, providing visual representations of animal species hunted or revered by ancient societies. Examples include bighorn sheep in North American petroglyphs and fish motifs in Australian Aboriginal rock paintings. • Seasonal Depictions: Some rock art panels show seasonal activities, such as hunting migrations or fishing practices linked to ecological calendars and resource availability. Seasonal variations in animal behaviors and cultural practices are inferred from stylistic changes and motifs in rock art sequences. • Technological Insights: Rock art may depict hunting tools, fishing implements, or gathering baskets, offering insights into technological advancements, resource management strategies, and environmental knowledge embedded in visual narratives. • Cultural Context: Interpretations of rock art incorporate oral histories, ethnographic studies, and archaeological data to contextualize subsistence practices, ritual beliefs, and socio-economic interactions shaping ancient lifeways. Integrating rock art with faunal analyses, paleoenvironmental studies, and isotopic research enhances interpretations of dietary shifts, dietary breadth, and ecological resilience in prehistoric societies. While challenges exist in interpreting rock art as direct subsistence records, advancements in analytical techniques and interdisciplinary collaborations broaden understandings of ancient dietary practices, cultural landscapes, and human-environment relationships depicted in rock art worldwide. 50) What are some sources of data on prehistoric diet and nutrition? Give examples. Answer: Sources of data on prehistoric diet and nutrition encompass diverse archaeological, paleoenvironmental, and bioarchaeological evidence: • Faunal Remains: Analysis of animal bones, teeth, and shells from archaeological sites provides insights into consumed species, hunting strategies, and dietary preferences. Examples include deer bones from European Mesolithic sites and marine mollusks from coastal middens. • Plant Remains: Examination of charred seeds, pollen grains, phytoliths, and starch residues recovered from archaeological contexts identifies cultivated crops, wild plants, and subsistence shifts over time. Examples include maize cultivation in Mesoamerica and rice domestication in East Asia. • Human Skeletal Remains: Isotopic analyses of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in bone collagen and dental enamel reveal dietary protein sources, trophic levels, and geographic mobility. Examples include stable isotope studies of Neolithic populations in Europe and Paleolithic foragers in Africa. • Coprolites: Preserved human and animal fecal remains provide direct evidence of ingested foods, intestinal parasites, and dietary habits. Examples include coprolites from Ancestral Puebloan sites in North America and Neanderthal caves in Europe. • Archaeobotanical Records: Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of plant remains, including seeds, fruits, and wood charcoal, reconstructs ancient plant use, land management practices, and culinary traditions. Examples include ancient wheat grains from Near Eastern settlements and fruit pits from Roman urban contexts. • Artifacts and Features: Examination of cooking hearths, grinding stones, pottery residues, and food storage facilities elucidates food processing techniques, culinary practices, and foodways integration into cultural identities. Examples include Neolithic pottery vessels with dairy lipid residues in Europe and stone tools used for plant processing in South America. In summary, diverse data sources on prehistoric diet and nutrition contribute to reconstructing subsistence strategies, environmental adaptations, and socio-cultural dynamics shaping human dietary behaviors across global archaeological records. Integrative approaches combining multiple lines of evidence enhance interpretations of dietary diversity, nutritional health, and resilience strategies in ancient societies. Chapter Fourteen Test Questions The Living Past SAMPLE QUESTIONS Multiple Choice 1) Nineteenth century evolutionists __________. A. developed middle-range theory B. used ethnoarchaeology to interpret the archaeological record C. made direct analogies between living tribes and prehistoric cultures D. believed that it was not valid to compare living and prehistoric cultures Answer: C 2) Direct historical analogy is based on __________. A. the principle of working from the unknown to the known B. finds at the Colonial settlement on Martin's Hundred C. the principle of working from the known to the unknown D. Marxist-Leninist doctrine Answer: C 3) In modern processual archaeology, analogies __________. A. are only used in historical archaeology B. are used only to make interpretations regarding stone tools C. are rarely used D. are thought of as hypotheses to be tested Answer: D 4) Emperor Shihuangdi was the first ruler to unify __________ China into a single kingdom, a task that he completed in 221 B.C. A. northern and western B. western and eastern C. northern and southern D. western and southern Answer: C 5) The notion that cultures are not made up of random selections of traits but that cultural traits are integrated in various ways and influence each other in fairly predictable ways comes from __________. A. functionalism B. direct historical analogy C. middle-range theory D. ethnoarchaeology Answer: A 6) Ivor Noel Hume used direct historical analogy to interpret __________. A. gold and silver wire B. sandals C. Maiden Castle D. lithics Answer: A 7) Which of the following archaeologists worked at Martin's Hundred, Virginia, using direct historical analogy? A. W.J. Sollas B. Ivor Noel Hume C. Lewis Binford D. James Hill Answer: B 8) In archaeology, middle-range theory is used __________. A. just like analogy B. to bridge the gap between what actually happened in the past and the archaeological record C. to evaluate hypotheses with ecological theory D. instead of subsistence analyses Answer: B 9) Controlled, modern experiments with ancient technologies and material culture that can serve as a basis for interpreting the past is __________. A. experimental archaeology B. middle-range theory C. ethnoarchaeology D. functionalism Answer: A 10) A fundamental assumption of middle-range theory is that __________. A. living behavior is static, while the archaeological record is dynamic B. both living behavior and the archaeological record are static C. living behavior is dynamic, while the archaeological record is static D. both living behavior and the archaeological record are dynamic Answer: c 11) The study of living societies to aid in understanding and interpreting the archaeological record is known as __________. A. middle-range theory B. experimental archaeology C. ethnoarchaeology D. functionalism Answer: C 12) John Yellen's work with the !Kung San in the Kalahari focused on __________. A. !Kung camps B. !Kung marriage rituals C. !Kung hunting techniques D. !Kung pottery Answer: A 13) James O'Connell's ethnoarchaeological research on the Hadza has led archaeologists to question many of their assumptions regarding __________. A. spatial relationships of houses in hunter-gatherer camps B. Hadza symbolism C. garbage disposal D. hunter-gatherer kill sites Answer: D 14) Experimental archaeology is rife with pitfalls. What might one be? A. creating stone tools with bone and stones B. viewing the remains of animals after hyenas have scavenged them C. grinding maize on metates with an ancient mano D. replicating ancient plowing techniques by pulling the replica plow with a tractor Answer: D 15) While working near the Mexico-Guatemala border, Brian Hayden discovered __________. A. that some present-day Maya still make stone artifacts B. that present-day Maya rely on frozen food during much of the year C. that the San live in close-knit groups D. that aboriginal settlements are scattered Answer: A 16) Which of the following groups depend on meat more than any other hunter-gatherers known? A. the San B. Australian Aborigines C. the Nunamiut D. the Maya Answer: C 17) Nunamiut adaptation depends on __________. A. long-term storage strategies B. lithic technology C. growing corn D. metate manufacturing Answer: A 18) Ian Hodder's approach to archaeology focuses on __________. A. stone tool manufacturing methods B. the structure and symbols in tropical African societies C. animal processing among hunter-gatherers D. settlement patterns among the !Kung Answer: B 19) The first experiments in archaeology involved __________. A. stone tool making B. hunting caribou C. growing maize D. Scandinavian and British bronze horns Answer: D 20) The first person to replicate Folsom points was __________. A. Ishi B. Don Crabtree C. Alfred Kroeber D. Saxon Pope Answer: B 21) Thor Heyerdahl's experiment involved __________. A. sailing the Kon Tiki across the Pacific Ocean B. building pole houses C. reconstructing clay houses D. refitting lithic debitage Answer: A 22) One Danish experiment yielded estimates that a man could clear a half-acre of forest in __________. A. a day B. a week C. two weeks D. a month Answer: B 23) Lithic expert Jeff Flenniken argues that __________. A. many different Paleo-Indian "types" are simply heads of points that have been broken during use B. Paleo-Indian "points" were actually used primarily as knives C. Paleo-Indian points were used for gardening D. modern flint-knapping does not provide valuable information for interpreting PaleoIndian assemblages Answer: A 24) The Butser Hill experiment has focused on __________. A. Nunamiut hunting B. the manufacture of Folsom points C. tree-felling techniques in West Africa D. Iron Age subsistence Answer: D Short Answer 25) How did Ivor Noel Hume identify William Harewood's house at Martin's Hundred? Answer: • Ivor Noel Hume identified William Harewood's house at Martin's Hundred through a combination of historical research, archaeological excavation, and analysis of artifacts. He used documentary evidence, such as property records and maps, to pinpoint the location. Excavations revealed structural remains and artifacts characteristic of the time period and social status associated with Harewood, confirming the identification. 26) What is meant by the term "test implication"? Answer: • "Test implication" refers to the logical consequences or predictions derived from a hypothesis or theory that can be empirically tested through research or experimentation. In archaeology, hypotheses about past human behavior or cultural practices generate testable implications that researchers validate through fieldwork, data analysis, and comparative studies. 27) How does the Tucson garbage study relate to archaeology? Answer: • The Tucson garbage study, conducted by William Rathje and his team, involved analyzing modern garbage to understand contemporary consumption patterns and waste disposal practices. It relates to archaeology by applying archaeological methods (such as stratigraphy and artifact analysis) to modern material culture. This study demonstrates the longevity and preservation potential of modern trash, offering insights into future archaeologists' interpretations of contemporary societies based on their refuse. 28) What are two important conclusions of Lewis Binford's study of the Nunamiut? Answer: • Lewis Binford's study of the Nunamiut, an Inuit group in Alaska, yielded several important conclusions: 1. Subsistence Strategies: Binford documented the Nunamiut's adaptive hunting strategies, emphasizing their seasonal movements and exploitation of diverse prey species for survival. 2. Cultural Evolution: He highlighted cultural changes among the Nunamiut over time, including technological innovations in tool-making and social adaptations to environmental challenges, illustrating human resilience and innovation in Arctic conditions. 29) Who was Ishi and why is he important to archaeologists? Answer: • Ishi was the last known member of the Yahi tribe of California Native Americans. He emerged from hiding in 1911 and lived the remainder of his life in anthropological research at the University of California, Berkeley. Ishi is important to archaeologists because he provided firsthand knowledge and cultural insights into traditional Yahi lifeways, including tool-making, hunting techniques, and spiritual beliefs. His collaboration with anthropologists preserved valuable cultural knowledge and contributed to understanding California's indigenous history and archaeology. 30) What do archaeologists expect to learn from the Overton Down experiment? Answer: Archaeologists conducting the Overton Down experiment aim to learn about the long-term preservation and degradation processes of buried materials in different environmental conditions. Specifically, they investigate factors such as soil composition, moisture levels, and microbial activity that affect the integrity and survival of archaeological remains over extended periods. By simulating burial environments and monitoring the decomposition of organic and inorganic materials, researchers can refine methods for excavation, preservation, and conservation strategies. This experimental approach helps archaeologists develop more accurate models and predictions for interpreting archaeological sites and artifacts in diverse geographical and climatic contexts. Essay 31) Discuss how archaeologists use analogy in interpretation. Give examples. Answer: Archaeologists use analogy as a methodological tool to interpret past human behaviors, technologies, and cultural practices by drawing parallels with known or ethnographically documented societies. Analogical reasoning involves comparing archaeological evidence to modern or historical counterparts, assuming similar functions, behaviors, or cultural meanings. Examples of how analogy is used in interpretation include: • Technological Analogy: Comparing ancient stone tool manufacturing techniques found in archaeological sites with modern flintknapping methods used by experimental archaeologists to understand tool production sequences and skill levels. • Subsistence Analogy: Studying faunal remains and food preparation tools in ancient settlements to infer dietary practices and hunting strategies, drawing analogies with ethnographic data on contemporary hunter-gatherer societies. • Social Organization Analogy: Analyzing settlement layouts, house structures, and artifact distributions in archaeological contexts to hypothesize about social hierarchies and community dynamics, using analogies with documented ethnographic patterns of social organization. Analogical reasoning in archaeology provides heuristic frameworks for generating hypotheses, interpreting material culture, and reconstructing past lifeways, while acknowledging the inherent complexities and limitations of comparing distinct cultural contexts across time and space. 32) Discuss the three fundamental assumptions of middle-range theory, and explain how middle-range theory is used in archaeology today. Answer: Middle-range theory in archaeology bridges the gap between broad theoretical frameworks and specific empirical data, focusing on causal explanations and operational links between observable evidence and cultural processes. The three fundamental assumptions of middle-range theory are: • Regularities: Middle-range theories assume that human behaviors and cultural processes exhibit regular patterns or recurring behaviors that can be identified through empirical evidence, such as artifact distributions or settlement patterns. • Cultural Universals: Middle-range theory posits that certain cultural practices, technologies, or social behaviors may be universal or have comparable analogs across different societies, facilitating cross-cultural comparisons and generalizations. • Functional Relationships: Middle-range theories emphasize functional relationships between cultural phenomena and their social, economic, or environmental contexts, exploring how specific cultural practices or technologies serve adaptive functions within a given cultural system. In archaeology today, middle-range theory is applied in various ways: • Contextual Analysis: Archaeologists use middle-range theory to interpret archaeological data within specific cultural contexts, linking material remains with broader cultural systems and historical processes. • Experimental Archaeology: Middle-range theory guides experimental reconstructions of ancient technologies or subsistence practices to test hypotheses about cultural behaviors and technological innovations. • Ethnographic Analogy: Middle-range theory facilitates comparisons between archaeological findings and ethnographic observations of contemporary societies, aiding in the interpretation of cultural practices, ritual behaviors, and social organization. Overall, middle-range theory enhances archaeological interpretations by providing explanatory frameworks that integrate empirical data with theoretical insights, advancing understanding of cultural change, adaptation, and continuity over time. 33) How would one study the role of sandal making in the Great Basin Indians of 6000 B.P. using functionally oriented analogy? Be specific and detailed. Evaluate this approach. Answer: To study the role of sandal making among the Great Basin Indians circa 6000 B.P. using functionally oriented analogy, archaeologists can employ a structured approach focusing on technological processes, material choices, and functional adaptations: • Technological Processes: Analyze archaeological evidence of sandal fragments, tool kits, and production waste to reconstruct manufacturing techniques, including weaving, stitching, and knotting methods. Use ethnographic analogies with modern indigenous groups known for sandal making (e.g., California tribes) to infer tool types, raw material procurement strategies, and skill levels required. • Material Choices: Examine plant fibers, hide remnants, and textile impressions to identify locally available materials used in sandal construction. Compare with ethnographic records of plant species and processing techniques used in historic and contemporary sandal production among indigenous peoples in similar ecological settings. • Functional Adaptations: Evaluate wear patterns, sizing variations, and ergonomic designs of sandal artifacts to infer intended uses, seasonal adaptations, and environmental constraints faced by Great Basin populations. Draw analogies with ethnographic studies of footwear among nomadic societies to interpret sandal functionality in relation to mobility, terrain navigation, and resource exploitation strategies. Evaluation of Approach: Functionally oriented analogy offers valuable insights into ancient sandal making practices by linking archaeological data with ethnographic parallels and experimental reconstructions. Benefits include: • Hypothesis Generation: Analogical reasoning generates testable hypotheses about technological evolution, cultural transmission, and adaptive responses to environmental change among Great Basin societies. • Cross-Cultural Comparisons: Comparative analyses with ethnographic case studies broaden interpretative frameworks, highlighting cultural continuities, technological innovations, and regional variations in sandal production techniques. • Limitations: Challenges include potential biases in analogical reasoning, cultural discontinuities over millennia, and interpretative ambiguities arising from differential preservation of organic materials and incomplete archaeological records. In conclusion, functionally oriented analogy enriches archaeological interpretations of sandal making in the Great Basin circa 6000 B.P. by integrating empirical data with theoretical frameworks, advancing knowledge of ancient material culture, and cultural resilience in dynamic environments. 34) Describe Lee and Yellen's study of the !Kung San. How was it important to archaeology? Answer: Richard B. Lee and Richard H. Yellen conducted a seminal ethnographic study of the !Kung San (also known as Ju/'hoansi), a group of hunter-gatherers in the Kalahari Desert of southern Africa. Their study, spanning several decades from the late 1960s onward, focused on documenting !Kung social organization, subsistence strategies, technological practices, and cultural adaptations to arid environments. Key aspects of their research included: • Subsistence Practices: Lee and Yellen detailed the !Kung San's hunting and gathering techniques, including tracking, trapping, and plant foraging. They documented seasonal variations in resource exploitation and food-sharing customs within !Kung communities. • Technological Innovations: The study highlighted !Kung tool-making traditions, such as stone tool knapping and bone tool crafting, illustrating adaptive strategies for exploiting diverse ecological niches and optimizing resource extraction. • Social Organization: Ethnographic observations elucidated !Kung kinship systems, communal decision-making processes, and egalitarian social norms, challenging stereotypes of primitive societies and contributing to debates on human evolutionary adaptations. Importance to Archaeology: Lee and Yellen's ethnographic study of the !Kung San has been pivotal to archaeology in several ways: • Ethnographic Analogy: Their findings provided analogies for interpreting archaeological evidence of ancient hunter-gatherer societies, informing reconstructions of prehistoric lifeways, subsistence economies, and social structures. • Methodological Advances: The longitudinal approach and participant observation methods pioneered by Lee and Yellen set standards for rigorous ethnographic research in anthropology and archaeology, emphasizing holistic understandings of cultural dynamics and environmental interactions. • Theoretical Contributions: Their work influenced middle-range theory in archaeology by linking ethnographic data with archaeological interpretations, advancing interdisciplinary approaches to cultural continuity, technological change, and adaptive strategies among prehistoric populations. In summary, Lee and Yellen's ethnographic study of the !Kung San provided foundational insights into human behavioral ecology, cultural diversity, and adaptive resilience in arid landscapes, shaping archaeological interpretations of hunter-gatherer societies worldwide. 35) Discuss the importance of the Maya lithic study undertaken by Brian Hayden. Answer: Brian Hayden's lithic study of the Maya civilization in Mesoamerica was instrumental in understanding technological innovations, economic organization, and social complexities of ancient Maya societies. Key aspects of Hayden's research included: • Technological Analysis: Hayden examined lithic assemblages, including chipped stone tools, cores, and debitage recovered from Maya archaeological sites. He identified manufacturing techniques, tool typologies, and raw material procurement strategies, shedding light on specialized craft production and trade networks. • Economic Organization: The study revealed lithic workshops, production centers, and distribution patterns within Maya urban centers and hinterlands. Hayden documented craft specialization, surplus production, and socioeconomic disparities linked to elite control over lithic resources and labor forces. • Social Complexity: Ethnographic analogies and comparative studies highlighted the role of lithic technologies in Maya ritual practices, status symbols, and ideological frameworks. Hayden explored the symbolic meanings of obsidian mirrors, ceremonial blades, and ritual caches as expressions of political power and religious authority. Importance to Archaeology: Hayden's Maya lithic study contributed significantly to archaeology: • Cultural Evolution: The analysis of lithic technologies provided chronological markers for dating Maya archaeological sequences, refining chronologies and periodizations of cultural phases and historical developments. • Urbanism and Craft Production: Hayden's research underscored the role of lithic workshops in urban economies, resource management strategies, and urban-rural interactions, illuminating urbanization processes and economic resilience in ancient Maya city-states. • Interdisciplinary Insights: The integration of lithic studies with iconographic analysis, epigraphy, and settlement archaeology enhanced interpretations of Maya material culture, religious ideologies, and sociopolitical transformations over time. In summary, Brian Hayden's Maya lithic study advanced archaeological knowledge of ancient Mesoamerican civilizations, emphasizing technological innovations, economic complexities, and cultural dynamics shaping Maya urbanism and societal development. 36) Discuss an example of experimental archaeology. Why was that experiment performed? What were the results? Answer: An exemplary case of experimental archaeology is the reconstruction of prehistoric pottery firing techniques conducted by archaeologist Pamela Vandiver. This experiment aimed to replicate ancient pottery production methods and analyze firing technologies used by Neolithic societies in Europe. Key aspects of Vandiver's experiment included: • Experimental Design: Vandiver recreated pottery vessels using locally sourced clay and replicated traditional forming techniques observed in archaeological contexts. She constructed kilns based on archaeological evidence and ethnographic analogies to simulate firing conditions. • Research Objectives: The experiment sought to determine optimal firing temperatures, atmospheric conditions, and clay mineral transformations during the pottery firing process. Vandiver hypothesized that variations in firing techniques influenced vessel durability, thermal properties, and aesthetic qualities of ancient ceramics. • Results and Findings: Vandiver's experimental findings demonstrated that Neolithic potters employed controlled firing regimes to achieve desired vessel properties, including hardness, thermal shock resistance, and color variations. She identified distinct firing phases (oxidation, reduction) impacting clay mineralogy and surface finishes, corroborating archaeological interpretations of ceramic typologies and regional stylistic variations. Significance: Vandiver's experimental approach contributed to archaeological interpretations by: • Validation of Hypotheses: The experimental data validated hypotheses about prehistoric pottery production techniques, technological innovations, and cultural adaptations to local clay resources and environmental conditions. • Technological Insights: The study provided insights into firing technology evolution, kiln design innovations, and adaptive strategies employed by ancient potters to optimize ceramic durability and functional performance. • Methodological Advances: Vandiver's experimental protocols established benchmarks for replicating ancient craft traditions, integrating ethnographic data with material science analyses, and refining chronologies of pottery traditions across different archaeological periods and cultural regions. In conclusion, experimental archaeology, exemplified by Vandiver's pottery firing experiments, enhances archaeological interpretations by testing hypotheses, reconstructing ancient technologies, and elucidating cultural behaviors shaping material culture evolution. 37) Define ethnoarchaeology and illustrate with an example. Answer: Ethnoarchaeology is an interdisciplinary approach that studies modern human societies, particularly traditional or indigenous groups, to understand past archaeological behaviors, material culture, and cultural practices. Ethnoarchaeologists use ethnographic methods, participant observation, and comparative analyses to infer analogies between contemporary behaviors and ancient lifeways. An example of ethnoarchaeology is the study of Maasai pastoralists in East Africa by archaeologist Paul Lane: • Research Focus: Lane conducted ethnographic fieldwork among Maasai communities to document herding practices, settlement patterns, and landscape management strategies. He observed traditional cattle enclosures (bomas), ritual structures (moran), and mobility patterns across seasonal grazing territories. • Archaeological Applications: Lane applied ethnoarchaeological insights to interpret pastoralist settlements, livestock enclosures, and artifact distributions in East African archaeological landscapes. He investigated stone tool production sites, pottery assemblages, and livestock pens to identify cultural continuities, technological innovations, and adaptive responses to environmental change. • Methodological Contributions: Lane's ethnoarchaeological research integrated archaeological surveys with ethnographic data, advancing understandings of pastoralist economies, social organizations, and resilience strategies in arid environments. He used spatial analysis, GIS mapping, and oral histories to reconstruct historical trajectories of Maasai settlement patterns and land use practices. Significance: Ethnoarchaeology, exemplified by Lane's study of Maasai pastoralism, contributes to archaeology by: • Cultural Continuities: Providing analogies for interpreting artifact distributions, settlement layouts, and subsistence strategies in archaeological contexts. • Technological Insights: Documenting traditional craft traditions, tool-use patterns, and material procurement strategies relevant to prehistoric technological innovations and resource exploitation. • Environmental Adaptations: Investigating adaptive strategies, ecological knowledge, and sustainability practices shaping long-term cultural resilience and landscape management among indigenous societies. In summary, ethnoarchaeology enhances archaeological interpretations by integrating ethnographic observations with archaeological data, offering comparative frameworks for reconstructing ancient lifeways, technological innovations, and cultural dynamics across diverse cultural landscapes. Chapter Fifteen Test Questions Landscape and Settlement SAMPLE QUESTIONS Multiple Choice 1) The distribution of hunter-gatherer camps would mostly depend on __________. A. the availability of building materials B. religious considerations C. political considerations D. the availability of water and vegetable foods Answer: D 2) What allowed some Chumash Indians of southern California to live in densely populated, permanent settlements? A. mild climate B. a rich bounty of marine resources C. political interactions with other tribes D. canoe and fishing technologies Answer: B 3) In settlement archaeology, archaeologists study __________. A. concurrent households B. small communities C. modern cultural landscapes D. ancient cultural landscapes Answer: D 4) In the Valley of Oaxaca, houses from around 900 B.C. were usually __________. A. round B. square C. rectangular D. pyramidal Answer: C 5) Activity sets are __________. A. sets of artifacts associated with specific activities B. areas where a specific activity took place C. defined as sets of artifacts associated with particular families or households D. usually defined on the basis of tools used Answer: A 6) Activity areas are __________. A. sets of artifacts associated with specific activities B. areas where a specific activity took place C. defined as sets of artifacts associated with particular families or households D. usually defined on the basis of tools used Answer: B 7) Estimating population size for prehistoric communities is __________. A. generally possible with a high degree of accuracy B. impossible C. very difficult D. not of interest to archaeologists Answer: C 8) George Cowgill and René Millon's study of Teotihuacan focused on __________. A. mapping B. intensive horizontal excavations C. digging deep trenches D. reading archival records of the site Answer: A 9) The city of Teotihuacan __________. A. had no formal layout B. was divided into ten sectors C. was built in concentric circles D. was built in four quadrants Answer: D 10) Currently, the best technique archaeologists have for estimating population relies on __________. A. the number of households B. complex mathematical models C. estimates of the rate of garbage accumulation D. the number of independent species Answer: A 11) The density and distribution of communities can be determined by __________. A. the natural resources of the region and cultural factors B. building materials C. lithic scatters D. sherd density Answer: A 12) Which is defined by artifact patterns that reflect activities which take place around a house? A. activity area B. activity set C. a household unit D. a household cluster Answer: C 13) Settlement patterns __________. A. are studied by geoarchaeologists B. are unrelated between communities C. result from established trade networks D. are the result of relationships between people who decided to place their houses where they did Answer: D 14) The term that refers to a maximal group of persons who normally reside in face-to-face association is __________. A. settlement B. household cluster C. community D. carrying capacity Answer: C 15) "Carrying capacity" may be defined as the __________. A. maximum load one person can carry unaided B. number and density of people a tract of land can support C. maximum weight a horse can pull D. length of time a settlement is occupied Answer: B 16) The economic catchment area of a site may be defined as the __________. A. potential area from which resources may be obtained B. actual area around a site from which food resources are obtained C. area around a site in which hunting occurs D. area where trading activities take place Answer: B 17) Site catchment analysis involves examination of __________. A. economic catchment areas B. the inhabitants’ site-exploitation territories C. both economic catchment area and site-exploitation territory D. environmental exploitation Answer: C 18) Wroxeter, near Shrewsbury in west-central England, __________. A. became the fourth largest Roman town in Britain circa 90 A.D. B. is a phenomenally interesting archaeological project C. is a great site for studying post-processual theory in archaeology D. is part of the overall NATO global missile intercept system Answer: A 19) Vincent Gaffney and colleagues studied the layout of the Wroxeter site using __________. A. GIS B. zooarchaeology C. palynology D. lithic analysis Answer: A 20) Landscapes __________. A. are created by nature B. are created by humans C. have not changed dramatically D. are a minor part of archaeological inquiry Answer: B 21) __________ refers to the area from which the food resources consumed by the inhabitants are obtained. A. Carrying capacity B. Site-catchment C. Economic catchment D. Site-exploitation territory Answer: C 22) __________ is the potential area from which food resources may be obtained. A. Carrying capacity area B. Site-catchment area C. Economic catchment area D. Site-exploitation territory Answer: D 23) Which is not a minimal unit of archaeological analysis? A. house B. household cluster C. activity area D. activity set Answer: D 24) Which refers to the arrangement of structures within a single group? A. household clusters B. communities C. settlements D. villages Answer: B 25) Community population estimates are important because they __________. A. give insights into the community's history B. can give insights into the maximum size a settlement can achieve C. can give information about the size of smaller villages in the region D. are at the heart of cultural ecology Answer: B 26) Archaeologists working in the Copan Valley have discovered that population __________. A. increased rapidly between A.D. 550 and 700 B. declined dramatically around A.D. 500 C. levels changed very little over time D. could not be determined based on the limited archaeological evidence Answer: A Short Answer 27) On what three levels do determinants of settlement patterns operate? Answer: Determinants of settlement patterns operate on three levels: 1. Macro-level: Influenced by regional factors such as topography, resources, climate, and proximity to trade routes or waterways. 2. Meso-level: Shaped by local environmental conditions, including soil fertility, water availability, and natural barriers. 3. Micro-level: Determined by site-specific factors such as defensive advantages, access to raw materials, and cultural preferences for location and orientation. 28) What is the ultimate goal of settlement archaeology? Answer: The ultimate goal of settlement archaeology is to reconstruct and understand past human settlement patterns, including the spatial organization, social structure, economic activities, and cultural dynamics of ancient communities. By studying settlement patterns, archaeologists aim to interpret how and why people chose particular locations for habitation, how settlements evolved over time, and what factors influenced their growth, decline, or abandonment. 29) What is site catchment analysis? Answer: Site catchment analysis is a method used in archaeology to study the relationship between archaeological sites and their surrounding landscapes. It involves mapping and analyzing the geographical extent from which a site's inhabitants likely derived resources and interacted with the environment. This analysis helps archaeologists understand the economic and social interactions of past societies, including resource procurement strategies, trade networks, and settlement subsistence patterns. 30) What is the difference between the economic catchment area of a site and the site exploitation territory? Answer: • Economic Catchment Area: Refers to the geographical area from which a site's inhabitants obtained necessary resources such as food, raw materials, and trade goods. It encompasses the broader region that contributed to the site's economic base and sustenance. • Site Exploitation Territory: Refers to the immediate surroundings and local landscape directly utilized by the inhabitants of a site for daily activities, resource extraction, and subsistence practices. It focuses on the spatial extent where people gathered food, conducted agriculture, hunted, or engaged in other productive activities directly related to sustaining the settlement. In summary, economic catchment area and site exploitation territory are complementary concepts used in settlement archaeology to analyze resource procurement strategies and spatial relationships between ancient sites and their surrounding environments. Essay 31) Discuss in detail the layout of Teotihuacan. How was this determined? Answer: Teotihuacan, located in the Basin of Mexico, is one of the most significant ancient Mesoamerican cities, known for its monumental architecture, urban planning, and cultural influence. The layout of Teotihuacan was determined through a combination of archaeological excavations, remote sensing technologies, and architectural analyses: • Urban Grid: Teotihuacan features a meticulously planned grid layout, characterized by long, wide avenues intersecting at right angles, forming distinct city blocks or 'calpulli'. These avenues, such as the Street of the Dead (Calle de los Muertos), served as major thoroughfares connecting different sectors of the city. • Pyramid Complexes: The city's central axis is dominated by impressive pyramids and ceremonial complexes, including the Pyramid of the Sun, Pyramid of the Moon, and the Temple of the Feathered Serpent (Quetzalcoatl), aligned along a north-south axis. These structures were focal points of religious and political activities. • Residential Areas: Surrounding the central ceremonial core, residential neighborhoods with multi-family apartment compounds (called apartment compounds) extended outward, accommodating the city's population, estimated to have been in the tens of thousands. • Agricultural Fields: Beyond the urban core, archaeological evidence indicates extensive agricultural fields and irrigation systems supporting the city's food supply. Determining the layout of Teotihuacan involved detailed mapping of architectural features, spatial analysis of residential and ceremonial areas, and interpretations based on urban planning principles of Mesoamerican civilizations. Remote sensing technologies such as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) have enhanced understanding by revealing buried structures and landscape features beneath the modern surface. 32) Discuss four variables that act as determinants for the layout of communities. How are they related? Answer: Four variables that act as determinants for the layout of communities include: • Topography: Natural features such as hills, rivers, and valleys influence settlement patterns by providing defensive advantages, access to water, and fertile land for agriculture. Settlements often adapt their layout to fit the contours of the landscape. • Resources: Availability of natural resources such as timber, stone, metals, and fertile soils affects the economic base of communities. Settlements may develop near resource-rich areas to facilitate extraction, trade, and economic specialization. • Social Organization: Cultural norms, kinship ties, and political hierarchies influence the spatial organization of communities. Settlement layouts often reflect social distinctions through the placement of elite residences, communal spaces, and ritual centers. • Defense: Security concerns shape community layouts, with defensive structures, fortified walls, and strategic positioning of settlements to deter external threats and control access points. Defensive considerations often dictate the spatial arrangement of dwellings and public spaces. These variables are interrelated: topographic features influence resource distribution, which in turn impacts economic activities and social interactions within communities. Social organization dictates how resources are allocated and utilized, shaping settlement patterns and spatial divisions. Defense strategies affect where settlements are located and how they are structured to ensure protection and resilience against potential conflicts. 33) What is landscape signature? Answer: Landscape signature refers to distinctive spatial patterns, features, or markers in the natural environment that reflect human activities, cultural practices, and historical interactions within a landscape. Archaeologists use landscape signatures to interpret past human behaviors, settlement patterns, and environmental impacts over time. Examples of landscape signatures include agricultural terraces, irrigation systems, road networks, and ancient monuments that leave enduring imprints on the physical geography of a region. 34) How do archaeologists estimate population size? How reliable are these methods? Answer: Archaeologists estimate population size through various methods, including: • Settlement Size: Calculating the area and density of residential structures within archaeological sites provides estimates of the number of inhabitants based on living space per person ratios observed in historical and ethnographic studies. • Artifact Counts: Analyzing artifact densities such as pottery shards, tools, and food remains within settlements offers insights into population size, assuming proportional consumption rates and discard patterns. • Demographic Models: Applying demographic models based on birth rates, mortality rates, and life expectancy data extrapolated from ethnographic comparisons to estimate past population growth and decline. • Bioarchaeological Evidence: Studying human skeletal remains provides direct evidence of past population demographics, health indicators, and mortality rates, contributing to population reconstructions. The reliability of these methods varies based on data preservation, sampling biases, and interpretative assumptions. Archaeologists often combine multiple lines of evidence and employ statistical techniques to refine population estimates, acknowledging uncertainties and limitations inherent in reconstructing past demographics from archaeological data. In conclusion, settlement layout, landscape signatures, and population estimation are integral components of archaeological research, offering insights into past human behaviors, socio-economic dynamics, and environmental interactions across diverse cultural contexts and historical periods. 35) Discuss the concepts of environment in archaeology. Answer: In archaeology, the concept of environment encompasses both natural and cultural dimensions that influence human societies throughout history. Key aspects of environment in archaeology include: • Natural Environment: Refers to physical surroundings such as climate, topography, geology, hydrology, and flora/fauna. These factors shape resource availability, subsistence strategies, settlement patterns, and adaptive behaviors of past societies. • Cultural Environment: Encompasses human interactions with and perceptions of the natural environment, including land use practices, agricultural techniques, resource management strategies, and spiritual or symbolic associations with natural features. • Environmental Determinism: The idea that environmental factors decisively influence cultural development and historical trajectories. This concept has been critiqued in favor of recognizing the complexity of human-environment interactions and the agency of cultural factors in shaping responses to environmental challenges. • Environmental Archaeology: Subfield focused on reconstructing past environments through archaeological evidence, including pollen analysis, sediment cores, geoarchaeology, and animal bone studies. These methods provide insights into long-term environmental change and its impacts on human societies. Understanding the concept of environment in archaeology involves interdisciplinary approaches, integrating geological, ecological, anthropological, and historical perspectives to elucidate the dynamic interactions between humans and their surroundings across time and space. 36) Discuss the ways in which archaeologists learn about prehistoric environments. Answer: Archaeologists employ various methods to reconstruct prehistoric environments: • Paleoenvironmental Reconstructions: Analyzing sediment cores, pollen records, tree rings (dendrochronology), and ice cores provides insights into past climates, vegetation patterns, and ecological conditions. • Geoarchaeology: Studying soil stratigraphy, sedimentation processes, and landscape evolution helps reconstruct ancient landforms, river systems, and geological contexts that influenced human settlement and resource use. • Faunal Analysis: Examining animal remains (zooarchaeology) reveals past habitats, hunting practices, and ecological interactions between humans and wildlife. • Botanical Studies: Analyzing plant remains (archaeobotany) identifies ancient crops, wild plants, and agricultural practices, offering clues about subsistence strategies and environmental adaptations. • Isotopic Analysis: Investigating stable isotopes in human and animal remains provides dietary information, migration patterns, and environmental conditions experienced by past populations. • Ethnographic Analogy: Using observations of contemporary societies practicing traditional lifeways to infer behaviors and adaptations of ancient cultures facing similar environmental challenges. By integrating these methods, archaeologists reconstruct past environments, elucidate human-environment interactions, and assess the resilience of ancient societies to environmental changes over millennia. 37) Evaluate the most likely conclusion surrounding the collapse of Copan, Honduras. Answer: The collapse of Copan, a major Maya city in present-day Honduras, around the 9th century AD, remains a subject of scholarly debate. Likely conclusions regarding Copan's collapse include: • Environmental Stress: Drought, soil degradation, and deforestation may have strained agricultural productivity, exacerbated by unsustainable land use practices and population growth. • Political Instability: Internal conflicts, elite competition, and social unrest could have weakened political institutions, disrupted trade networks, and undermined societal cohesion. • Economic Decline: Declining trade routes, economic hardships, and resource depletion may have compromised Copan's prosperity and resilience in the face of external pressures. • Cultural Change: Religious shifts, ideological transformations, and changing social norms may have contributed to Copan's decline, affecting community cohesion and collective resilience. • Multifactorial Causes: Copan's collapse likely resulted from a combination of environmental, political, economic, and cultural factors interacting over time, leading to the abandonment or transformation of the city. Archaeological evidence, including inscriptions, architecture, artifact distributions, and paleoenvironmental data, supports interpretations of Copan's collapse as a complex process involving interrelated factors rather than a singular cause. Continued research and interdisciplinary approaches are crucial for refining our understanding of Copan's demise and its broader implications for Maya civilization. 38) What are some key variables affecting the clustering and patterning of agricultural settlements? Answer: Several key variables influence the clustering and patterning of agricultural settlements: • Topography: Favorable landforms, such as river valleys, plains, and slopes, provide fertile soils, water access, and natural drainage, attracting settlement clustering. • Water Resources: Proximity to rivers, lakes, springs, and irrigation systems supports agricultural productivity and settlement aggregation around reliable water sources. • Soil Fertility: Nutrient-rich soils suitable for farming activities attract agricultural communities, promoting settlement clustering for sustained crop yields. • Climate: Moderate climates with adequate rainfall or access to irrigation facilitate agricultural intensification and settlement concentration in productive regions. • Transportation Routes: Accessibility to trade routes, roads, and navigable waterways enhances economic connectivity, promoting the development of market centers and urban agglomerations. These variables interact dynamically, shaping the spatial distribution, size, and social organization of agricultural settlements across diverse cultural landscapes and historical contexts. 39) Discuss the concept of carrying capacity. What is it, and how is it determined? Answer: Carrying capacity refers to the maximum population size that an environment can sustainably support without causing long-term environmental degradation or resource depletion. Determining carrying capacity involves: • Resource Availability: Assessing the quantity and quality of essential resources such as food, water, shelter, and energy sources within a given area. • Environmental Constraints: Considering ecological factors such as climate variability, soil fertility, biodiversity, and natural hazards that impact resource availability and human well-being. • Technological and Social Factors: Evaluating technological innovations, agricultural practices, resource management strategies, and cultural adaptations that affect resource use efficiency and sustainability. • Carrying Capacity Models: Applying mathematical models, demographic projections, and ecological simulations to estimate optimal population sizes based on resource carrying capacities and environmental resilience. The concept of carrying capacity informs sustainable development practices, land use planning, and conservation strategies by balancing human needs with environmental constraints to ensure long-term ecological integrity and societal well-being. In summary, understanding environment concepts, prehistoric environmental reconstructions, the collapse of ancient civilizations like Copan, factors affecting settlement clustering, and carrying capacity provides insights into how archaeologists interpret human-environment interactions and societal resilience throughout history. Test Bank for In the Beginning: An Introduction to Archaeology Brian M. Fagan, Nadia Durrani 9780205968039
Download
Close
Close
