This Document Contains Chapters 1 to 2 Chapter 1: Differing Perspectives on Quality Chapter Outline Differing Perspectives on Quality What is Quality? Recognizing both Product and Service Dimensions of Quality Differing Functional Perspectives on Quality Three Spheres of Quality Other Perspectives on Quality Arriving at a Common Understanding of Quality Using a Contingency Perspective of Quality Overview The entire concept of quality is what one of my professors once called an “arm-waiver.” We all intuitively know what it means, yet when we are asked to explain it, we just sort of wave our arms. Chapter 1 defines the terms. The author references various definitions of quality. He makes the distinction between service and manufacturing from a quality perspective and delves into “The Supply Chain.” Consideration of quality as it applies to the modern supply chain expands our understanding of its application. Professor Foster has taken the concept of the supply chain and made it integral to the subject of quality. Any book on quality must discuss Deming. The author makes reference to Deming throughout the book. The focal point of the chapter is the question “What is Quality?” Professor Foster supplies a list of topics product and service quality that can be ideally used in a class discussion: Performance Features Reliability Conformance Durability Tangibles Service reliability Responsiveness Assurance Empathy Availability Professionalism Timeliness The author looks at quality from different perspectives. This list is also an excellent starting point for class discussion: Supply chain Engineering Operations Strategic management Marketing Financial Human resources Figure 1-1 A Global Supply Chain Model Source: Foster, S. Thomas; Sampson, Scott E.; Wallin, Cynthia; Webb, Scott W, Managing Supply Chain And Operations: An Integrative Approach, 1st Ed., © 2016, p.15. Reprinted and Electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., New York, NY. Chapter 1 will ideally fit into a standard 100-minute class period. Discussion Questions 1. Why is quality a difficult term to define? How can we improve our understanding of quality? This is an ideal question to open the discussion of the topic of quality. Ask the class to define quality and record their comments. You will typically find a myriad of answers, but there should be a common theme among them. Quality is a difficult term to define because it is a multifaceted concept that varies depending on the context, perspective, and criteria used for evaluation. What one person considers "high quality" may differ from another's perspective based on their needs, expectations, and experiences. Additionally, quality can refer to various aspects, such as performance, durability, reliability, aesthetics, and customer satisfaction, making it challenging to pin down a single, universal definition. Reasons for the Difficulty in Defining Quality: 1. Subjectivity: Quality is often subjective and can vary from person to person based on individual preferences and priorities. 2. Context-Dependence: The definition of quality can change depending on the industry, product, or service being evaluated. For example, quality in a luxury car may emphasize craftsmanship and materials, while in a software product, it might focus on usability and performance. 3. Multiple Dimensions: Quality encompasses several dimensions, such as product quality, service quality, and process quality, each with its criteria. 4. Evolving Standards: The standards and expectations for quality can evolve over time, influenced by technological advancements, changing consumer demands, and industry trends. Improving Understanding of Quality: 1. Develop Clear Criteria: Establishing clear, measurable criteria for evaluating quality in a specific context can help clarify what constitutes high quality. This might include performance metrics, customer feedback, compliance with standards, and other relevant factors. 2. Consider Multiple Perspectives: To develop a more comprehensive understanding of quality, it's essential to consider the perspectives of different stakeholders, including customers, suppliers, and employees. 3. Continuous Improvement: Emphasize continuous improvement practices, such as Total Quality Management (TQM) or Six Sigma, which focus on refining processes and products to enhance quality over time. 4. Use of Standards and Frameworks: Adopting recognized quality standards and frameworks, such as ISO 9001, can provide a structured approach to defining and maintaining quality across an organization. By considering these factors and approaches, organizations and individuals can develop a more nuanced and practical understanding of quality, tailored to their specific needs and contexts. 2. Briefly discuss Garvin’s eight dimensions of quality. Is Garvin’s multidimensional approach a step forward in improving our understanding of quality? Why or why not? Garvin lists the following: Performance Features Reliability Conformance Durability Serviceability Aesthetics Perceived quality Using Garvin’s terminology, these terms identify five different aspects of quality. One might say, “Quality is in the eye of the consumer.” 3. Is there a difference between service quality and product quality? If so, what are the implications of these differences for a manager of a service business, such as a restaurant or a retail store? Service quality suggests an achievement in a level of customer service and is more subjective than the definition of product quality that is related to a tangible product. Service quality is more difficult to define because of its numerous customer variations, and it is therefore more difficult to achieve quality success based on this wide latitude of customer opinion. You can demonstrate this in class buy surveying, for example, the service quality of a major brand (e.g., AT&T, Verizon, etc.) and then surveying the opinions of the class regarding one or more service quality dimensions. Yes, there is a difference between service quality and product quality. Understanding these differences is crucial for managers in service-oriented businesses, such as restaurants or retail stores, as it influences how they approach quality management. Differences Between Service Quality and Product Quality: 1. Tangibility: • Product Quality: Refers to the tangible, physical characteristics of a product, such as durability, performance, and design. Quality can be measured objectively by testing the product against set standards. • Service Quality: Involves intangible aspects, such as the level of customer service, the atmosphere of the establishment, and the overall customer experience. Service quality is more subjective and depends on customer perceptions. 2. Consistency: • Product Quality: Products can be mass-produced to consistent standards, allowing for uniformity in quality across all units. • Service Quality: Services are delivered by people, making it more challenging to maintain consistency. The quality of service can vary depending on who provides it, when it is provided, and the context in which it is provided. 3. Customer Involvement: • Product Quality: Customers typically have little involvement in the production process. They assess quality after the product is complete. • Service Quality: Customers are often involved in the service delivery process (e.g., dining at a restaurant or shopping in a store). Their experience is shaped by the interaction between them and the service provider. 4. Perishability: • Product Quality: Products can be stored, inventoried, and used at a later time. They do not perish immediately after production. • Service Quality: Services are perishable and cannot be stored. Once a service is provided, it cannot be reused or resold, meaning quality must be delivered consistently in real-time. Implications for a Manager of a Service Business: 1. Focus on Customer Experience: • Managers need to prioritize customer experience since service quality is closely tied to customer perceptions. This involves training staff to deliver consistent, high-quality service, ensuring the environment is pleasant, and addressing customer concerns promptly. 2. Employee Training and Development: • Since services are delivered by people, it's essential to invest in training and development to ensure that employees can consistently meet quality standards. Empowering employees to handle various situations can help maintain service quality. 3. Managing Variability: • Managers must develop strategies to manage and minimize variability in service delivery. This might include standardizing procedures, monitoring performance, and providing feedback to employees. 4. Monitoring and Feedback: • Gathering and analyzing customer feedback is critical for understanding and improving service quality. Managers should implement systems to capture customer perceptions and respond quickly to issues that arise. 5. Creating a Strong Service Culture: • Managers should cultivate a service-oriented culture where employees understand the importance of customer satisfaction and take pride in delivering high-quality service. By recognizing the unique aspects of service quality compared to product quality, managers in service businesses can more effectively design strategies to enhance customer satisfaction and maintain a competitive edge. 4. Define the concept of empathy. On page 6, the concept of empathy is discussed: Finally, consumers of services desire empathy from the service provider. In other words, the customer desires caring, individualized attention from the service firm. The author’s discussion of empathy uses the relationship between a waiter and customer. You might extend this conversation by asking for other examples. Does empathy enter into a manufacturing situation? Dilbert’s Pointy-Haired-Manager is an excellent tool for this discussion. Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings, thoughts, and experiences of others. It involves putting oneself in another person's shoes, recognizing their emotions, and responding with care and compassion. 5. Why is communication within an organization an important part of the quality improvement process? On page 6, the author says: It is difficult to devise a coherent strategic plan relating to quality when communication is imprecise. Think about the people involved. Do the marketer, engineer, order processor, and manager all speak the “same language?” Communication enables planning. In a multidimensional environment, communication becomes more difficult simply due to different backgrounds. How do you make this happen? What are the priorities that must be shared? Communication within an organization is crucial to the quality improvement process because it ensures that everyone is aligned on goals, understands expectations, shares information efficiently, and collaborates effectively. It helps identify issues, gather feedback, and implement solutions, leading to continuous improvement and higher overall quality. 6. Compare and contrast the engineering perspective and marketing perspective of quality? How could an overemphasis on the engineering perspective work to the disadvantage of a business organization? The textbook (page 13) says: The marketer focuses on the perceived quality of products and services as opposed to the engineering based conformance definition of quality. The question then asks whether the engineering approach could be self-defeating. This is pretty much a follow-up to question 5. Do the communications styles and backgrounds influence the marketer and the engineer? What are the goals of the engineer? What are the goals of the marketer? Do they coincide or conflict? What should the goals be in an efficiently run organization? Engineering Perspective of Quality: • Focuses on technical specifications, reliability, performance, and adherence to standards. • Emphasizes product functionality, durability, and minimizing defects. Marketing Perspective of Quality: • Focuses on customer satisfaction, meeting or exceeding customer expectations, and perceived value. • Emphasizes design, features, and how well the product meets customer needs. Comparison: • Engineering is concerned with the internal, technical excellence of a product, while marketing is concerned with how the product is perceived by and satisfies customers. Contrast: • Engineering aims for perfection in design and production, whereas marketing prioritizes customer desires and market trends, even if it means compromising on some technical aspects. Disadvantage of Overemphasis on Engineering Perspective: • An overemphasis on the engineering perspective can lead to products that are technically superior but do not align with customer preferences or market demands. This can result in high production costs, products that are over-engineered, and ultimately poor sales, negatively impacting the business. 7. Describe the “systems view” that underlies modern quality management thinking. Which of the perspectives of quality discussed in Chapter 1 is most closely aligned with the systems view? Some discussion questions might be: What is the systems view? What do the approaches have in common? How are the approaches different? How do the different approaches affect the ultimate consumer? This diagram depicts the basic approach to planning. The “systems view” in modern quality management emphasizes that an organization is a complex, interrelated network of processes, where each part affects the others. It focuses on understanding and improving the entire system rather than just individual components, ensuring that all processes work together efficiently to enhance overall quality. The "value perspective" of quality, which focuses on delivering products and services that meet or exceed customer expectations at a reasonable cost, is most closely aligned with the systems view. This perspective considers the entire system's role in creating value for the customer. 8. Why is planning an important part of the quality process? How could a firm’s quality management initiatives be adversely affected if planning was not a part of the process? Refer back to the question on communication (question 5). You might review Garvin’s list: Performance Features Reliability Conformance Durability Serviceability Aesthetics Perceived quality Which of these are the most dependent upon planning? Are any of them unaffected by planning? Does poor planning adversely affect any of these items more than others? Planning is crucial in the quality process because it sets clear goals, defines standards, allocates resources, and establishes timelines for quality improvement efforts. Without proper planning, quality management initiatives can lack direction, coordination, and consistency, leading to inefficient use of resources, missed opportunities for improvement, and ultimately, failure to meet quality objectives. 9. Research has shown that quality is still a major concern of the majority of CEOs in American corporations. Is this level of concern about quality warranted? Please explain your answer. A discussion about the competition between American and foreign products would be productive. How has the automotive industry been affected by the apparent quality or lack of quality of foreign cars? Have other industries been affected in this manner? Has the movement of our nation from manufacturing to service been affected by quality, either actual or perceived? Yes, the concern about quality among CEOs is warranted because quality directly impacts customer satisfaction, brand reputation, and competitive advantage. High-quality products and services lead to customer loyalty, reduced costs from fewer defects, and compliance with regulatory standards. In an increasingly competitive global market, maintaining high quality is essential for sustaining market share and profitability. Therefore, CEOs must prioritize quality to ensure their organizations remain competitive and successful. 10. What is meant by the phrase cost of quality? How can this phrase help a firm address its quality concerns? The article Quality Strategy at GE contains the following statement: GE denied that such problems forced GE to adopt its new quality program. “We are not in trouble,” they said, citing the robust profits. But they conceded that “the time wasted, the money wasted, in field fixes, in quality problems, in working things out, across corporate America, across the world, is enormous.” Does this give you any insight into the attitudes at GE after Welch’s departure? What other aspects that have been discussed apply here? Look at the American automobile industry again. Is the comparison that is being made between GE and the American automobile industry valid? How does long-range planning affect quality in cases like these? The phrase cost of quality refers to the total expenses associated with ensuring and maintaining product or service quality, including costs for prevention, appraisal, and failure (both internal and external). Understanding the cost of quality helps a firm identify where inefficiencies and defects occur, allowing them to target improvements that reduce waste, lower overall costs, and enhance quality, ultimately leading to better financial performance and customer satisfaction. 11. What are the major differences between traditional human resource management and total quality human resource management? How does total quality human resource management transcend traditional human resource management in regard to providing an environment that is supportive of quality concerns? The table below lays out the question succinctly. This table should be an excellent springboard for in-class discussion. HRM versus TQHRM Traditional HRM TQHRM Process characteristics Unilateral role Consulting role Centralization Decentralization Pull Release Administrative Developmental Content characteristics Nomothetic Pluralistic Compartmentalized Holistic Worker-oriented System-oriented Performance measures Satisfaction measures Job-based Person-base SOURCE: Adapted from R. Cardy and G. H. Dobbins, “Human Resources Management in a Total Quality Environment,” Journal of Quality Management 1, 1 (1996):3. Traditional HRM focuses on administrative tasks and individual performance evaluations, while Total Quality HRM (TQHRM) integrates HR practices with quality management principles. TQHRM transcends traditional HRM by: 1. Promoting Continuous Improvement: Aligning employee development with quality goals. 2. Encouraging Employee Involvement: Actively involving employees in quality initiatives. 3. Ensuring Alignment: Integrating HR practices with organizational quality objectives. This creates a supportive environment for addressing quality concerns effectively. 12. Describe the three spheres of quality. How do these spheres provide another way to place the field of quality in perspective? Notice the three quality descriptors: Management Assurance Control How do they differ? How are they the same? Notice that the Venn diagram above shows overlap. What are the implications of the overlapped areas? Where does quality management end and where does quality assurance begin? How does quality control fit into the picture? These spheres provide a holistic perspective on quality by showing how quality is not just about inspecting finished products (QC) but also about ensuring processes are effective (QA) and aligning the entire organization’s strategy and culture with quality principles (QM). Together, they highlight the importance of integrating quality into all aspects of an organization. 13. Discuss the value-added perspective on quality. What are the implications of this perspective for the manager of a business organization? A value-added activity can be pinpointed by asking, “Would this activity matter to the customer?” In other words, in most cases, a value-added activity will have economic value to the customer. Looking back at the GE example that is discussed in question 10: How does value added enter into the discussion? Look at our consumer goods: does the concept of value added influence your purchasing decisions? Can you actually identify a value-added component? Is value added more obvious by it presence or absence? More generally, how is quality a value-added item? Getting back to the automobile industry, how did the influx of Japanese cars in the 1960s reflect on the concept of quality adding value to a product? The value-added perspective on quality focuses on enhancing the value of a product or service from the customer's point of view. It considers quality as the ability to meet or exceed customer expectations and provide benefits that justify the price. Implications for the Manager: 1. Customer Focus: Managers should prioritize understanding and meeting customer needs and preferences to deliver products or services that provide real value. 2. Continuous Improvement: Emphasizing value addition requires ongoing improvements to enhance features, performance, and customer satisfaction. 3. Cost Efficiency: Managers need to balance adding value with cost efficiency, ensuring that improvements do not lead to excessive costs that outweigh the benefits. 4. Differentiation: By focusing on value, managers can differentiate their offerings from competitors, enhancing market position and customer loyalty. In summary, the value-added perspective drives managers to align quality efforts with customer value, leading to more effective strategies for enhancing satisfaction and maintaining competitive advantage. 14. How does contingency theory inform decision making when implementing improvement efforts? Page 19 states: Contingency theory presupposes that there is no theory or method for operating a business that can be applied in all instances A company that defines part of its mission as "valuing and satisfying our customers through personalized service" likely will pursue a different technological approach toward its customers than a company with the mission of "applying technology to solve customer problems." The contingency approach to quality also helps settle the different perceptions concerning the definition of quality, for example: Do you as a consumer feel that quality is not as important in a lower priced item? When a product has been on the market for an extended period of time, do you still observe quality? Do you have different expectations of quality for a high priced item than you do for an inexpensive item? Why? Do you have the same expectation of quality on similarly priced items based upon their use or application, for example, food vs. clothing? 15. Should a firm consider the law of diminishing marginal returns when striving to improve quality? Why or why not? On page 14, the statement is made that there is a point where the continued quest for quality becomes uneconomical. Figure 1-6 illustrates this concept. Is there a subtle problem here? How might the quality of one product affect the perception of overall product quality? How does the cost of quality affect other products when the cost of quality on another product has proven uneconomical? In that situation, what choices exist? Can you think of any examples? Yes, a firm should consider the law of diminishing marginal returns when striving to improve quality. This economic principle states that, beyond a certain point, additional input or investment yields progressively smaller increases in output or benefit. Why It Matters: 1. Resource Allocation: Understanding this law helps firms allocate resources more effectively by avoiding excessive investments that yield minimal quality improvements. 2. Cost-Benefit Analysis: It ensures that the costs of additional quality improvements are justified by the benefits gained, preventing wasteful spending. 3. Balanced Approach: It encourages a balanced approach to quality improvements, where efforts are focused on areas with the highest potential impact rather than endless incremental gains. By considering this principle, firms can make more informed decisions about where and how to invest in quality improvements to achieve the best overall results. 16. Are the perspectives of quality independent of one another? If not, describe ways in which they are interrelated. This chapter is named Differing Perspectives on Quality. Does the author make the point? List the perspectives and identify the differences and similarities. Are there any trends or common points? On what are these perspectives based? Given the preceding questions, what conclusions can you make? No, the perspectives of quality are not independent of one another; they are interrelated and often overlap. Here’s how they are connected: 1. Quality Control and Quality Assurance: • Quality Control (QC) involves inspecting products and services to ensure they meet standards. Quality Assurance (QA) focuses on improving processes to prevent defects. Effective QA can reduce the number of issues that need to be addressed through QC, demonstrating their interdependence. 2. Quality Assurance and Quality Management: • Quality Assurance ensures that processes are capable of producing quality outcomes. Quality Management (QM) encompasses the broader strategy, including QA, to align organizational goals with quality standards. QA is a component of QM, helping to implement the strategic vision for quality. 3. Quality Management and Quality Control: • Quality Management involves strategic planning and continuous improvement efforts, which guide and influence Quality Control practices. QM provides the framework within which QC operates, ensuring that QC activities are aligned with organizational quality objectives. Overall, these perspectives work together to create a comprehensive approach to quality, integrating process improvements, strategic planning, and operational checks to achieve and maintain high standards. 17. How can an understanding of the multiple dimensions of quality lead to improved product and service designs? As identified earlier, Garvin identified eight dimensions of quality: Performance Features Reliability Conformance Durability Serviceability Aesthetics Perceived quality Do they apply differently to products or services? How does each of these dimensions directly apply to a product or a service? Understanding the multiple dimensions of quality—such as performance, reliability, durability, aesthetics, and customer satisfaction—can lead to improved product and service designs by: 1. Identifying Key Attributes: Recognizing various quality dimensions helps designers focus on critical attributes that matter most to customers, ensuring that products and services meet diverse needs and expectations. 2. Balancing Trade-offs: Understanding different quality dimensions allows for better balancing of trade-offs between features, cost, and performance, leading to designs that optimize overall value. 3. Enhancing Customer Satisfaction: By addressing multiple dimensions of quality, designers can create products and services that offer superior performance, reliability, and aesthetic appeal, leading to higher customer satisfaction and loyalty. 4. Informing Design Decisions: Insights into different quality aspects guide decision-making throughout the design process, from selecting materials and technologies to determining usability and ergonomics. 5. Facilitating Continuous Improvement: A comprehensive understanding of quality dimensions supports ongoing evaluation and refinement, allowing for iterative improvements based on feedback and performance metrics. Overall, incorporating multiple quality dimensions into the design process ensures that products and services are well-rounded, effectively meeting customer needs and expectations while maintaining competitive advantage. 18. What is your concept of quality? Is it multidimensional, or does it focus on a single dimension such as features, reliability, or conformance? Explain your answer. Do you react differently as a consumer or a supplier? Can you use these attitudes in business? As we have discussed, marketing and manufacturing approach quality from different perspectives. What are the common points? How does management deal with the differences or the similarities? My concept of quality is multidimensional. Quality encompasses various aspects that contribute to the overall value and effectiveness of a product or service, including: 1. Features: The attributes or functionalities that meet customer needs and desires. 2. Reliability: The consistency of performance over time and under different conditions. 3. Durability: The longevity and ability to withstand wear and tear. 4. Aesthetics: The visual and sensory appeal of the product or service. 5. Conformance: Adherence to predefined standards and specifications. 6. Customer Satisfaction: The degree to which a product or service meets or exceeds customer expectations. Focusing on a single dimension, such as features or reliability, may lead to an imbalanced approach that overlooks other important aspects of quality. A multidimensional view ensures that all relevant factors are considered, leading to a more comprehensive understanding and delivery of quality that enhances customer satisfaction and competitive advantage. 19. Describe an instance in which you and a coworker (or superior) perceived the needs of a customer very differently. How did your differences in perception influence how each of you wanted to meet your customer’s needs? What aspects of quality made the most difference to you or your co-worker? Does your superior view quality in the same manner as you do? Why? In the class environment, do your needs and expectations differ from that of your instructors? Does the question of quality differ for you and your instructors? In a hypothetical scenario, suppose you and a coworker were both responsible for addressing a customer's complaint about a product. You might perceive the customer's need as a request for a product replacement due to a defect, focusing on immediate resolution and customer satisfaction. Meanwhile, your coworker might view the need as an opportunity to address underlying quality issues in the product and suggest a more thorough review of the production process. Influence of Differences in Perception: 1. Approach to Resolution: • Your Approach: Focuses on quickly resolving the issue by replacing the product, aiming to maintain customer satisfaction and trust. • Coworker’s Approach: Aims to prevent future issues by addressing root causes and improving the product, potentially leading to long-term improvements but taking more time. 2. Customer Communication: • Your Approach: Involves straightforward communication about the replacement process, ensuring the customer feels heard and valued. • Coworker’s Approach: Might involve a more detailed discussion about the steps being taken to improve product quality, which could reassure the customer about long-term improvements but might seem less immediate. 3. Impact on Customer Experience: • Your Approach: Provides a quick fix, enhancing immediate customer satisfaction. • Coworker’s Approach: Focuses on systemic improvements, which could lead to higher quality and reduced future issues but might not address the current customer’s immediate concern as quickly. Ultimately, reconciling these differing perceptions involves balancing immediate customer needs with long-term quality improvements, ensuring both short-term satisfaction and sustainable product quality. Case Study 1-1: FedEx: Managing Quality Day and Night This cast study provides insight into the unique problems faced by a service-based company. Central to this discussion are three questions that the company asks its employees: What do you need from me? What do you do with what I give you? Are there any gaps between what I give you and what I need? This case also introduces the topic of Quality Improvement Process (QIP). This might be a good time to set the tone of future lectures. This case study might be an excellent one to use early in the semester. Case Questions: 1. What is FedEx’s “common language” of quality? Is it important for a company to establish a “common language” of quality? If so, why? How does Fedex’s three-pronged “People-Service-Profit” reflect quality? How does Fedex’s twelve component “Service Quality Indicator” reduce communications difficulties. FedEx's "common language" of quality refers to a shared understanding and set of principles for assessing and improving quality within the company. It emphasizes consistent definitions and expectations across all levels of the organization to ensure alignment in quality standards and practices. Establishing a "common language" of quality is crucial for a company because it helps ensure that everyone is on the same page regarding what quality means and how it should be measured. This common understanding facilitates clearer communication, better collaboration, and more effective implementation of quality improvement initiatives. 2. There are several different perspectives of quality, including the operations perspective, the strategic perspective, the marketing perspective, the financial perspective, the HR perspective, and the systems perspective. Which of these perspectives are being emphasized by FedEx? Why? Does the “common language” allow personnel to cross boundaries? Does inclusion of management in the teams affect the concept of quality? The SQI is a cross-functional tool. How does this affect the situation? The case states that the SQI “ensures the involvement of frontline employees, support personnel, and managers from all parts of the corporation when needed.” Do the employee incentives assist this as well? FedEx emphasizes the operations perspective and the HR perspective in its approach to quality. • Operations Perspective: FedEx focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of its operational processes. The company’s emphasis on asking employees what they need, how they use what is provided, and identifying any gaps highlights a concern for operational excellence and continuous improvement. • HR Perspective: The questions posed to employees also reflect a strong emphasis on the human resources aspect of quality management. By addressing employee needs and feedback, FedEx aims to align employee capabilities and resources with the company's quality standards, fostering a supportive work environment that can drive quality improvements. These perspectives are crucial for FedEx because they ensure that operational processes are optimized and that employees are well-supported, which together contribute to overall quality and performance. 3. Is FedEx’s level of emphasis on quality appropriate? Why or why not? Who is FedEx’s competition? Is quality a focal point in this industry? How does the customer measure quality? What specific attributes do the customers use to judge quality? FedEx's level of emphasis on quality is appropriate given the nature of its business. As a global logistics and delivery company, quality is critical to maintaining reliability and customer satisfaction. High emphasis on quality ensures that: 1. Operational Efficiency: FedEx operates on tight schedules and depends on precise execution. Emphasizing quality helps minimize errors, delays, and inefficiencies. 2. Customer Satisfaction: High quality directly impacts customer trust and loyalty. Ensuring quality in every aspect of service helps FedEx meet customer expectations consistently. 3. Employee Engagement: By focusing on employee needs and feedback, FedEx fosters a productive and motivated workforce, which is essential for maintaining high standards of quality. 4. Competitive Advantage: In a highly competitive industry, maintaining high quality helps FedEx stand out from competitors and reinforces its reputation as a reliable service provider. Overall, FedEx’s emphasis on quality aligns with its strategic goals and operational demands, making it an appropriate approach for ensuring continued success and customer satisfaction. Case Study 1-2: Granite Rock Company: Achieving Quality through Employees This case presents quality through the management perspective. A strategy for using this case might be to ask the students to list the specific steps taken by Management to address the quality issue. The case also discusses the individual employees IPDP, the Individual Personal Development Plan. It might be interesting to contrast this approach with both Managing by Objectives (MBO) and Managing by Exception (MBE). These are two methods of management that have gained a major foothold in industry and could yield a good discussion. Case Questions: 1. Rather than focusing on human resource management (HRM) as a means of supporting its quality initiatives, Granite Rock could have chosen another area as its focal point (i.e., marketing, operations, information systems, and so on). How does a focus on HRM support a company’s quality initiatives? This statement might be the key: The managers at Granite Rock knew that a resulting decline in customer satisfaction was inevitable and responded to this self-assessment by deciding it needed to become more customer focused. …As explained by CEO Bruce Woolpert, you can’t have employees out telling customers “yes” unless everyone else in the company knows how to follow up on “yes.” How does the focus on individual employee growth fit within the guidelines of HRM? Focusing on Human Resource Management (HRM) supports a company’s quality initiatives in several key ways: 1. Employee Engagement and Development: HRM practices such as Individual Personal Development Plans (IPDPs) help ensure that employees are skilled, motivated, and aligned with the company’s quality goals. Investing in employee development improves their capabilities, which directly enhances quality. 2. Consistency and Standardization: HRM establishes consistent training and performance standards, ensuring that all employees adhere to the same quality benchmarks. This consistency helps maintain high quality across all levels of the organization. 3. Performance Management: Effective HRM includes setting clear expectations and goals for employees, monitoring performance, and providing feedback. This supports quality initiatives by ensuring that employees are aware of and working towards quality standards. 4. Recruitment and Retention: By focusing on hiring the right talent and retaining high performers, HRM ensures that the company has a skilled workforce capable of meeting quality standards. This is crucial for maintaining and improving quality over time. 5. Cultural Alignment: HRM helps to shape and reinforce a quality-focused organizational culture. A strong culture of quality encourages employees to prioritize and contribute to quality improvement efforts. In summary, focusing on HRM supports quality initiatives by developing and managing a capable workforce, ensuring consistency, and fostering a quality-oriented culture. 2. Discuss the different components of Granite Rock’s HRM initiatives. How can each of these components support the company’s quality efforts? The list of initiatives might include: Employee training Individual Personal Training Plan (IDPD) Atmosphere of trust between management and rank-and-file Winning the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award While on the surface these might seem to be independent items, how are they related in actuality? What is the effect of these items on the individual employee? Granite Rock’s HRM initiatives include: 1. Individual Personal Development Plans (IPDPs): Tailored development helps employees improve skills crucial for quality. 2. Training and Development: Keeps employees updated on best practices and quality standards. 3. Performance Management: Sets clear quality goals and provides feedback to enhance performance. 4. Recruitment and Selection: Ensures hiring of skilled individuals committed to quality. 5. Compensation and Rewards: Incentivizes quality performance through rewards. 6. Employee Involvement and Empowerment: Encourages ownership and innovation in quality improvements. Each component supports quality efforts by developing skills, maintaining standards, and motivating employees. 3. Discuss CEO Woolpert’s feelings about communication with the customers (paragraph 2). What happens when others in the company don’t know what has been promised to the customer? How can quality management help to overcome this situation? The key sentence in this paragraph is: As explained by CEO Bruce Woolpert, you can’t have employees out telling customers “yes” unless everyone else in the company knows how to follow up on “yes.” While there had been discussion of the impact that management has upon quality, if the employees do not feel empowered, quality will suffer. Do the actions that are directly aimed at the employees affect quality? This communication is perhaps the core of the topic. CEO Woolpert emphasizes the importance of clear communication with customers to ensure that promises and expectations are well-understood. When others in the company are unaware of what has been promised to the customer, it can lead to inconsistencies and failures in meeting customer expectations, resulting in dissatisfaction and potential loss of trust. Quality management can help overcome this situation by: 1. Implementing Standardized Communication Procedures: Establishing clear protocols for communicating customer promises and expectations across the organization. 2. Utilizing CRM Systems: Employing customer relationship management (CRM) systems to record and track customer interactions and commitments, ensuring that all relevant employees have access to accurate information. 3. Regular Training: Training employees on the importance of consistent communication and the specific commitments made to customers. 4. Feedback Mechanisms: Creating mechanisms for regularly reviewing and addressing any discrepancies between promises made and service delivered. By integrating these practices, quality management ensures that all employees are aligned with customer expectations, thereby maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction. Websites of Interest http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/ -- The home site for the Baldridge National Quality Program http://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/quality-tools.html -- American Society for Quality http://www.thecqi.org/ -- Chartered Quality Institute http://www.managementhelp.org/plan_dec/mbo/mbo.htm -- A detailed look at Management by Objectives http://www.ge.com/en/company/companyinfo/quality/whatis.htm -- An overview of Six Sigma from GE’s perspective Chapter 2: Quality Theory Chapter Outline Quality Theory What is Theory? Leading Contributors to Quality Theory W. Edward Deming Joseph M. Duran Kaoru Ishikawa Armand Feigenbaum Philip Crosby Genichi Taguchi The Rest of the Pack Viewing Quality from a Contingency Perspective Resolving the Differences in Quality Approaches: An Integrative Approach Overview When the author discusses theory, he is not being philosophical; rather he discusses the major “players” and their contributions to the subject. On page 26, the point is made that “there is not a unified theory explaining quality improvement.” The author also makes a statement that quality improvement is positively linked to employee morale. He links quality improvement to the classic Theory X approach to management (and Theory Z for that matter). Discussion Questions 1. Define theory. Why are theories important for managing quality in the supply chain? The author states that in order for a theory to be complete, it has to answer these questions: What? How? Why? Who? Where? When? How does practice relate to theory? You might also ask how this relates to the classic definition of theory that we have studied in other disciplines. The model the text presents is illustrated in Figure 2-1. A positive correlation is presented between Quality Improvement and Worker Morale. To verify the model, we conduct statistical research. This will either prove or disprove the theory. Theory is a systematic framework of ideas and principles used to explain phenomena, predict outcomes, and guide decision-making. It provides a structured way of understanding and interpreting various aspects of a subject. Theories are important for managing quality in the supply chain because: 1. Guidance for Decision-Making: They offer frameworks for making informed decisions and addressing quality issues effectively. 2. Predictive Power: Theories help predict potential problems and outcomes, allowing for proactive measures to ensure quality. 3. Consistency: They provide consistent methods and standards for managing quality across different stages of the supply chain. 4. Continuous Improvement: Theories support the development of strategies for ongoing quality enhancement and problem-solving. By applying relevant theories, organizations can systematically improve their supply chain quality and achieve better performance outcomes. 2. Describe the differences between induction and deduction. If you developed a theory based solely on your experiences of quality practices in business organizations, would you be basing your theory on induction or deduction? Why? On page 25, the text discusses a Morale Check at a Chicago-based company just after the Cubs won the World Series. Morale is found to be positive. Students must decide: is this inductive or deductive? What are examples of inductive and deductive theory from the class’s perspective. If one looks at the classic theories – Evolution, Relatively, Theory X, Y, and Z – are they individually inductive or deductive? If the theory is generated by observation and experience, the theory is inductive. If the theory is developed through the Scientific method, it is deductive. Does the fact that in the case the Cubs just won the World Series apply? Does this make the theory deductive or inductive? Induction involves deriving general principles from specific observations or experiences, while deduction involves applying general principles to specific cases to make predictions or draw conclusions. If you developed a theory based solely on your experiences of quality practices in business organizations, you would be using induction. This is because you are generalizing from specific instances of quality practices to form broader principles or theories. 3. Do you believe that the development of a unified theory of quality management is possible? What is a unified theory? On page 26, “A Closer Look at Quality - The Product That is Quality” looks at the different approaches to quality. As you discuss the key players, this might be a good question to keep going on the side. Einstein spent most of his later life searching for a unified theory in physics. He failed. Do unified theories exist in any discipline? What would the implications be if there was a unified theory for quality management? If you contrast the approaches of the major players, do they all take the same approach? Does the fact that we are dealing with people affect this situation? A unified theory is a comprehensive framework that integrates various concepts and principles into a single, cohesive explanation or model. The development of a unified theory of quality management is challenging but potentially possible. It would require: 1. Integration of Diverse Approaches: Combining different quality management theories and practices, such as Total Quality Management, Six Sigma, and Lean. 2. Consensus on Core Principles: Identifying and agreeing on fundamental principles that apply across various contexts and industries. 3. Adaptability: Ensuring the theory can be adapted to different organizational sizes, structures, and sectors. A unified theory could provide a holistic understanding and consistent approach to managing quality, but achieving this would require significant effort and collaboration across the field. 4. Why do managers need to be cautious about purchasing material (e.g., courses, workbooks, videos, and so on) on quality management from trainers and consultants? How would you go about selecting this type of material? In the quoted article, The Product That is Quality, the statement is made that, “Within each approach, corporate managers are confronted by a numbing maze of acronyms and buzzwords. There is TQC, TQM, fishbone diagramming, cause and effect, poka yoke, big Q, and little q.” An entire industry has sprung up just to provide material to support quality initiatives. The Juran Institute sells a $15,000 do-it-yourself kit complete with 16 videotapes, 10 workbooks, a leader’s manual, overhead transparencies, and a five-day course to teach someone how to run the tapes. Harvard’s Garvin observes that all of the Baldrige Award winners had developed their own approach to quality. The most effective way to develop a solid quality approach is to have it developed in-house. 5. Briefly describe the contributions W. Edwards Deming made to the field of quality management. Why do you believe he is the most influential quality expert? Deming outlined 14 points for management: In the 1950s, Japanese-made products were frequently called inferior, tinny, and shoddy. Today, names such as Toyota and Sony are equated with high-quality manufacturing. Deming stressed that consumers are well served by insisting that service and product providers deliver high quality. He believed that the more consumers demand high-quality products and services, the more firms will continually aspire to higher levels of performance. As opposed to 20 years ago, consumers now expect high-quality products at a reasonable cost. 6. Deming believed poor quality was not the fault of workers but resulted from poor management of the system for quality improvement. Do you agree with Deming’s stand on this issue? Why or why not? Answers here will vary. Some things to consider: Deming raises the topic of “continual, never-ending improvement.” How does this place the responsibility for quality on the shoulders of management? What does this philosophy say about Deming’s general approach to management? A key motivator in our culture is looking for the source of the problem. Deming places the problem in management’s lap. How do today’s management philosophies either support or deny this approach? Think about Theory X and Y. Research Ouchi’s Theory Z. Also consider Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Is there commonality in these philosophies? Yes, I agree with Deming’s stand. Poor quality often stems from inadequate management systems rather than individual worker performance. Effective quality management requires robust systems, processes, and leadership to address underlying issues and drive continuous improvement. 7. Deming was not an advocate of mass inspection as a means of ensuring product quality. Please explain Deming’s beliefs in this area. Taken out of context, the statement is curious. However, from page 29, we read: “Eliminate the need for inspection on a mass basis by building quality into the product in the first place.” Is Deming discussing the place that quality must have in the general context of the process? Is quality a feature that you add on at the end of the process? How revolutionary is this statement? How does the popular literature about management address this attitude? If you tie this back to the discussion of Jack Welch in Chapter 1, the importance of visionary leadership is identified. Goldratt discusses the theory of constraints. He says that constraints, or bottlenecks, affect the flow of product through the system. Can quality be a constraint? Deming believed that mass inspection was ineffective for ensuring quality because it only identifies defects rather than preventing them. He advocated for building quality into the process through continuous improvement and systematic problem-solving, rather than relying on inspection to catch errors after they occur. 8. Select one of Deming’s 14 points for management and describe how this point could have resulted in quality improvements in a business or volunteer organization with which you have been involved. Every successful manager can point to failures in his or her past. The difference between a successful manager and an unsuccessful manager is how he or she reacts to those failures. Although this concept is seldom discussed, writers like Deming and Juran are sharing the remedies, either made or observed, to past failures. The success of these writers is based upon the fact that they can help the new manager avoid the common, but not obvious, pitfalls. Any person who has had a position of authority should be able to read Deming’s list and identify a mistake that was made relating to each one. This should prove to be a fascinating classroom session, especially if the professor joins in the discussion and adds his or her own experiences. 9. Briefly describe the contributions that Joseph M. Juran made to the field of quality management. What do you believe was Juran’s most significant contribution? Juran discusses three processes: planning, control, and improvement. He states that these processes are sequential: first planning, then control, and then improvement. Juran’s emphasis is on continued improvement – control, not breakthrough. Juran uses Pareto’s law, the 80%/20% rule, to identify the quality problems. 10. Is the concept of scientific management compatible with employee empowerment? Why or why not? Frederick W. Taylor launched scientific management. It separated planning from execution. Taylor gave the planning function to managers and engineers. He limited supervisors and workers to the function of executing the plans. The result of the “Taylor Revolution” was centralizing the quality function. How does this approach fit within the framework established by Deming? Taylor published his treatise in 1911. How has the culture of the workplace evolved since then? 11. Does the phrase “quality is the responsibility of the quality department” reflect a healthy perspective of quality management? Please explain your answer. This revolves around the question, “Whose job is quality?” By centralizing quality, Taylor removed it from the day-to-day operation of the company. As the topic of quality is removed from the production floor, what is management’s response going to be? If we look back at Juran, is this now a control or a breakthrough function? Why? Taylor notes that by delegating quality to the quality manager, the line supervisors and managers could devote their own time to other matters. As they did so, they became progressively less and less informed about quality. When a quality problem developed, management lacked the expertise needed to choose a proper course of action. No, it does not reflect a healthy perspective of quality management. Quality should be a shared responsibility across the entire organization, not just the quality department. Effective quality management requires involvement from all departments and levels, integrating quality practices into every aspect of operations. 12. Briefly describe the Japanese quality revolution following World War II. What can modern day managers learn from studying the history of this era? After the war, the industrial leaders in Japan turned their attention toward improving the quality of Japanese manufactured goods. The quality revolution in Japan was initiated through the following steps: They sent teams abroad to learn how foreign countries achieved quality. They translated foreign literature into Japanese. They invited Deming to lecture in Japan and listened carefully to Deming's views on quality. To the credit of the Japanese people, they implemented what they learned about quality management, and in many cases, eventually improved on what they learned. The result was a virtual quality revolution in Japan in the years following World War II. 13. What was Joseph Juran’s primary contribution to quality thinking in America? Discuss Juran’s three-step process to improving quality. Juran’s three-step process was: Planning Control Improvement This three-step process emphasized control over breakthrough. This was a major step towards ongoing quality improvement, rather than mass inspections. This approach moved the process of quality to the lowest possible level. 14. Hothouse quality refers to those quality programs that receive a lot of hoopla and no follow-through. Provide several examples of management practices that can lead to hothouse quality. How can hothouse quality be avoided? Management practices that are focused on achieving short-term objectives and/or immediate results are susceptible to hothouse quality. Hothouse quality programs often promise dramatic increases in performance over a relatively short period of time. Consistently productive decision makers typically see this as an unrealistic goal, and avoid these types of programs. Less successful decision makers and decision makers desperate to see quality improvement quickly may be more prone to investigate these programs. 15. Compare and contrast Deming’s, Juran’s, and Crosby’s perspectives of quality management. What are the major similarities and differences between their perspectives? Deming addressed the entire process and focused primarily on the assertion that poor quality is not the fault of the worker, but is the fault of the system. Deming also strongly opposed the creation of quality inspection departments. He felt that quality should not be the responsibility of the quality inspection departments. It should be built into the product. Juran's work focuses on the idea that organizational quality problems are largely the result of insufficient and ineffective planning for quality. In addition, Juran fleshed out many of the implementation issues involved with quality through his trilogy. Crosby made two key points in his arguments about the responsibility of the quality department, and not the individual worker. Crosby has enjoyed the most commercial success of the three. First, he argued that quality, as a managed process, could be a source of profit for an organization. Second, Crosby adopted a "zero defects" approach to quality management, and emphasized the behavioral and motivational aspects of quality improvement rather than statistical approaches. Similarities: All three men were very passionate about the role of quality in business organizations, and felt that quality is a process that must be deliberately managed. In addition, all three of them saw quality as the focal point for organizational performance and effectiveness. Differences: Deming and Juran were more statistically oriented in their approach than Crosby. The each emphasized different aspects of quality management in their approaches. Crosby's zero defects approach probably goes further than would be advocated by Deming or Juran. Crosby was also more prolific than Deming and Juran in terms of the production of quality-related materials (e.g., videos, workbooks, lecture series, etc.). 16. Describe Taguchi’s perspective of ideal quality. Does this perspective have practical applications? If you were a manager, would you consider using the Taguchi method? Why? Table 2-4 on page 37 provides an overview of the Taguchi method. Taguchi accomplishes these steps by emphasizing a three-fold approach to quality: The definition of quality The quality loss function The concept of robust design A key element of the Taguchi concept is that of robust design. This states that products and services should be designed so that they are inherently defect-free and of high quality. Taguchi sets his target high. The overall effect of this is desirable and accomplishable. 17. Why do you think that reengineering programs have such a high failure rate? Can you think of ways to improve the success rate of reengineering programs? Reengineering bypasses the analysis and design steps and tries to piggyback on the past successes of others. Reengineering programs have experienced a high failure rate primarily because they tend to oversimplify extremely complex organizational issues, and as a result, do not focus managers on the attention to detail and analysis that is necessary to effect meaningful (and effective) organizational change. Reengineering programs would probably be more successful if they were combined with more traditional and well-founded approaches to effective organizational change. 18. Describe how the contingency perspective helps us understand why a single approach to quality management may never emerge. The text states that firms that are successful in quality do not adopt a blanket “Deming approach to quality.” These firms utilize the applicable approaches that help them improve. The author discusses this as the contingency perspective. The direction is that different quality problems mandate different quality improvement approaches. On page 40, the author states: From your own perspective, you need to make correct quality-related decisions. In doing this, you should consider the different quality experts in this chapter and choose those concepts and approaches that make sense for you. The contingency perspective suggests that the effectiveness of a quality management approach depends on various factors such as organizational context, industry, and specific challenges. This perspective helps us understand why a single approach to quality management may never emerge because: 1. Context-Specific Needs: Different organizations have unique needs and conditions that require tailored quality management strategies. 2. Variable Factors: Factors like company size, culture, and technology vary, influencing which quality practices are most effective. 3. Dynamic Environments: Industries and markets evolve, necessitating adaptable and diverse quality management approaches. Thus, a one-size-fits-all approach is unlikely to address the diverse needs and circumstances of all organizations. 19. How can a philosophy of quality improvement help a firm in its overall efforts of improving the quality of its products and services? The one common element of all these approaches is that quality cannot be an adjunct to the process. Quality must be an integral part of the development. For this to happen, a philosophy of quality improvement must be ingrained into the corporate culture. The point is made that quality starts in the design phase and continues through the product manufacture Any major change to a corporate culture must have full support from top management. Quality is not any different. 20. Do you believe that CEOs and business managers should be skeptical about the quality movement, or should they embrace the quality movement and try to involve their firms in as many quality initiatives as possible? Please explain your answer. The key to this question may be the phrase "as many quality initiatives as possible." Any project requires planning. The more of an effect a project will have on a firm, the more careful the planning must be. Integrating a quality program is no exception. Every part of the firm is affected. Poor planning can be disastrous. CEOs and business managers should embrace the quality movement and involve their firms in quality initiatives. Embracing quality initiatives can lead to improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage. However, they should also critically evaluate each initiative to ensure it aligns with their specific organizational needs and goals. Case 2-1: Rheaco, Inc.: Making a Quality Turnabout byAsking for Advice Discussion Questions: 1. Many companies fail in their efforts to improve quality without ever having asked for advice. In your opinion, what are some of the reasons that inhibit firms from asking for timely advice? If you were a manager at Rheaco, would you have sought out an agency like the ARRI? Many companies get into “fire fighting mode.” They are so busy solving immediate problems that no one has time to dig into the cause of the problems. Many of Deming’s 14 points speak to this problem: Adopting a new philosophy (point 2), driving out fear (point 8), and remove barriers to pride (point 12), all seem to be based on point 7, improve leadership. The problem is that sometimes leadership does not realize that they are the roadblocks. Firms can be insulated. Cultures can be stagnant. One solution is ensuring that management participates in professional organizations. Another solution might be encouraging employees to continue their education and bring in ideas from their classes. A firm such as ARRI can be in the vanguard of conceptual development. The major problem is finding out that they exist. 2. Discuss ARRI’s recommendations to Rheaco. How did these recommendations help Rheaco improve its product quality? First, AARI helped Rheaco develop an Enterprise Excellence Plan, which acted as a roadmap for Rheaco's improvement efforts. Consistent with this effort, AARI helped Rheaco implement several standard quality improvement programs, including cellular manufacturing, just-in-time inventory control, total quality management, and employee empowerment. Through this process, AARI worked in partnership with Rheaco to implement the recommended initiatives and to gradually turn over the change process to Rheaco itself. Other improvements were made, particularly in the areas of shipping and receiving, inventory control, and human resource management. Collectively, these changes had a profound influence on Rheaco's ability to improve its product quality. A key statement is made on page 46: After ARRI had been working with Rheaco for a period of time, the company started identifying and correcting problem on its own, which is exactly what is supposed to happen. People want to succeed. In an environment where success is rewarded, people will thrive and bring the company along with them. 3. ARRI’s initial evaluation of Rheaco indicated that Rheaco’s employees, despite the company’s difficulties, had an overall positive attitude. Do you believe that this factor contributed to ARRI’s ability to provide Rheaco advice? Why or why not? Most students will say that the attitude of Rheaco's employees was a significant factor in AARI's ability to provide Rheaco advice. As discussed in Chapter 1, it is impossible to implement quality without the commitment and action of employees. Because Rheaco's employees had a positive attitude, the company started its quality improvement efforts with one major obstacle already overcome. It would have been much more difficult for Rheaco to accomplish what it did if it would have had to first convince its employees that it was doing the right thing. However, it is important to understand why the employees’ morale was positive in the first place? How does management style enter into this? Could this enterprise have been possible if management did not establish a positive environment? Figure 2.6 on page 44 identifies the role of leadership. In this diagram, everything revolves around leadership. Yes, the positive attitude of Rheaco’s employees likely contributed to ARRI’s ability to provide effective advice. A positive attitude indicates a willingness to engage with change and improvements, which facilitates collaboration and receptiveness to external recommendations. This supportive environment makes it easier for ARRI to implement and gain acceptance for their advice, fostering a more successful quality turnaround. Case 2-2: Has Disney Developed a Theory of Quality Guest Services Management? Discussion Questions: 1. Is Disney’s level of emphasis on anticipating the behavior of its guests appropriate, or does the company expend too much effort in this area? Explain your answer. Before Disneyland, carnivals had a reputation as being seedy and unscrupulous. Walt Disney saw the need for a family-friendly wholesome theme park. In fact, Disneyland was the very first theme park. The success of Disneyland and Disneyworld justifies the process. All successful theme parks have followed the Disney model. Deming’s 14 points continuously emphasizes the value of customer satisfaction. The guest is the customer. 2. Is it appropriate to think in terms of developing a “theory” of how guests will behave in a theme park or any other setting? If so, why? On page 26 the text discusses this topic thusly: The text goes on to discuss this topic in A Closer Look At Quality 2-1: Is there a difference between the way theme parks anticipate their guests’ behavior and the way a supermarket arranges their shelving display to optimize sales? 3. Think about the last time that you visited a theme park. Were your expectations met? Did you have a sense that the operator of the park attempts to “anticipate” the behavior of the guests? If so, provide some specific examples. This question can best be answered on a personal basis. What experiences did the class have at theme parks? Theme parks are not inexpensive places. Was the general consensus that value was there? Will they return? Who is the audience that the theme park targets: parents, children, or subsections of the population? An interesting aspect is the question: Why was Disneyland, Paris not as successful as other Disney efforts? When I last visited a theme park, my expectations were met. The park seemed to anticipate guest behavior through features like clear signage, efficient queue management, and amenities like rest areas and food stations placed strategically. For example, the park had well-placed maps and staff who guided guests, minimizing confusion and enhancing the overall experience. Solution Manual for Managing Quality: Integrating the Supply Chain Thomas S. Foster 9780133798258
Download
Close
Close
